How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Senior Partner Your Own Question
Senior Partner
Senior Partner, Solicitor
Category: UK Immigration Law
Satisfied Customers: 13325
Experience:  Solicitor
Type Your UK Immigration Law Question Here...
Senior Partner is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Benefit fraud

This answer was rated:

Hi, My wife was on benefit and then she got an offer at Univeristy to do Nursing, in 2004. After getting an offter, she failed to inform the local authoririty about her changes and kept on receiving benefit together with the school bursary. Later. In July 2006, she applied for a British Citizenship. In November 2007, she went to court and was convicted and given 2 years suspended sentence. Immediately, she started paying back the money. In December 2007, the law about the benefit fraud changed. Recently, i,e one week ago, she received a letter from UK Border, refusing her the British Citizenship, on good character ground citing that she failed to mention about the unspent conviction. But the time she applied in 2006, there was no conviction. The only time she got the chance to disclose that, was, when she was applying for no limit stamp in her passport on 18 July 2008. My question is, can she be punished by 2007 law, when there was no conviction yet/ or she can only be punished by laws before that? And what the law before the one of 2007 say about benefit cheat? Many thanks

It has always been the case that citizenship can be refused on grounds of character. The difference in the rules is that it is now compulsory to refuse an application until even minor convictions are spent previously there was some discretion to ignore some minor offences but frankly I do not think you will get anywhere appealing against the refusal as benefit fraud is very serious even if she only got a suspended sentence.

Why did her application for citizenship take so long to determine? It is unusual for it to take form 2006 to 2011
Customer: replied 6 years ago.

I do understand that it was a serious crime, but can you give me some guidance? What does the law say about the same crime before 2007. Because, I believe, in my opinion, the law the case worker applied to my wife case was the new law instead of applying the old one.

I thought I did. To be clear the law has not changed. The nationality act requires applicants to be of good character. Prior to 2007 determining this was discretionary but it is likely that someone convinced of a serious offence would be refused. Minor offences could be ignored. The change was to make clear that anyone with any conviction at all would not be regarded as of good character even motoring offences.

You have not explained why it took 4 years for the application to be dealt with
Senior Partner and other UK Immigration Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 6 years ago.
Every time we called the UK Border Agency, they were saying that, the case was still under enquiry and there was nothing we could do about that
Does your wife have indefinite leave ? if so you may just have to wait until the conviction is spent (10 years)

Related UK Immigration Law Questions