How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Attyadvisor Your Own Question
Attyadvisor, Attorney
Category: Real Estate Law
Satisfied Customers: 7228
Experience:  29 years of experience in General Practice, Real Estate Law and Estate Law.
Type Your Real Estate Law Question Here...
Attyadvisor is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I need questions answered regarding partial interest

This answer was rated:

I need questions answered regarding partial interest appraising of jointly owned property for estate settlement purposes.

Hello! I will be reviewing your question and posting a response momentarily; if you have any follow up questions please respond here. Thanks!

Hello. What is your question please?

Customer: replied 8 months ago.
My house is half owned by an estate / trust.How is the 50% of the house evaluated?The executor is trying to say a flat 50% the appraised value - yet everything I read says there should be a discount and a fractional or partial interest appraisal should be completed.Can you please confirm how this is done legally?

I apologize. I have been waiting for your response to my followup and it apparently did not post!

Are you referring to equity sharing appraisals, which are used when the parties make different contributions to the property which creates additional but unequal equity?

Customer: replied 8 months ago.
No. At least not that I know of.I am talking about my home - which I own 50% of, and other 50% is owned by an estate which is currently being settled. The executors are placing a value on the 50% owned by the estate - they are using $450,000. The house appraised for $900,000.Shouldn't the 50% b discounted since it's a fractional/partial interest?

No. If there are 2 co-owners and they each own 50%, each owner would get their 50% share. So if the entire value is $900k and each party owns half, each owner would get $450k.

The equity sharing is applicable if for example one party paid 100% of the mortgage as that would increase their equity and would require a more detailed calculation.

Customer: replied 8 months ago.
34;The IRS requires the appraisal of a partial interest to adhere to specific IRS regulations regarding the valuation of partial interests or else they will disallow the appraisal and can even prohibit the appraiser from appraising for federal (IRS) tax purposes. Plus submitting such an inappropriate appraisal virtually guarantees an IRS audit."^^ Is this not true?

Is that referencing publication 1457 from the IRS?

Customer: replied 8 months ago.
I have no idea. This was told to me by an appraiser. Also our personal attorney says they do reduction values on partial interest ownership on houses all the time - they even have standard percentages they use.
Customer: replied 8 months ago.
It doesn't sound like you are familiar with this.

The only time I have seen partial appraisals per IRS regulations is regarding donated property or when there is a life estate. If there are 2 co-owners then a standard appraisal is used as is common in cases involving the sale of property with multiple owners.

Customer: replied 8 months ago.
what do you mean by "life estate"

It is when a person is the owner of the life estate allowing them to live there, and then upon their passing ownership passes to the remaindermen

Customer: replied 8 months ago.
I am leaving my office so wont be able to respond for a couple of hours... will return.

Thank you

Hello again; just checking in to see how things worked out;
if you have further questions please don't hesitate to reach out to me here on Just Answer.

Customer: replied 8 months ago.
Well I would like to discuss this further, but you do not seem familiar with the concept of a doing a fractional or partial interest appraisal for a portion of a home - and that's really what I need advice on. I have been told by two different appraisers that this is what needs to happen and there are also countless articles online about this as well. Also my personal attorney is familiar with this as well.

I will opt out so someone else can assist you.
Thank you.

I am a different Attorney and it will be my pleasure to assist you.

"My house is half owned by an estate / trust.

How is the 50% of the house evaluated?

The executor is trying to say a flat 50% the appraised value - yet everything I read says there should be a discount and a fractional or partial interest appraisal should be completed.

Can you please confirm how this is done legally?"

The appraisal would be performed by a licensed appraiser. Is your question regarding the IRS?

Customer: replied 8 months ago.
My main question is: When there is a home that is owned 50% by an individual and 50% by a trust/estate, how do you value the 50% owned by the trust so the individual can purchase? My understanding is that is it not a flat 50% of the full market value.

So you are asking how the appraisal is handled when it is a 50% interest.

Customer: replied 8 months ago.
I am asking how the 50% is valued

You are correct that there is a "discount" factored in.

"Partial interest valuation is a technique used by appraisers and other valuation professionals to estimate the value of a fractional interest in real estate. Fractional interests in real estate result from the owner's ownership of less than 100% of a given property. The technique involves the valuing of a fractional interest in real property with a discount factor being applied to that fractional interest. Reflective of what could be a number of factors including, but not limited to the nature of the property, the percentage or ownership and the management structure in place an appropriate "discount factor" is chosen by a valuation professional. Ownership of a partial interest in real property ownership can manifest itself in a number of forms. Those ownership forms include, but are not limited to: ***** ***** limited partnerships, REITs, joint tenancy, tenants in common, tenancy by entirety, family trusts and ownership of shares in a limited liability corporation."

The transfer or conveyance of a partial interest can arise from any number of events including: divorce, partnership dissolution, estate planning, donation or sale of a partial interest to an unrelated party and so on. In theory, partial interests are almost always worth less than their fractional value. For example, a $1 million property owned by five different owners, each with a 20% interest, would in pure mathematical terms have a value of $200,000 for each interest. That 20% interest, were it to be marketed or sold to another party would be considered a minority interest.

Customer: replied 8 months ago.
is there a standard percentage for the discount - or how is that determined
Customer: replied 8 months ago.
for example - if the house is appraised at 1mil and there are two owners, what would 50% of the house be worth?

That depends on many factors. The percentage depends on the factors listed below:

"The nature of a minority interest is that it typically has the following characteristics:

* Lack of marketability

* Longer than typical marketing time

* Lack of control

* Limited or no ability to refinance the property

* Limited ability to influence decision-making policies

Discounts associated with a partial interest can typically range from 20% to 60% of the proportionate value of the interest as it relates to the entire property. In the case of the $200,000 fractional interest above, a discount factor would be applied to the fractional value.

The IRS perspective

The perspective or position of the IRS has frequently been that the discount applied to the fractional interest be limited to the actual cost of partitioning a property. The courts fortunately, have generally recognized that this is both unreasonable and illogical. The fact is that fractional interests for the most part have a very limited market appeal to the general marketplace with the range of appeal varying by the type of property and the percentage of ownership.

The IRS Training Manual for Appeals Officers in fact recognizes and cites several factors that could influence the size of the discount. The following factors are listed in the manual:

* The number of owners

* The size of the fractional interest

* The size of the tract

* The use of the land

* The availability of financing and finally,

* The cost of partitioning (dividing) the land

Valuation Methodology

The following steps would be involved in valuing a partial interest:

1. Value the property in its entirety;

2. Calculate the value of the proportionate share in the property by taking the 100% value of the property times the percentage of property owned;

3. Determine an appropriate discount for the partial interest;

4. Calculate the value of the fractional interest by multiplying the value of the "proportionate share" times the discount rate."

This is why you a licensed appraiser that is familiar with dealing with this type of situation.

Customer: replied 8 months ago.
ok, so if I am the owner and the estate is telling me I have to pay a flat 50% of the market value for the other half of my home - that is not the way it is done. correct?

Correct. Your 50% (1/2) will appraise at a discounted percentage based on the particular factors in your situation.

"Valuation discounts for transfers of undivided interests in real property have been the subject of case law for over 80 years.3 Throughout this period, not unpredictably, the Internal Revenue Service, on a variety of grounds, has resisted such discounts. Most recently the position has been that any discount should be limited to the cost of a partition action.4 This position has been thoroughly rejected by every court that has dealt with the subject.5 For instance, in Estate of Barge,6 a gift tax case in which the only issue was the proper discount of a gift of a 25 percent undivided interest in timberland, the Tax Court refused to rely on the cost of partition of the property, but based its opinion on the present value of the expected cash flows from the future harvesting of timber until partition would be likely to occur, arriving at a value equivalent to a 26 percent discount.7

In the most recent case of Estate of Williams v. Commissioner,8 the Tax Court likewise rejected the cost-of-partition limitation and discounted the value of gifts of one-half interests in two parcels of timberland by 20 percent for lack of marketability and an additional 30 percent for lack of control, applying the discounts seriatim for an effective 44 percent discount. The large size of the discount reflects the fact that the government submitted no appraisal testimony on the magnitude of the discount, but, instead, conceding a mere five percent discount, contended that taxpayer failed to meet the burden of proof because taxpayer had offered no evidence of actual sales of fractional interests. In rejecting this contention, the court emphasized that a banker credibly testified that banks generally will not lend money to the owner of a fractional interest in real property without the consent of the co-owners and that the inability of the appraisers to find sales of fractional interests in comparable real property showed that there was no market for fractional interests in such real property. The court further noted favorably the testimony by taxpayer's appraiser that the holder of a fractional interest in real property lacks control because such holder cannot manage it unilaterally.9

After Williams, and its immediate antecedents, the issue is not whether a discount will be allowed, but based on the facts of each particular case, what will be the size of an appropriate discount. l0

III. Rationales For Discounts

The premise for fractional interest discounts is that each tenant-in-common, regardless of the size of such tenant's interest, is entitled to possess and use the co-owned property and, without resort to partition, cannot "oust" the other co-owners.ll This forced sharing .of access (rather than lack of access) has the potential to create significant confusion and upheaval.12 Further, since even a co-tenant with the smallest fractional interest has a right to operate the property subject to the identical right of each of the other co-owners, all co-owners must agree to all decisions related to the property if the operation is to be a success. A co-tenant thus has a veto, and disagreements can lead to gridlock.13 Judgment creditors of any co-tenant may secure a lien on such tenant's undivided interest and compel partition. In addition, the identity of a co-tenant can change with death or divorce. Finally, as noted in the Williams case,14 financial institutions will not provide a loan on undivided interest property where the property is the sole collateral unless all undivided interest holders sign the loan documents.

With the foregoing disadvantages in mind, why would a hypothetical willing buyer15 purchase a fractional interest without a sizable discount?

Each co-tenant, even one with just a minor or "sliver" interest, has the power to compel partition. The right of partition cuts both ways. It is valuable to the co-tenant desiring partition, less so to those in favor of the status quo. In a partition action, the court may partition the real property in kind, under which the property is physically divided in equitable proportions.16 If, however, division in kind is inconvenient, !he court may alternatively allot the entire property to a co-tenant who will accept it and pay to the other co-tenants cash for their pro-rata shares. As a final possibility, if division in kind is inconvenient and the interests of all co-tenants will be promoted by a sale of the entire property, the court may order a sale and a pro-rata division of the proceeds.17 Where more than one co-tenant entitled to partition seeks allotment of the entire property to himself, a Virginia trial court does not abuse its discretion in refusing allotment to either of them and ordering the property to be sold.18

Once the partition action begins, absent agreement of all co-tenants, the sales process is out of the hands of each co-tenant, and whether a cotenant agrees to the bid subsequently confirmed by the court is irrelevant.19 As in any judicial sale, the trial court can accept bids until the final decree is entered. 20 In practice once the special commissioner of sale has been authorized by the court to sell the property, 21 such commissioner solicits bids over a reasonable period of time and generally accepts the highest non-contingent, reasonable bid subject to confirmation by the court. In such a system, a co-tenant has no veto but is limited to outbidding the highest bidder. To say that such co-tenant is a "willing seller" is problematic. Also, since the period of bidding is limited in practice, taking the property off the market until it improves is usually not an alternative. Because the sales process is placed outside the control of any co-tenant in a partition action, in many cases the mere threat of partition will cause the co-tenants to agree to sell the property.

Not only does the partition process lead to a forced sale, it is also fraught with the possibility of high costs22 and significant delays.23 The prospect of delay depresses the investment desirability due to the uncertainty of what the underlying property will likely be sold for at the end of the partition process. Since the property in partition is tied up over an extended period of time during which market conditions may fluctuate, opportunities for favorable sales may be lost. Several studies, including one involving private placement of Rule 144 stock (forced holding period of two years - 24% discount), a later one involving 160 Rule 144 securities (overall average discount 20%, those companies with less then $10 million in market value having an average discount of 31%), and one involving liquidating secondary market limited partnerships (discount 26%), have in analogous situations attempted to quantify the discount associated with forced time delay similar to that inherent in the partition process.24

In summary a willing buyer will not purchase an undivided co-ownership interest for a price equal to the overall value of the property times the amount of the percentage interest, but will insist upon a discount because forced sharing of control is intrinsic to a tenancy-in-common and there is uncertainty whether a sale in partition, due to its forced nature and the costs and delays involved, will yield a price truly reflective off air market value.

IV. Application of Discounts

Although not entirely free from discussion,25 in a gift tax setting under current law, discounts are applied with "blinders" on, that is, you look simply at what is being transferred, not who is doing the transferring or who is getting the transfer26 or the existence of other transfers by or to the same persons or what is being retained.27 Accordingly, where the owner of an undivided 50 percent interest in real property gives the interest to the other 50 percent co owner, such gift would be viewed in isolation, and its value for gift tax purposes would be entitled to a discount.

On the other hand, an undivided interest transferred at death will be aggregated for estate tax valuation purposes with all other interests owned at death by decedent in the same property.28Thus, fractionalization of decedent's interest in a parcel occurring post-death will not result in discounts in valuing the parcel on decedent's estate tax retum.29 For example, where decedent devises equal percentages of decedent's vacation home to decedent's children, the full fair market value of the home will be includible in decedent's estate.

Similar to the gift tax situation, decedent's property is valued without regard to the identity of the beneficiary. The principle as stated in Propstra v. United States30 is as follows:

Because the estate tax is a tax on the privilege of transferring property upon one's death, the property to be valued for estate purposes is that which the decedent actually transfers at his death rather than the interest held by the decedent before death or that held by the legatee after death.31

In an earlier case, Estate of Lee v. Commissioner,32 cited in Propstra,33 the Tax Court had declined to aggregate, for purposes of determining whether decedent had a controlling interest, decedent's 50 percent undivided interest in common stock with a like interest owned by her husband-beneficiary.34 In Estate of Andrews v. Commissioner,35 the Tax Court refused to attribute decedent's siblings' 80 percent stock interest to decedent, holding that the value of decedent's 20% interest was entitled to a combined 60% discount for lack of control and lack of marketability.36

In Estate of Pilsbury v. Commissioner,37 the Tax Court, in allowing a 15 percent discount, stated that it would not apply attribution principles to combine a 77 percent undivided interest in real property held in trust for decedent with the other 23 percent interest held by the same trustee for the benefit of issue of decedent's late spouse.38 Finally in the Estate of Bonner v. Commissioner,39 the Fifth Circuit held that the value of undivided fractional interests in real and personal property owned outright by decedent were entitled to a fractional interest valuation discount for estate tax purposes inasmuch as such interests did not have to be aggregated with the remaining interests (in such property) which were held by a QTIP trust established for decedent's benefit by his wife and included in decedent's estate under Sec. 2044 of the Internal Revenue Code.

V. Size of Discounts

Discount percentages in cases allowing fractional interest discounts have ranged from 5 to 60 percent, with quite a few decisions at 10 percent and 15 percent.40 More recently, the spread seems to be between 15 to 20 percent.41 Setting the size of the discount is largely a matter of expert opinion; however, one nationally known planner simply obtains an appraisal of the value of the overall property, multiplies the ownership percentage by such overall value and then discounts by 20 percent (without using an expert for the discount).42

Any appraiser hired to determine an appropriate discount in a given case should be thoroughly familiar with discount strategies related to more sophisticated techniques.43 In particular, the appraiser should be sensitive to the time value of money and have knowledge of relevant studies related to forced holding periods.44 In addition, the appraiser should have facility with various valuation methodologies including the capitalization of cash flow and holding company methods., The appraiser should consult with a lawyer who has expert knowledge concerning tenancies-in-common and the partitioning process in the locality of the property. Besides developing a data base concerning the ease of divisibility of the parcel in question, sales of comparable fractional interests, if any, the availability of financing for the interest and costs, time and forced control issues, the appraiser should note any special difficulties related to the size, type and use of the property and the number of owners and their percentage interests.45

VI. Planning Observations

In every potentially taxable estate, the planner should consider advising the client to fractionalize real property. As between spouses, suitable regard should be given to converting all survivorship tenancies46 to tenancies-in-common.47 At the death of the first spouse, the bypass trust can then be funded with discounted undivided interests maximizing the use of the shelter. The funding of the QTIP share with an undivided interest will permit a discount in connection with the valuation of that interest at the death of the survivor.48

Fractionalizing a residence between spouses who both live there should not cause any transfer tax difficulty, but fractionalizing a residence between a donor-parent and a child may cause inclusion in the parent's estate as a retained interest under Code Section 2036 (a)(I).49

As noted at the beginning, annual exclusion gifts of undivided interests in real property leverage the exclusion and depress the value of the interest retained.50 Transfers of undivided interests in real property to minors can be made through the Virginia Uniform Transfers To Minors Act.51

With regard to the assessment of the tax risks associated with gifts of"sliver" undivided interests by the dying client, note should be taken of Estate of Murphy v. Commissioner,52 a much criticized case53 in which the Tax Court disallowed a minority discount for a 49.6 percent stock interest where decedent had given .9 percent of the stock to each of two children eighteen days before her death (reducing her holdings from 51.4 to 49.6 percent). In direct opposition to the Estate of Murphy decision and without mentioning it, the Tax Court in Estate of Frank v. Commissioner54 permitted a discount (combined 45%) for decedent's 32.14 percent block of stock remaining after he gave 18.16 percent of the stock to his wife just two days before his death, the transfers having been effected through a power of attorney held by decedent's son. The Frank case involved transfer of an 18.16 percent block rather than a 1.8 percent block of stock as in Murphy; however, it is difficult to see how this main distinguishing fact could produce opposite results.55 Since at worst death-bed gifts of undivided interests will be respected even if the discounts are disallowed, and at best discounts will be allowed on both the gifts and decedent's retained undivided interest, it is hard to see any downside with regard to this manner of gifting.

Where each spouse transfers a fractional interest in the family home to such spouse's qualified personal residence trust (QPRT),56 the value of the gift (the remainder interest) will be entitled to a discount. A single homeowner can get the same result by establishing two (or more) QPRTs each to contain a fractional interest in the home.57

Enhanced discounts for partnership interests in a family limited partnership (FLP) would be available where the FLP owns an undivided interest in real property as a tenant-in-common.

In making fractional interest gifts with encumbered property, the amount of the encumbrance may be deducted.58

Finally, planning consideration should be given to maximizing the number of co-tenants and decreasing the percentage retained as these factors may influence the size of the discount permitted.59

VII. Conclusion

The law is clear at present that a valuation discount is properly applicable both to the gift of an undivided interest in real property and to the valuation of an undivided interest in real property remaining in decedent's estate at death. Discounts in the 15 to 20 percent range involve little tax risk. It is expected that experienced discount appraisers familiar with the disadvantages of tenancies-in-common, including forced access and forced sale issues, will be utilized more frequently in the future resulting in increased discounts.

Transfer tax planning using fractional interest gifts is relatively inexpensive, simple and quick to implement and easy to explain and understand. Such planning is appropriate in a wider range of situations than more sophisticated techniques. As a result, use of and uses for this flexible planning tool will multiply."

Please do not hesitate to ask me any additional questions that you may have with regard to this matter. If you would be kind enough to rate my service positively so I will receive credit for my work I would appreciate it. The site does not credit the Attorneys unless the customer rates our service positively. Thank you for your consideration. Please let me know if you were unhappy with my service and I will opt out for another Attorney to assist you. Thank you for using JA! We appreciate your business.
Customer: replied 8 months ago.
This is all the information I need. Sounds like to need to get back with my attorney.

Would you be kind enough to rate my service positively so I will receive credit from the site for my work. Thank you.

Attyadvisor, Attorney
Category: Real Estate Law
Satisfied Customers: 7228
Experience: 29 years of experience in General Practice, Real Estate Law and Estate Law.
Attyadvisor and 2 other Real Estate Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 8 months ago.
absolutely. thanks for your help.

I think that people that do not have decades of real estate experience together with estate experience lack the ability to understand that 50% is not 50% in reality. Thank you.

My last link is a State Bar article that may assist your Attorney.

Customer: replied 8 months ago.
I agree. Even the estate attorney seems to not understand this concept and paid estate taxes based on the full 50% value. Thanks so much for your help.
Customer: replied 8 months ago.
Thanks for the article.

You are most welcome. Please feel free to request me in the future as it would be my pleasure to work with you. I am Attorney2.

Customer: replied 8 months ago.
I most definitely will. Thank you.

Thank you for using JA! We appreciate your business.