Estate Law

Estate Law Questions? Ask an Estate Lawyer.

Ask a Lawyer, Get an Answer ASAP!

Resulting Trusts

A resulting trust is an agreement where an individual keeps hold of a certain property for the benefit of another person. A resulting trust is created in court in many different cases where one person moves property to another and then gives the second person legal documents to the property. Given below are a few questions answered by the Experts on this issue.

In a case where a family member has just passed away, what can an individual do in order to retrieve the trust documents?

In this case, if the interested individual does not have the trust instrument that would help prove the trust conditions, the trust would be declared invalid and the trust property would return to the estate of the individual who has passed. This is legally referred to as a resulting trust. The interested individual would then need to apply to the probate court to get appointed as the administrator of the estate and successor trustee. Once this is done, they can get an inventory of the property along with any other assets that lie in the trust and follow the laws of intestate succession to divide the property among the heirs.

When filing for Bankruptcy if an individual has not listed his real estate assets, can he now claim that the property belongs to him because of a resulting trust? How does judicial estoppel be used as a defense here?

If the individual says that the property belongs to him because of a resulting trust and if the individual filed bankruptcy and did not list the assets as his property, a judicial estoppel could be used as a viable defense. A judicial estoppel is based on the following factors:

1. The plaintiff’s first position is inconsistent with his later position;
2. The plaintiff was able to persuade the court to accept the plaintiff’s previous position. This could seem like the plaintiff misled the court; and finally,
3. The plaintiff’s maintaining of an inconsistent position would give them an unfair advantage or force an unfair loss on the other party if they were not estopped.

The first two factors are satisfied in this case since the individual did not mention the assets when he was filing bankruptcy and later chose to claim them. As for factor three, the person from whom the individual is demanding his assets back can say that the assets have been maintained by them for many years now, they have paid taxes on them and denying ownership now would put them at a risk of criminal liability for fraud. Thus, in this case, the individual can be judicially estopped.

My lawyer appears to have made a mistake by not stating a beneficiary on a trust agreement. Has the law always stated a beneficiary must be included? If not, when was the law changed to include the naming of a beneficiary?

A trust agreement by definition must always have a beneficiary. When a beneficiary is not listed on a trust agreement the common rule is that a resulting trust is created in favor of the deceased’s estate if the trust is testamentary. If the trust is not testamentary then the trustee holds ownership of the trust. In cases where the attorney has made a mistake by not naming a beneficiary, the individual will have the right to sue for malpractice. However, the trust that is written cannot change and will still be in effect.

When constructing a resulting trust, there are many questions that can arise. These could include queries that involve understanding the requirements of a resulting trust, the process of setting up a trust and so on. Put your questions to the Experts now for quick and insightful answers that can help you with your case.
Please type your question in the field below

3 verified Estate Lawyers are online now

Estate Lawyers on JustAnswer are verified through an extensive 8-step process including screening of licenses, certifications, education and/or employment. Learn more

Online
Thomas McJD

Attorney

Doctoral Degree

★★★★★
3170 positive reviews
Online
Barrister

Attorney

Doctoral Degree

★★★★★
5256 positive reviews
Online
Infolawyer

Attorney

Juris Doctor.

★★★★★
4977 positive reviews
See all Estate Lawyers
JustAnswer in the news:
Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.