Real Estate Law

Have real estate law questions? Ask a real estate lawyer.

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

This answer was rated:

This is an easement or trespass question. I live in Jackson…

This is an easement or...
This is an easement or trespass question. I live in Jackson County Oregon in a rural area on a private road. Properties 1, 2, 3, and 4 lie north of mine between my residence and the public road. Property 6 lies south of mine and my property lies between property 6 and the public road. The owners of each of the 6 properties own the portion of the road that is on their property. Only the owner of property 6 has an ingress/egress easement across my portion of the road. No other owners have any easement rights across my property. My portion of the road is approximately one quarter mile long. Owner 6 does not live on the property and visits it infrequently.
Owner 1 wishes to use my portion of the road for walking his dog. I have required only that he have a collar on his dog and carry a leash in case the dog needs to be restrained for safety purposes and informed owner 1 that he has no permission to cross my property with his dog unless the dog is wearing a collar and owner 1 is carrying a leash. .
Owner 1 has refused to collar his dog and carry a leash and claims that he has and may actually have permission from owner 6 to check up on property 6 and therefore claims the right to take his dog with him across my portion of the road, uncollared and unleashed. Owner 1 is actually using this “permission” from owner 6 as a ruse to walk his dog on my portion of the road. The home on property 6 is, for the most part, not visible from my portion of the road but the land is. Owner 1 does not actually check up on property 6 but claims he does.
Can I require owner 1 to collar his dog and carry a leash? Is owner 1 trespassing if he does not. Can I exclude owner 1 from my property. What is the legal authority for your answers?
Jackson county has no leash law and requires only that dogs be “under control.”
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own Real Estate Law Question
Answered in 46 minutes by:
11/13/2010
socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: Real Estate Law
Satisfied Customers: 40,074
Experience: Attorney and Real Estate broker -- Retired
Verified
I have provided the relevant law concerning easements at the bottom of this answer. Parsing the "legaleze," the first question that you must resolve is: what does the easement grant actually state, and what would an objective person make of that grant?

If the easement is ambiguous, and states that the neighbor has a "right-of-way," then the reasonable interpretation, in my view, is that the neighbor can make use of the road to access his or her property, and to provide access for any other persons who reasonable require access.

In your case, your other neighbor claims to be checking up on the easement holder's property. If that is true, then that is a reasonable use of the easement, and you cannot prevent the neighbor, and/or his dog from using the easement. But, if the dog or the neighbor strays from the road, or does not actually access the easement holder's property, then the neighbor is trespassing, because he is not using the road for the purpose for which the easement was originally granted.

If I were in your shoes, I would contract the easement holder in writing and ask if he has engaged the other neighbor to watch his property. If the response is 'no," then the other neighbor is a trespasser, plain and simple. Or, if you can video the dog off of the easement road, then that too is trespassing, because the easement is only the road, and nowhere else on your property.

One other issue is that Oregon law generally requires property owners to post signs at routine intervals notifying potential trespassers that they are crossing onto your land. So, unless the road is fenced in (even just a single wire fence), and no trespassing signs are posted, then you will have difficulty proving a civil trespass, except by accident, which is not actionable in court except for actual damages.

Conversely, if you take all the precautions, and the neighbor is still tresspassing, then you can provide a written warning, and if the neighbor persists, you can call the police/sheriff and make a report -- or, sue the neighbor in small claims to discourage further trespassing.

Hope this helps.

Case Law:

[A]n easement holder can make only such use of an easement as is reasonably necessary to accomplish the purpose for which the easement is granted and the remaining dominion over the land upon which the easement lies continues with the servient landowner. Ericsson v. Braukman, 111 Or App 57, 824 P2d 1174, rev den 313 Or 210, 830 P2d 595 (1992).

"In construing an easement, our fundamental task is to discern the nature and scope of the easement's purpose and to give effect to that purpose in a practical manner." Watson v. Banducci, 158 Or App 223, 230, 973 P2d 395 (1999) (citing Bernards et ux. v. Link and Haynes, 199 Or 579, 593, 248 P2d 341 (1952), on reh'g 199 Or 579, 263 P2d 794 (1953)). In Tipperman v. Tsiatsos, 327 Or 539, 964 P2d 1015 (1998), the Supreme Court explained the legal principles that govern the proper construction of an easement:

"First, in [easement] cases, 't is the duty of the court to declare the meaning of what is written in the instrument.' Minto v. Salem Water Etc. Co., 120 Or 202, 210, 250 P 722 (1926). Further, the court will look beyond the wording of the instrument 'only where there is an uncertainty or ambiguity.' Fendall v. Miller, 99 Or 610, 619, 196 P 381 (1921). If the wording at issue is uncertain or ambiguous, then the court must determine the intent of the original parties by examining the relevant surrounding circumstances. Doyle v. Gilbert, 255 Or 563, 566, 469 P2d 624 (1970) * * *. Such circumstances include the purpose and nature of the easement, the circumstances existing at the time of the grant or reservation, and the manner in which the easement was used by the original parties." Id. at 544-45.
Ask Your Own Real Estate Law Question
Customer reply replied 7 years ago

part of my question remains unanswered. "can i require owner 1 to collar his dog and carry a leash?"

the easement to owner 6 reads for ingress/egress. what I understand from your answer is that 6 can authorize 1 to use his easement to the extent 6 could use it. if there is authority to impose a limitation on 6 that 6 must collar any dog and carry a leash in order to walk the dog on the easement, would not that also be a limitation on 1's dog walking? is there any authority for me to impose such a limitation on 6 and would it then apply to 1?

Since you stated that the county provides no ordinance concerning leashing of dogs, I'm taking you at your word, that there is no general legal authority to leash the dog.

What remains is that the only authority is that the neighbor is trespassing by permitting the dog to wander off the road. Put another way, if the neighbor is entitled to access the road to check on the easement holder's property, then bringing a dog with him is reasonably within the scope of the easement. That's how I would rule if I were sitting as a judge in the matter.

I would also order the dog leashed, because it's likely that it is wandering off of the road (that's what dogs do, after all).

However, this is all the sort of thing that would be hashed out in a court. You won't find any dispositive statutory authority that you could hand to the neighbor or to the sheriff. You have to catch the neighbor's dog wandering off the road, and then sue for trespass. Or, get a letter from the easement holder that the neighbor isn't authorized to watch the property.

Edited by socrateaser on 11/13/2010 at 7:38 AM EST
Ask Your Own Real Estate Law Question
Customer reply replied 7 years ago

yes I understand that if I could witness or better yet photo the dog off the road or 1 not actually setting foot on 6's property, then there's trespass. It seems to me though that easement law both precludes unreasonable interference by the servient tenant but also allows reasonable limitations, like for instance, the servient could impose a speed limit on vehicular traffic, so what I'm looking for is authority of the servient to impose reasonable limitations. Is there? thx

btw, what state do you practice in, are you licensed in?

I worked in Oregon for 12 years. I currently live in California.

Just for grins, I looked up the Jackson County Code. JCC § 612.09(c)(3) prohibits a dog from trespassing on the land of another. So, if you catch the dog running somewhere off the easement, then you can call animal control, because that's a misdemeanor.

But, there is no specific "collar" law.

The authority you're looking for doesn't exist. If it did, I would have provided it. I have access to all Oregon statutes, ordinances and case law.

Your issue is all within the reasonable discretion of a court of equity. If you want to deal with the situation, you will have to do as I suggest, or you'll just spin your wheels.
Ask Your Own Real Estate Law Question
Customer reply replied 7 years ago

ok so when no authority exists in one state, courts often look to the law of another. any U.S. authority for a right of the servient to impose limitations on the easement that do not unreasonably interfere with it?

 

know of any hungry lawyer who might want to take this in the medford OR area.

 

btw, I practiced IP and PI and GP in SD for 30 years. and I appreciate your help.

You don't need to go outside of Oregon for pursuasive case law, because there is binding precedent available in Oregon:
  • ...ordinarily, a "grantee [of an easement] is not restricted to the methods of use which were current at the time of the grant," but reasonably may change that use over time as long as the burden on the servient estate is not increased. Bernards et. ux. v. Link and Haynes, 199 Or 579, 593-97, 248 P2d 341, on reh'g 199 Or 605, 263 P2d 794 (1953). To restrict an easement grantee's use, the Supreme Court requires express language clearly imposing a use limitation or extrinsic evidence that the parties so intended. Jones v. Edwards, 219 Or 429, 433-35, 347 P2d 846 (1959). Where the language is equivocal and there is no evidence or only scant evidence of what the parties intended, as is true here, the Supreme Court gives an easement its ordinary scope, permitting the use reasonably to change with changing needs. Id.

Re hungry lawyers, I don't know any in the South. And, I wonder why you would want to spend the money. If I were prepared to start forking out legal fees, I would just offer the neighbor $500 to sign a contract agreeing to leash the dog.

But, I'm sort of an efficiency fanatic. Most people can be bribed into compliance for less than it costs to fight with them.

Nite.
socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: Real Estate Law
Satisfied Customers: 40,074
Experience: Attorney and Real Estate broker -- Retired
Verified
socrateaser and 87 other Real Estate Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Was this answer helpful?

How JustAnswer works

step-image
Describe your issueThe assistant will guide you
step-image
Chat 1:1 with a real estate lawyerLicensed Experts are available 24/7
step-image
100% satisfaction guaranteeGet all the answers you need
Ask socrateaser Your Own Question
socrateaser
socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: Real Estate Law
Satisfied Customers: 40,074
40,074 Satisfied Customers
Experience: Attorney and Real Estate broker -- Retired

socrateaser is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help.

Mary C.Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Barrister

Barrister

Lawyer

12,142 satisfied customers

17 years real estate, Realtor. Landlord 26 years

Infolawyer

Infolawyer

Lawyer

8,377 satisfied customers

Experienced lawyer

Ray

Ray

Lawyer

8,253 satisfied customers

Texas Attorney for 30 years dealing in real estate

LawTalk

LawTalk

Attorney

6,208 satisfied customers

I have 30 years legal experience. Additionally, in CA I held a Real Estate Broker's license.

Dimitry Esquire

Dimitry Esquire

Attorney

5,526 satisfied customers

JA Mentor, multiple jurisdictions, specialize in business/contract disputes, estate creation & admin

Ely

Ely

Counselor at Law

4,998 satisfied customers

Qualified attorney in private practice including business, family, criminal, and real estate issues.

P. Simmons

P. Simmons

Lawyer

3,572 satisfied customers

12+ yrs. of experience including real estate law.

< Previous | Next >

Related Real Estate Law Questions
Next door neighbor, famous rap star, has two large menacing
Next door neighbor, famous rap star, has two large menacing putt bulls that are unleashed and unfenced, and come into my back yard and my Children's back yards as well as other neighbors yards. My nei… read more
Barrister
Barrister
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
12,142 satisfied customers
I jest bought some property & found out the owner next to me
I jest bought some property & found out the owner next to me is driving across my property to get to his, He drives up on my driveway about 30 yards & turns on my land to edge of the woods about 20 ya… read more
Thomas Swartz
Thomas Swartz
Attorney
Juris Doctor
2,898 satisfied customers
My two tiny chihuahuas were attacked by the president of our
My two tiny chihuahuas were attacked by the president of our HOA. The president of the HOA has a dog that was unleashed. I confronted him and he said, "I have no intention of ever putting my dog on a … read more
Loren
Loren
578 satisfied customers
We are owners of approximately 1/2 mile of irrigation canal
We are owners of approximately 1/2 mile of irrigation canal ditch road that the Idaho Farmers Ditch company has an easement through. We have had numerous problems particularly with one neighbor at the… read more
Roger
Roger
Litigation Attorney
Doctoral Degree
26,935 satisfied customers
My landlords have an easement of necessity to the house in which I have an apartment. Whe
My landlords have an easement of necessity to the house in which I have an apartment. When I was walking home with my dog on the easement, a dog attacked us. The owner of the servient tenement insiste… read more
Attyadvisor
Attyadvisor
Doctoral Degree
8,265 satisfied customers
Greetings, I own a 3 acre property with a 50 ingress/egress
Greetings, I own a 3 acre property with a 50' ingress/egress esm't(stated on the deed) for an 11 acre property right behind mine. The property also has another easement to assess it from another stree… read more
Barrister
Barrister
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
12,142 satisfied customers
if an uninvited neighbor stops on owners property/easement
if an uninvited neighbor stops on owners property/easement and owners dog jumps on car and scratches the neighbors car is the owner responsible for neighbors damages?… read more
Lucy
Lucy
Juris Doctor
130 satisfied customers
I have a small farm in Southeast Arkansas. Its on a dirt road
I have a small farm in Southeast Arkansas. Its on a dirt road about 4 miles from the highway. The dirt road is maintained by the county for the first 3.5 miles. The last 1/2 mile the county condemned … read more
Law Pro
Law Pro
Doctoral Degree
19,000 satisfied customers
My HOA by laws state that our dog "Animals belonging to owners....kept
My HOA by laws state that our dog "Animals belonging to owners....kept on a leash being held by an individual capable of controlling the animal". We have had our dog professionally trained on an E-col… read more
P. Simmons
P. Simmons
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
3,572 satisfied customers
I was given an acre of land by my grandfather... It is Aires
I was given an acre of land by my grandfather... It is Aires land co owned by him and three brothers along with many more acres of land. So the land as a whole (30 acres) has an easement from another … read more
Barrister
Barrister
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
12,142 satisfied customers
I live in St. Marys County, Maryland. Because the road from
I live in St. Mary's County, Maryland. Because the road from which I aaccess my driveway was misplaced many years ago (>25) I have to cross a neighbors property to access mine. In fact the road its… read more
Seattle Scott
Seattle Scott
Private practice attorney
995 satisfied customers
We moved into a ground floor apartment inb Ada Mich 5/2011.
We moved into a ground floor apartment inb Ada Mich 5/2011. We got special permission to put in wireless invisible for our Bedlington terrier, nbow 10, because I have MS, I am a 58yr f, married 33 yea… read more
rvlaw
rvlaw
Judge
Juris Doctor
3,203 satisfied customers
I live on a private road in Guadelupe County, TX. There are
I live on a private road in Guadelupe County, TX. There are approximately 10 other residents who live on this road. We all use each others' property via easements to access the main road. One of our n… read more
ScottyMacEsq
ScottyMacEsq
Doctoral Degree
17,940 satisfied customers
This is a question about ingress and egress easements. In
This is a question about ingress and egress easements. In 2004 my mother-in-law executed three beneficiary deeds that would equally divide her property to her three children upon her death. Since parc… read more
Lucy
Lucy
Juris Doctor
130 satisfied customers
My neighbor has his drain tile that is connected to his sump
My neighbor has his drain tile that is connected to his sump run across my yard. It has caused pooling in my yard which was running like a river across my sidewalk. Two people walking their dogs have … read more
Lucy
Lucy
Juris Doctor
130 satisfied customers
Hello, I live in Newport Beach, CA. I have a Property
Hello, I live in Newport Beach, CA. I have a “Property Law” question. I have a small male dog (5 pounds); he is blind. We go for a long walk--one hour--every morning. I moved 8 months ago, and it took… read more
Dimitry Esquire
Dimitry Esquire
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
5,526 satisfied customers
I have an easement along with six other families across a bridge.
I have an easement along with six other families across a bridge. The owner of the bridge replaced (not repaired) the bridge and now expects me to pay 1/8 of the cost of replacement. Replacement cost … read more
KUMI95
KUMI95
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
17 satisfied customers
I own property in Wayne County, IN on a public road with R/W
I own property in Wayne County, IN on a public road with R/W signs along the road that 5 owners share. 1 owner doesn't want anyone to use the road and tired to close it twice, failed. for 2 yrs the co… read more
Barrister
Barrister
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
12,142 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x