How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask JGM Your Own Question
JGM, Solicitor
Category: Scots Law
Satisfied Customers: 11149
Experience:  30 years as a practising solicitor.
Type Your Scots Law Question Here...
JGM is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I need to show an immigration lawyer in Canada the wording

This answer was rated:

I need to show an immigration lawyer in Canada the wording of the Fraud and kindred offences common law in Scotland for a minor conviction received in 1995, (which resulted in a 20hr community order) and cannot find anything to refer to online. Can anyone provide the wording (and its reference) of the applicable law at this time to enable him to compare the seriousness of the offence to the Canadian Statute law?
Thank you for your question.

The definition is as follows:

A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury.

There is no reference; that is simply the definition in Scotland and indeed many jurisdictions.

I hope this helps. Please leave a positive response so that I am credited for my time.
Customer: replied 4 years ago.

Thanks for your time, that really isn't what we are looking for though - it is more a case of how would the procurator fiscal categorise the offence to the person deciding on the sentence? The best example that I can think of is for instance a murder can be categorised into different levels of seriousness depending on intent, circumstances etc etc and the charge would reflect that. There must be some documentation to refer to to enable the lawyers and judges to base their cases on?

So frustrating, i'm not a lawyer myself (obviously!), just trying to show that the level of charge is not deemed at the most serious end of the spectrum.


That has nothing to do with the definition of the law or how that definition is worded. It has to do with the wording of the complaint upon which you were convicted.

To use your analogy, if the charge of murder were worded:

" did chase him along the street, push him to the ground, restrain him and stab him repeatedly on the face and body and did murder him....."

That would be more serious than

" did stab him once in the stomach and did murder him...."

So it's not the definition of the offence; murder is murder and fraud is fraud. The definition doesn't change.

The only way to show someone that your offence was not at the serious end of the spectrum is to show what th wording of the charge was. The lenient disposal would also be relevant.
JGM and other Scots Law Specialists are ready to help you