Real Estate Law

Have Real Estate Law Questions? Ask a Real Estate Lawyer.

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

Real Estate Law

is North Carolina General Statute 136-68 the proceedure to

Customer Question
get a right-of-way to residential...
is North Carolina General Statute 136-68 the proceedure to get a right-of-way to residential property over land of a stranger when no Grantor/Grantee relationship exists; and is the term "cartway" synonymous with residential street?
Submitted: 8 years ago.Category: Real Estate Law
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own Real Estate Law Question
Answered in 2 hours by:
6/8/2009
Real Estate Lawyer: legaleagle, Lawyer replied 8 years ago
legaleagle
legaleagle, Lawyer
Category: Real Estate Law
Satisfied Customers: 13,441
Experience: Practicing Attorney for 10 years
Verified
Actually all that was sunsetted was the changes made in 1995 so that in 1997 the language reverts to the language before the 1995 changes. So it still applies to residential use because that was the meaning it has had for the last 200 years it was in existance. Cartway is not synoymous with residential street but more like a driveway for your use and your guests use to get to landlocked land. So yes you can sue that law to discontinue the cartway.
Ask Your Own Real Estate Law Question
Customer reply replied 8 years ago
I don't understand your last statement "So yes you can sue that law to discontinue the cartway", since I am considering the use of that statute to petition for a street( right-of-way) to a landlocked lot in a subdivision. It would be helpful to read that 1995 and 1997 versions of the law to better understand what was intended during that period.   
Real Estate Lawyer: legaleagle, Lawyer replied 8 years ago

I meant to say you can "use" the law with regard to residential cartways. Below is the bill from 1995 that shows the language in use from 1995 to 1997. The current version is the 1997 version.,

 

1995 N.C. ALS 513; 1995 N.C. Sess. Laws 513; 1995 N.C. Ch. 513; 1995 N.C. HB 545
BILL TRACKING SUMMARY FOR THIS DOCUMENT

SYNOPSIS: AN ACT TO BROADEN THE LAW PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CARTWAYS.

NOTICE:
[A> UPPERCASE TEXT WITHIN THESE SYMBOLS IS ADDED <A]
[D> Text within these symbols is deleted <D]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To view the next section, type .np* TRANSMIT.
To view a specific section, transmit p* and the section number. e.g. p*1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:

[*1] SECTION 1. G.S. 136-68 reads as rewritten:

"Section 136-68. Special proceeding for establishment, alteration or discontinuance of cartways, etc.; petition; appeal.

The establishment, alteration, or discontinuance of any cartway, church road, mill road, or like easement, for the benefit of any person, firm, association, or corporation, over the lands of another, shall be determined by a special proceeding instituted before the clerk of the superior court in the county where the property affected is situated. Such special proceeding shall be commenced by a petition filed with said clerk and the service of a copy thereof on the person or persons whose property will be affected thereby. From any final order or judgment in said special proceeding, any interested party may appeal to the superior court for [A> A JURY <A] trial de novo [A> ON ALL ISSUES INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO RELIEF, THE LOCATION OF A CARTWAY, TRAMWAY OR RAILWAY, AND THE ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES. <A] [D> and the <D] [A> THE <A] procedure established under Chapter [D> 40, <D] [A> 40A, <A] entitled 'Eminent Domain,' shall be followed in the conduct of such special proceeding insofar as the same is applicable and in harmony with the provisions of this section."

[*2] SEC. 2. G.S. 136-69 reads as rewritten:

"Section 136-69. Cartways, tramways, etc., laid out; procedure.

[D> If <D] [A> IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT ALL LANDOWNERS WHO DO NOT HAVE A DEEDED OR DOCUMENTED EASEMENT OR RIGHT-OF-WAY TO A PUBLIC ROAD SHALL HAVE A LEGAL MEANS OF OBTAINING ACCESS TO THAT ROAD, IF <A] any person, firm, association, or corporation shall be engaged in the cultivation of any land or the cutting and removing of any standing timber, or the working of any quarries, mines, or minerals, or the operating of any industrial or manufacturing plants, or public or private cemetery, [A> OR THE USE OF LAND AS A SINGLE-FAMILY HOMESTEAD, <A] or taking action preparatory to the operation of any such enterprises, to which there is leading no public [D> road <D] [A> ROAD, REASONABLE DEEDED OR DOCUMENTED EASEMENT OR RIGHT-OF-WAY TO A PUBLIC ROAD, <A] or other adequate means of transportation, other than a navigable waterway, affording necessary and proper means of ingress thereto and egress therefrom, such person, firm, association, or corporation may institute a special proceeding as set out in [D> the preceding section (G.S. 136-68), and if it shall <D] [A> G.S. 136-68. SHOULD IT <A] be made to appear to the court necessary, reasonable and just that such person shall have a private way to a public road or watercourse or railroad over the lands of other persons, the court shall appoint a jury of view of three disinterested freeholders to view the premises and lay off a cartway, tramway, or railway of not [D> less <D] [A> MORE <A] than 18 feet [D> in width, <D] [A> OF TRAVEL SURFACE OR SUCH OTHER MINIMUM WIDTH REQUESTED IN THE PETITION AND FOUND NECESSARY AND PROPER BY THE COURT, AND NOT MORE THAN 30 FEET IN WIDTH FOR CUTS, FILLS, AND DITCHES <A] or cableways, chutes, and [D> flumes, and <D] [A> FLUMES. IF A CARTWAY IS GRANTED FOR THE USE OF ONE OR MORE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMESTEADS, EACH SINGLE-FAMILY HOMESTEAD MUST CONSIST OF AT LEAST SEVEN ACRES OF LAND. WHERE THERE EXISTS A PRIVATE RAILROAD CROSSING, THAT PRIVATE RAILROAD CROSSING MAY BE USED AS PART OF A CARTWAY ESTABLISHED UNDER THIS ARTICLE PROVIDED THE PERSON, FIRM, ASSOCIATION OR CORPORATION SEEKING THE CARTWAY AGREES TO SHARE PROPORTIONATELY WITH OTHER LANDOWNERS AUTHORIZED TO USE THE CROSSING THE COST OF MAINTAINING THE PRIVATE CROSSING AND TO PROTECT AND HOLD HARMLESS THE RAILROAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE CROSSING, PROVIDED THE RAILROAD IS BEING OPERATED IN A LAWFUL MANNER AT OR IN THE VICINITY OF THE CROSSING. EXCEPT AS HEREIN PROVIDED FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CARTWAY OVER AN EXISTING PRIVATE RAILROAD CROSSING, NO REAL ESTATE, RIGHT-OF-WAY, EASEMENT, LEASEHOLD, OR OTHER INTEREST IN LAND WHICH HAS BEEN CONDEMNED BY A RAILROAD, OR HAS BEEN OBTAINED FOR A RAILROAD'S USE AS A RIGHT-OF-WAY, DEPOT, OR STATION HOUSE SHALL BE USED FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CARTWAY OR OTHER USE UNDER THIS ARTICLE EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH THE RAILROAD. SHOULD A PETITIONER SEEKING A CARTWAY REQUEST A NEW RAILROAD CROSSING, THE RAILROAD SHALL NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH THE LOCATION OF THE NEW CROSSING AT THE REQUESTED LOCATION OR SOME OTHER MUTUALLY AGREEABLE LOCATION. THE JURY OF VIEW SHALL <A] assess the damages the owner or owners of the land crossed may sustain thereby, and make report of their findings in writing to the clerk of the superior court. Exceptions to said report may be filed by any interested party and such exceptions shall be heard and determined by the clerk of the superior court. The clerk of the superior court may affirm or modify said report, or set the same aside and order a new jury of view. All damages assessed by a judgment of the clerk, together with the cost of the proceeding, shall be paid into the clerk's office before the petitioners shall acquire any rights under said proceeding.

Where a tract of land lies partly in one county and partly in an adjoining county, or where a tract of land lies wholly within one county and the public road nearest or from which the most practical roadway to said land would run, lies in an adjoining county and the practical way for a cartway to said land would lead over lands in an adjoining county, then and in that event the proceeding for the laying out and establishing of a cartway may be commenced in either the county in which the land is located or the adjoining county through which said cartway would extend to the public road, and upon the filing of such petition in either county the clerk of the court shall have jurisdiction to proceed for the appointment of a jury from the county in which the petition is filed and proceed for the laying out and establishing of a cartway as if the tract of land to be reached by the cartway and the entire length of the cartway are all located within the bounds of said county in which the petition may be filed. [A> A PERMISSIVE USE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT ACROSS THE LAND OF ANOTHER SHALL NOT BE A BAR TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CARTWAY UNDER THIS ARTICLE. IN DETERMINING THE PATH OF A CARTWAY, TRAMWAY OR RAILWAY THE JURY OF VIEW SHALL GIVE PRIORITY TO THE LOCATION OF PREVIOUSLY USED EASEMENTS OR CARTWAYS. <A] "

[*3] SEC. 3. G.S. 136-70 reads as rewritten:

"Section 136-70. Alteration or abandonment of cartways, etc., in same manner.

Cartways or other ways established under this Article or heretofore established, may be altered, changed, or abandoned in like manner as herein provided for their establishment upon petition instituted by any interested [D> party: Provided, that all cartways, tramways, or railways established for the removal of timber shall automatically terminate at the end of a period of five years, unless a greater time is set forth in the petition and the judgment establishing the same. <D] [A> PARTY. A CARTWAY ESTABLISHED UNDER THIS ARTICLE SHALL NOT TERMINATE UNTIL THE TIME SPECIFIED IN THE PETITION AND AS FOUND NECESSARY AND PROPER BY THE COURT. <A] "

[*3a] SEC. 3a. Compensation to the landowner for the establishment of a cartway over the property of another shall be as provided in Chapter 40A Article 4 of the North Carolina General Statutes.

[*4] SEC. 4. This act is effective upon ratification but sections 2 and 3 shall expire on July 1, 1997. This act applies to actions to establish cartways filed on or after the effective date, but before July 1, 1997.

In the General Assembly read three times and ratified this the 29th day of July, 1995.

HISTORY:
Approved July 29, 1995

SPONSOR:
Brown

 

§ 136-68. Special proceeding for establishment, alteration or discontinuance of cartways, etc.; petition; appeal

The establishment, alteration, or discontinuance of any cartway, church road, mill road, or like easement, for the benefit of any person, firm, association, or corporation, over the lands of another, shall be determined by a special proceeding instituted before the clerk of the superior court in the county where the property affected is situated. Such special proceeding shall be commenced by a petition filed with said clerk and the service of a copy thereof on the person or persons whose property will be affected thereby. From any final order or judgment in said special proceeding, any interested party may appeal to the superior court for a jury trial de novo on all issues including the right to relief, the location of a cartway, tramway or railway, and the assessment of damages. The procedure established under Chapter 40A, entitled "Eminent Domain," shall be followed in the conduct of such special proceeding insofar as the same is applicable and in harmony with the provisions of this section.

1879, c. 82, s. 9; Code, s. 2023; Rev., s. 2683; C.S., s. 3835; 1931, c. 448; 1995, c. 513, s. 1.

Ask Your Own Real Estate Law Question
Customer reply replied 8 years ago
I have an important interruption, but I will Accept your answer as soon as I can process the PAYPAL account.   Thanks for your help.                 Kind Regards    Customer
Real Estate Lawyer: legaleagle, Lawyer replied 8 years ago
Okay, Thank you.
Ask Your Own Real Estate Law Question
Customer reply replied 8 years ago
After reading the N. C. Bill and statutes, not being a lawyer, I can not say with certainity that the "cartway" Proceedure is applicable to residential property except it does address "persons" with access problems as well as "firms, associations, corporations, etc.;I need a more positive link identified that insures residential application since a local lawyer says it does not. Does being a Texas lawyer make it difficult for you to deal with North Carolina issues?               Thank you for all your help. I am back to finish this and will have time to process the PAYPAL pro0ceedure.   Kind Regards               Customer
Real Estate Lawyer: legaleagle, Lawyer replied 8 years ago

If your attorney does not advise using the cartway law then he should merely use an easement by necessity which is definitely for landlocked residential property. Below is case law.

 

"Although easements must generally be created in writing, courts will find the existence of an easement by implication under certain circumstances. J. Webster, Real Estate Law in North Carolina, [**863] § 280 at 346 (1971). HN1Go to the description of this Headnote.Easements are implied in two basic situations. In the first, an "easement by necessity" may be found, typically when land becomes [***6] landlocked after a sale or transfer. " Knott v. Washington Housing Authority, 70 N.C. App. 95

legaleagle
legaleagle, Lawyer
Category: Real Estate Law
Satisfied Customers: 13,441
Experience: Practicing Attorney for 10 years
Verified
legaleagle and 87 other Real Estate Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Customer reply replied 8 years ago
I can not afford an attorney, and statute 136-68 is a petition that does not require litigation, so that is the best way to go; but I need to confirm that it is applicable to residential property over the land of a stranger, where there is no Grantor/Grantee relationship; therefore the question remains as to the original question. Also, the legislation says that Sections 2&3 shall expire on july 1 , 1997....that seems to eliminate 136-69 and 136-70 which the lawyer says has to be included with 136-68.   PUZZLED and need help.    Customer
Real Estate Lawyer: legaleagle, Lawyer replied 8 years ago
Your option is to sue for an easment since you did not fall in the time frame to use the cartway law. Since you did not file your action before 1997 you have to sue for an easement.
Ask Your Own Real Estate Law Question
Customer reply replied 8 years ago
I am confused by your earlier ststement that the law has been in effect for 200 years, and was intended for residential matters from the begining. What resource supported that declaration? Now you imply that the law has expired, and I will have to sue for a right-of- way to a landlocked lot in a subdivision.
Customer reply replied 8 years ago
Since there is two conflicting answers to my original question, I need more information to resolve my original matter of concern.                     Kind Regards      Customer
Real Estate Lawyer: legaleagle, Lawyer replied 8 years ago
Sorry for the delay. I have a hearing today so I will get back to you this afternoon or this evening, I promise. Thank you for your understanding.
Ask Your Own Real Estate Law Question
Real Estate Lawyer: legaleagle, Lawyer replied 8 years ago


This is the change made to the law in HB(NNN) NNN-NNNN The change to remove the residential component after 1997 is because the cartway law uses the state's eminent domain rights and the state decided it should not be used for residential purposes. So you will have to get a private easement from any landlord you need to cross to get to a road due to the changes in this law. The information I read was explaining why they made the changes in 1995, I thought it was general, so it only applied for the 2 years the law was changed.

NOTICE:
[A> UPPERCASE TEXT WITHIN THESE SYMBOLS IS ADDED <A]
[D> Text within these symbols is deleted <D]

"Section 136-68. Special proceeding for establishment, alteration or discontinuance of cartways, etc.; petition; appeal.

The establishment, alteration, or discontinuance of any cartway, church road, mill road, or like easement, for the benefit of any person, firm, association, or corporation, over the lands of another, shall be determined by a special proceeding instituted before the clerk of the superior court in the county where the property affected is situated. Such special proceeding shall be commenced by a petition filed with said clerk and the service of a copy thereof on the person or persons whose property will be affected thereby. From any final order or judgment in said special proceeding, any interested party may appeal to the superior court for [A> A JURY <A] trial de novo [A> ON ALL ISSUES INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO RELIEF, THE LOCATION OF A CARTWAY, TRAMWAY OR RAILWAY, AND THE ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES. <A] [D> and the <D] [A> THE <A] procedure established under Chapter [D> 40, <D] [A> 40A, <A] entitled 'Eminent Domain,' shall be followed in the conduct of such special proceeding insofar as the same is applicable and in harmony with the provisions of this section."

"Section 136-69. Cartways, tramways, etc., laid out; procedure.

[D> If <D] [A> IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT ALL LANDOWNERS WHO DO NOT HAVE A DEEDED OR DOCUMENTED EASEMENT OR RIGHT-OF-WAY TO A PUBLIC ROAD SHALL HAVE A LEGAL MEANS OF OBTAINING ACCESS TO THAT ROAD, IF <A] any person, firm, association, or corporation shall be engaged in the cultivation of any land or the cutting and removing of any standing timber, or the working of any quarries, mines, or minerals, or the operating of any industrial or manufacturing plants, or public or private cemetery, [A> OR THE USE OF LAND AS A SINGLE-FAMILY HOMESTEAD, <A] or taking action preparatory to the operation of any such enterprises, to which there is leading no public [D> road <D] [A> ROAD, REASONABLE DEEDED OR DOCUMENTED EASEMENT OR RIGHT-OF-WAY TO A PUBLIC ROAD, <A] or other adequate means of transportation, other than a navigable waterway, affording necessary and proper means of ingress thereto and egress therefrom, such person, firm, association, or corporation may institute a special proceeding as set out in [D> the preceding section (G.S. 136-68), and if it shall <D] [A> G.S. 136-68. SHOULD IT <A] be made to appear to the court necessary, reasonable and just that such person shall have a private way to a public road or watercourse or railroad over the lands of other persons, the court shall appoint a jury of view of three disinterested freeholders to view the premises and lay off a cartway, tramway, or railway of not [D> less <D] [A> MORE <A] than 18 feet [D> in width, <D] [A> OF TRAVEL SURFACE OR SUCH OTHER MINIMUM WIDTH REQUESTED IN THE PETITION AND FOUND NECESSARY AND PROPER BY THE COURT, AND NOT MORE THAN 30 FEET IN WIDTH FOR CUTS, FILLS, AND DITCHES <A] or cableways, chutes, and [D> flumes, and <D] [A> FLUMES. IF A CARTWAY IS GRANTED FOR THE USE OF ONE OR MORE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMESTEADS, EACH SINGLE-FAMILY HOMESTEAD MUST CONSIST OF AT LEAST SEVEN ACRES OF LAND. WHERE THERE EXISTS A PRIVATE RAILROAD CROSSING, THAT PRIVATE RAILROAD CROSSING MAY BE USED AS PART OF A CARTWAY ESTABLISHED UNDER THIS ARTICLE PROVIDED THE PERSON, FIRM, ASSOCIATION OR CORPORATION SEEKING THE CARTWAY AGREES TO SHARE PROPORTIONATELY WITH OTHER LANDOWNERS AUTHORIZED TO USE THE CROSSING THE COST OF MAINTAINING THE PRIVATE CROSSING AND TO PROTECT AND HOLD HARMLESS THE RAILROAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE CROSSING, PROVIDED THE RAILROAD IS BEING OPERATED IN A LAWFUL MANNER AT OR IN THE VICINITY OF THE CROSSING. EXCEPT AS HEREIN PROVIDED FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CARTWAY OVER AN EXISTING PRIVATE RAILROAD CROSSING, NO REAL ESTATE, RIGHT-OF-WAY, EASEMENT, LEASEHOLD, OR OTHER INTEREST IN LAND WHICH HAS BEEN CONDEMNED BY A RAILROAD, OR HAS BEEN OBTAINED FOR A RAILROAD'S USE AS A RIGHT-OF-WAY, DEPOT, OR STATION HOUSE SHALL BE USED FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CARTWAY OR OTHER USE UNDER THIS ARTICLE EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH THE RAILROAD. SHOULD A PETITIONER SEEKING A CARTWAY REQUEST A NEW RAILROAD CROSSING, THE RAILROAD SHALL NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH THE LOCATION OF THE NEW CROSSING AT THE REQUESTED LOCATION OR SOME OTHER MUTUALLY AGREEABLE LOCATION. THE JURY OF VIEW SHALL <A] assess the damages the owner or owners of the land crossed may sustain thereby, and make report of their findings in writing to the clerk of the superior court. Exceptions to said report may be filed by any interested party and such exceptions shall be heard and determined by the clerk of the superior court. The clerk of the superior court may affirm or modify said report, or set the same aside and order a new jury of view. All damages assessed by a judgment of the clerk, together with the cost of the proceeding, shall be paid into the clerk's office before the petitioners shall acquire any rights under said proceeding.

Where a tract of land lies partly in one county and partly in an adjoining county, or where a tract of land lies wholly within one county and the public road nearest or from which the most practical roadway to said land would run, lies in an adjoining county and the practical way for a cartway to said land would lead over lands in an adjoining county, then and in that event the proceeding for the laying out and establishing of a cartway may be commenced in either the county in which the land is located or the adjoining county through which said cartway would extend to the public road, and upon the filing of such petition in either county the clerk of the court shall have jurisdiction to proceed for the appointment of a jury from the county in which the petition is filed and proceed for the laying out and establishing of a cartway as if the tract of land to be reached by the cartway and the entire length of the cartway are all located within the bounds of said county in which the petition may be filed. [A> A PERMISSIVE USE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT ACROSS THE LAND OF ANOTHER SHALL NOT BE A BAR TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CARTWAY UNDER THIS ARTICLE. IN DETERMINING THE PATH OF A CARTWAY, TRAMWAY OR RAILWAY THE JURY OF VIEW SHALL GIVE PRIORITY TO THE LOCATION OF PREVIOUSLY USED EASEMENTS OR CARTWAYS. <A] "

SEC. 4. This act is effective upon ratification but sections 2 and 3 shall expire on July 1, 1997. This act applies to actions to establish cartways filed on or after the effective date, but before July 1, 1997.

 

Ask Your Own Real Estate Law Question
Customer reply replied 8 years ago
I hate to beat a dead horse, but I need to know what resource was used to support your statement that "So it still applies to residential use because that was the meaning it had for the last 200 years it was in existance". I can use that resource reference in my studies and not hold you accountable, and I assume you did not fabricate that on your own. But if you did I need to know. furthermore, J. Webster's book "REAL ESTATE LAW IN NORTH CAROLINA" states "If the Grantor-Grantee relationship is not present and an owner has no access to a public road, his remedy is to proceed under the statutory provisions for the establishment of a "CARTWAY", NC general statute 136-68 and 136-69.;that being part of #15-13 in the book that discusses RIGHTS IN THE LANDS OF OTHERS, EASEMENTS AND PROFITS. Kind Regards   Customer
Real Estate Lawyer: legaleagle, Lawyer replied 8 years ago
"75 N.C.L. Rev. 1943" It was a NC law reveiw article which spoke about the increased use of cartway to residential reasons in 1995..
Ask Your Own Real Estate Law Question
Customer reply replied 8 years ago
My network interface card in my computer failed around noon on the 13 of june ,just after I replyed to you that morning; therefore I have been unable to receive from anyone or send any messages. Thank you for your reply. Sorry about the delay in acknowledging your answer. I hope that closes my study on the subject; but I need to read that reference you gave me before I know for sure. Thought you deserved to know what was going on here. The lawyer I mentioned earlier was just another source input for my study; the one that said the law had expired. I am still reading that 1995 law, trying to come to a conclusion of my own.   Thank you for all your help.     Kind Regards     Customer   06/15/2009
Ask legaleagle Your Own Question
legaleagle
legaleagle
legaleagle, Lawyer
Category: Real Estate Law
Satisfied Customers: 13,441
13,441 Satisfied Customers
Experience: Practicing Attorney for 10 years

legaleagle is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help.

Mary C.Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Tina

Tina

Lawyer

5,436 satisfied customers

17 years of legal experience including real estate law.

Barrister

Barrister

Lawyer

10,826 satisfied customers

16 years real estate, Realtor. Landlord 26 years

Infolawyer

Infolawyer

Lawyer

7,657 satisfied customers

Experienced lawyer

Ray

Ray

Lawyer

7,367 satisfied customers

Texas Attorney for 30 years dealing in real estate

LawTalk

LawTalk

Attorney

6,207 satisfied customers

I have 30 years legal experience. Additionally, in CA I held a Real Estate Broker's license.

Dimitry Esquire

Dimitry Esquire

Attorney

5,526 satisfied customers

JA Mentor, multiple jurisdictions, specialize in business/contract disputes, estate creation & admin

Ely

Ely

Counselor at Law

4,899 satisfied customers

Qualified attorney in private practice including business, family, criminal, and real estate issues.

< Previous | Next >

Related Real Estate Law Questions
My real estate agent and i completed a real estate
my real estate agent and i completed a real estate transaction back in November of 2007. there has been a problem with the transaction and i would like to take her to small claims court. however, i wa… read more
Dave Kennett
Dave Kennett
Doctoral Degree
25,741 satisfied customers
I need a real estate lawyer. I have a house in Los Angeles
i have a house in Los Angeles and another home in TX TX home is my primary residence and LA home is rented … read more
Barrister
Barrister
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
10,826 satisfied customers
Last real estate question I have... I've been in my house
ok, last real estate question I have... I've been in my house for about 1.5 years. During the 1 year walk-through I had requested the builder fix some cracking where a retaining wall joins the house. … read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
7,367 satisfied customers
I need a real estate lawyer. I have a house in Los Angeles
i have a house in Los Angeles and another home in TX TX home is my primary residence and LA home is rented … read more
socrateaser
socrateaser
1,031 satisfied customers
In commercial Ohio real estate is their such an agreement as
In commercial Ohio real estate is their such an agreement as a NNN lease that is also a land contract installment which offers some type of equity ownership during or after the lease terms ?… read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
Looking for a Real Estate Lawyer to come out and talk with
Looking for a Real Estate Lawyer to come out and talk with our community about HOA. The builder of our homes just turn over everything to the community with really explaining anything. We are look for… read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
I have a real estate question related to Florida Real Estate
I have a real estate question related to Florida Real Estate law. … read more
LegalKnowledge
LegalKnowledge
Juris Doctor
27,509 satisfied customers
I have a real estate question. NC. About an easement
I have a real estate question JA: Because real estate law varies from place to place, can you tell me what state this is in? Customer: NC JA: Has any paperwork been filed? Customer: No JA: Anything el… read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
5,959 satisfied customers
I'm not sure this is in the realm of real estate law or
I'm not sure this is in the realm of real estate law or property rights. In any event my neighbor has landscaping and one large pine tree that is continually shedding into my pool and surrounding pati… read more
LegalKnowledge
LegalKnowledge
Juris Doctor
27,509 satisfied customers
We were told that our house was bought by a real estate
we were told that our house was bought by a real estate company after our bankrupcy case was dismissed we had a realtor come to the house and tell us that we are going to have to get out we have not r… read more
Damien Bosco
Damien Bosco
2,998 satisfied customers
I have a real estate related question. Missouri. House has
House has been sold. Buyer is coming back to me as the seller and asking for money for repairs.… read more
Barrister
Barrister
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
10,826 satisfied customers
Real estate law I'm the seller i signed real estate contract
Real estate law I'm the seller i signed real estate contract now i dont want to sell I initialed the contract instead of signing the sale price was illegible so the seller sent an amendment for me to … read more
Damien Bosco
Damien Bosco
2,998 satisfied customers
Texas real estate lawyer: Texas Real Estate Title Question
Texas Real Estate Title Question1. H&W hold title JT WROS to a single family home. Their homestead which has been designated by Harris County as their homestead. 2. County allowed Over 65 exemption in addition to homestead exemption since 20133. Large judgment against H only in favor of federal govt was filed in 2000 or 2001 in Harris County4. Title history: a. H&W married since 1990 b. Property purchased by W only in 2003 and homestead exemption in effect in W's name only from 2004 to 2013 c. A “bogus” (wife never signed it) warranty deed was recorded in 2012 purportedly transferring title to homestead from W to H&W JTWROS.5. W is now 62 and H is 776. Does judgment against H only create a title objection if H&W want to obtain a mortgage or sell the house?7. If H deeds property “back” to W does judgment “go away” as a title exception?8. If H dies before W, does the judgment “go away” as a title exception allowing W to sell property?9. Assuming the answer to # 7 is no, then can W file a lawsuit in District court to have the bogus deed stricken/declared null and void? If so, what is the name of the lawsuit, i.e. an action to strike a deed or set aside or _____?10. In such a lawsuit would H be the only defendant necessary?11. Once it is filed, to save time can H file a consent to entry of a judgment declaring the bogus deed null & void?Thank you. … read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
7,367 satisfied customers
In eminent domain of private residences, isn't the property
in eminent domain of private residences, isn't the property owner excluded from paying Capital gains? … read more
LegalGems
LegalGems
Juris Doctorate
10,196 satisfied customers
Real estate law: Statute limitation on easement in
Real estate law: Statute limitation on easement in California: Previous owner granted Easement to next door neighbor In 1985. I bought this lot in 1999. Is there statute limitation which and the easem… read more
Alex Esquire
Alex Esquire
Managing Attorney
Doctoral Degree
153 satisfied customers
Caltrans took mo home of 35 years by eminent domaine in 93.
Caltrans took mo home of 35 years by eminent domaine in 93. I transferred my basis to a new house which is too big for meto handle at 80. Can I transfer my basis into a lesser house without triggering… read more
Michael Bradley
Michael Bradley
JD
1,131 satisfied customers
Real Estate question regarding easement. I own property in
Real Estate question regarding easement. I own property in Ca which has been used for over 100 years but we've found it never had a deeded easement, or at least none that can be found. We cross two pr… read more
Infolawyer
Infolawyer
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
7,657 satisfied customers
Seeking a real estate attorney in RE: Property Easements. My
Seeking a real estate attorney in Washington RE: Property Easements. My neighbors are asking me to sign a legal document, well utility company is technically, for a easement and right of way before th… read more
LawTalk
LawTalk
Attorney
Juris Doctor
6,207 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x