Yes, there is an implied contract that the amenities will continue to be available for the tenants; otherwise that would constitute misrepresentation (or fraud in the inducement if it is intended to encourage the tenant to sign the lease).
Basically if the premises are not as represented, the tenant may sue in small claims;
They may not withhold rent-that is a remedy for when the unit itself is not habitable (ie bad plumbing, infestation, etc) and withholding rent can lead to an eviction notice.
Rather one can sue in small claims (under $10,000) for the difference in the apartment as represented (with amenities) and the difference in the apartment as it actually exists. This will be a monthly amount and the court may award a judgment for the difference. They can also direct the landlord to lower the lease rent for the duration of the lease.
It helps to document it by photos showing long term issues, and by sending a demand letter, requesting an offset of rent. If no response then one can pursue it in small claims.
Further questions? Please post here to continue the chat.
Satisfied? Kindly rate positively so I receive credit for assisting you. I hope that you feel I have earned
5 stars 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟*****
as I strive to provide my customers with great service. ☺️
(no additional charges are incurred).
Information provided is for educational purposes only. Consultation with a personal attorney is always recommended so your particular facts may be considered. The terms addressing this can be viewed here:
Thank you and take care.