Personal Injury Law

Personal Injury Law Question? Ask Personal Injury Lawyers.

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

Personal Injury Law
This answer was rated:

REGARDS TO MY MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LAWSUIT EXCUSE examines

THIS IS IN REGARDS *****...
THIS IS IN REGARDS ***** ***** MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LAWSUITEXCUSE examines the unique predicament of the doctor whose conduct is in question.
>
EXCUSE focuses on the “actor.”.
>
DEFENSE-MATTER REMAINS IN THE REALM OF SPECULATION
>
Dr. S. CANNOT say that the Matter Remains In The Realm Of Speculation or Conjecture as a defense BECAUSE the ONLY “Realm Of Reality” was, In the Most ABSOLUTE Sense, Dr S’s NEGLIGENT CONDUCT, that flowed naturally as being 100 % of the Direct and Proximate causes that resulted in BREACHING His Contractual Obligation with ME and establishing His LEGAL LIABILITY for the AGGRAVATION of My Pre-Existing Condition
>
is what I wrote correct?
>
or please write what i need to say
>
THANK YOU
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own Personal Injury Law Question
Answered in 6 days by:
10/18/2017
Law Educator, Esq.
Category: Personal Injury Law
Satisfied Customers: 119,442
Experience: Licensed Attorney. Over 20 years experience in personal injury and law enforcement.
Verified

Thank you for your question. I look forward to working with you to provide you the information you are seeking for educational purposes only.

Ask Your Own Personal Injury Law Question

You can say just what you said as part of your argument, BUT you would need to support that statement above with medical expert testimony. If you cannot support that contention with medical expert testimony the defendant will seek to have it stricken by the court as "mere conjecture and self serving statements without required expert support," which is the statement they use when claims are not proven in accordance with the malpractice requirements.

Please do not forget to leave positive feedback by clicking on the 5 stars at the top of your page, as the experts are not employees of the site and get no credit for spending time with customers unless they leave positive feedback. Thank you.

Ask Your Own Personal Injury Law Question
Customer reply replied 30 days ago
THANK YOU for your answer.
>
Right now , i am preparing the notice of intent ( the shot across the bow) which is a non-legal document, so I have some latitude here, Along with dazzling them with brilliance I also want to baffle them with a little bit of bulls***.
>
Understanding that should this case move forward that an expert witness and his/her testimony will be require, , But until then
>
DEFENSE-MATTER REMAINS IN THE REALM OF SPECULATION
>
Dr. S. CANNOT say that the Matter Remains In The Realm Of Speculation or Conjecture as a defense BECAUSE
>
IT WAS Dr S, HIMSELF, WHO DIAGNOSED ME WITH Cervical Spondylosis Myelopathy (CSM)
>
and In the Most ABSOLUTE Sense,It was Dr S's,NEGLIGENT CONDUCT, that flowed naturally as being 100 % of the Direct and Proximate causes that resulted in BREACHING His Contractual Obligation with ME and establishing His LEGAL LIABILITY
>
That he made NO attempt to call me and Expended ZERO effort to contact me to discuss prioritizing my canceled surgery
>
That he decided BY HIMSELF, to Delay my Treatment (surgery) for 27 UN-Explained days, That was TOTALLY
UN-Acceptable to me
>
and during that period, my CSM caused an AGGRAVATION (worsening) of My Pre-Existing Condition, Such that it will never return to its pre-existing state
>
Does this have more bite?
>
THANK YOU

Thank you for your reply.

You do have more latitude in the notice of intent, but I can tell you that if you do not have an expert report they will ignore the letter of intent. I would tell you from defending these cases that we ignored any claims not supported by some medical support and documentation. So, you need to have some type of support for all of the allegations you are making above.

Again, you are making your own conclusory statements, you need to give more support to those statements or the provider will ignore your notice of claim.

Please do not forget to leave positive feedback by clicking on the 5 stars at the top of your page, as the experts are not employees of the site and get no credit for spending time with customers unless they leave positive feedback. Thank you.

Ask Your Own Personal Injury Law Question
Customer reply replied 15 days ago
SORRY FOR MY DELAYED RESPONSE
>
My NOI ( NEGLIGENT CONDUCT- 1) BREACH OF CONTRACT...2) 27 UNEXPLAINED DAYS IN DELAYING MY TREATMENT (SURGERY)
>
INJURY- PERMANENT AGGRAVATION OF A PREEXISTING CONDITION
>
I know that quantity is not always quality , but ASSUME (DANGEROUS WORD) that mine is
>
-42 primary doctor MR
-9 primary doctor MR PSYCHS
-6 hospital MR,
-5 officials communications between me and the hospital,
-4 surgeon's consultation notes
-18 PAGES OF RX
>
If this goes to trial I will have collected over 100 peer to peer scholarly journal articles and research papers that support my position
>
Max Medical Improvement reached 1/16/2017
>
-2 self reporting evaluations based on 10 medically recognized "self reporting evaluations",
>
-a "projected" SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR of 85% - The Substantial Factor in causing harm is a factor that a reasonable person would consider having contributed to the harm. It must be more than a remote or trivial factor; an event which is closest to, or immediately RESPONSIBLE for causing, some observed result. In a MEDICAL MALPRACTICE lawsuit, the “cause in fact” is the condition, action, or object that caused the plaintiff's injuries. The cause in fact may have caused the entire injury or only a part of it. When the defendant's behavior created the cause in fact, the defendant is be liable for NEGLIGENCE .
>
The SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR assesses the relative magnitudes of the preexisting probability of recovery (Pb) and the probability of recovery after the negligent action (Pa)
>,
-a "LOSS CHANCE" projected 85% - law is invited to assess hypothetical outcomes, either affecting ME where Dr. S’s BREACH of Contract or of the duty of care for the purposes of Dr. S's Negligent Conduct, Delay In Surgery. deprived me of the opportunity to obtain a benefit and/or avoid a loss. OF MORE THAN 50% and/or AVOID A LOSS of more than 50%
>
I must demonstrate that the lost opportunity itself, rather than the physical harm, “more probably than not” resulted from the asserted Dr. S's NEGLIGENT CONDUCT, DELAY IN TREATMENT (SURGERY)
>
the "BUT FOR" TEST -“BUT FOR” Dr. S and HFHosp; that their NEGLIGENT CONDUCT Produced Consequences Without the Intervention of Any Independent, Unforeseen Cause Without Which the Worsening of My CSM PERMANENT DYSESTHESIA a WOULD NOT Have Occurred. .
>
"PROXIMATE CAUSE" TEST show NO intervening or outside influences - , that their NEGLIGENT CONDUCT Produced Consequences Without the Intervention of Any Independent, Unforeseen Cause, Without Which the Injuries Would NOT Have Occurred.
>
YA THINK MAYBE I CAN NAIL HIS A** ?!
>
AS ALWAYS THANK YOU
Customer reply replied 15 days ago
CSM (CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS MYELOPATHY)
>
:PS- “Beyond A Reasonable Doubt”
>
Proving Dr. Ss NEGLIGENT CONDUCT, requires my “PROOF” to be at the LOWEST Standard Of Proof, “Preponderance Of The Evidence”.
>
This means there just has to be enough evidence to make MY TRUTH 51% MORE BELIEVABLE THAN Dr. S's TRUTH that Dr s's NEGLIGENT CONDUCT, Caused The Foreseeable, Avoidable And Harmful Aggravation Of My Pre-Existing CSM
>
My NOI PROVED Dr. S's NEGLIGENT CONDUCT at the HIGHEST STANDARD Of Proof And Of Evidence
“BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT”
>
My NOI PROVED that the ONLY LOGICAL EXPLANATION that can be derived from the facts is that Dr. S’s NEGLIGENT CONDUCT caused my aggravation and that NO OTHER LOGICAL EXPLANATION can be inferred or deduced from the evidence..
>
An ABSOLUTE or mathematical certainty is NOT needed; ONLY A MORAL CERTAINTY.
>
However, My NOI PROVED, both in an ABSOLUTE mathematical certainty and in an ABSOLUTE moral certainty. that Dr. S NEGLIGENT CONDUCT Caused The Foreseeable, Avoidable And Harmful Aggravation Of My Pre-Existing CSM Condition
>
AS ALWAYS THANK YOU
>
PPS- My NOI was 153 pages of evidence and 354 pages of official relevant documentation (annexures).
Customer reply replied 15 days ago
after your response i will close this out and tip
>
thank you

Thank you for your reply.

You can call it what you like, breach of contract, delays in care, but the facts you are alleging all describe negligent conduct and as such you are talking about medical malpractice. It is not the label you choose to put on it, but the facts of your case place it into that category even though you are trying hard to avoid it.

Peer to peer scholarly research journal articles and papers are considered "hearsay" in court under the Rules of Evidence, because they cannot be cross examined and because the court requires any expert posing such opinions to testify in court.

Self reporting is not necessarily proof of anything, because the court considers that biased and self serving claims of the reporter.

I am not saying you have no case, on the contrary, I am saying you have a case and you are about to hurt your case by not treating it as what it truly is from your facts above, medical malpractice, which means you must have a medical expert testifying and all of the things you have above aside from your medical records would not be overly helpful to your case because they are hearsay.

Please do not forget to leave positive feedback by clicking on the 5 stars at the top of your page, as the experts are not employees of the site and get no credit for spending time with customers unless they leave positive feedback. Thank you.

Law Educator, Esq.
Category: Personal Injury Law
Satisfied Customers: 119,442
Experience: Licensed Attorney. Over 20 years experience in personal injury and law enforcement.
Verified
Law Educator, Esq. and 87 other Personal Injury Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Ask Law Educator, Esq. Your Own Question
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq., Attorney
Category: Personal Injury Law
Satisfied Customers: 119,442
119,442 Satisfied Customers
Experience: Licensed Attorney. Over 20 years experience in personal injury and law enforcement.

Law Educator, Esq. is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help.

Mary C.Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Infolawyer

Infolawyer

Attorney

1,138 satisfied customers

Licensed attorney helping individuals and businesses.

Ely

Ely

Counselor at Law

718 satisfied customers

Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.

LawTalk

LawTalk

Attorney

485 satisfied customers

I have 30 years of legal and litigation experience.

Dimitry K., Esq.

Dimitry K., Esq.

Attorney

449 satisfied customers

I provide basic personal injury advice to my clients in my own practice.

Tina

Tina

Attorney

390 satisfied customers

Personal Injury & Wrongful Death experience includes judgment for $10M & $3M settlement

Brandon, Esq.

Brandon, Esq.

Attorney

367 satisfied customers

Has received a certificate of recognition from the California State Senate for his outstanding legal service.

P. Simmons

P. Simmons

Attorney

264 satisfied customers

16 yrs. of legal experience.

< Previous | Next >

Related Personal Injury Law Questions
ONLY > The Resulting PERMANENT “DYSESTHESIA” Is So
FOR Seattle Scott ONLY > The Resulting PERMANENT “DYSESTHESIA” Is So Physically Debilitating, My Dysesthesia Manifests Itself As A PERMANENT Debilitating “Burning” Pain In Both Hands With A Constan… read more
Seattle Scott
Seattle Scott
Private practice attorney
970 satisfied customers
I was wondering whether personal liability forms are
Hi, I was wondering whether personal liability forms are bindings for tree removal in WA state … read more
LawGuy
LawGuy
Juris Doctor
123 satisfied customers
One summer, Baxter and his wife,, were on their new boat
One summer, David Baxter and his wife, Melissa, were on their new boat with another couple, tubing on the Mississippi river. David and the other couple had been drinking all day, "about seven or eight… read more
JaneLS,Esq.
JaneLS,Esq.
14 satisfied customers
402.319(2) Misrepresentation and negligence or intentional
402.319(2) Misrepresentation and negligence or intentional act resulting in great bodily harm, permanent disfiguration, permanent disability or death. The previous owner and mortgage company did not d… read more
socrateaser
socrateaser
1,031 satisfied customers
Around Oct 11, 2008 a daycare that my son (14months old)
Around Oct 11, 2008 a daycare that my son (14months old) attended, was found neglegent while he was in there care. He sustained a buckled fracture of his right wrist. They neglected to inform me as th… read more
Tina
Tina
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
390 satisfied customers
My son while at work was asked by the owner of the company
My son while at work was asked by the owner of the company to run an errand on behalf of the company. When exiting the property he hit another vehicle. Both vehicles were on what is considered private… read more
TJ, Esq.
TJ, Esq.
Juris Doctor (JD)
11,188 satisfied customers
Could you tell me I leased a motel 3 years ago. per the
could you tell me I leased a motel 3 years ago. per the lease agrement i would pay the owner of the motel the inc preminion i was robbed and beatin real bad on oct 09 i have nbeen dignose with pstd is… read more
RJ
RJ
JD
3,048 satisfied customers
My son was shot in the nose at school with a pellet gun. He
My son was shot in the nose at school with a pellet gun. He suffered no real injury other than a red bruise. Can I sue the school for anything, possibly neglect?… read more
RJ
RJ
JD
3,048 satisfied customers
A well known was arrested while in the commission of an act
A well known prostitute was arrested while in the commission of an act of prostitution in a vehicle.During the arrest, the police officer grabbed her and she resisted. The officer put her into what wa… read more
RJ
RJ
JD
3,048 satisfied customers
Negligence leading to mental abuse follow by related health
Negligence leading to mental abuse follow by related health issues. … read more
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Attorney
119,442 satisfied customers
Can Gross Negligence overcome charitable immunity for a
Can Gross Negligence overcome charitable immunity for a medical malpractice case? The limit is in NJ is $250,000 and I am wondering if Gross Negligence in a medical malpractice case will allow me to s… read more
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Attorney
119,442 satisfied customers
REGARDS TO MY MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LAWSUIT EXCUSE examines
THIS IS IN REGARDS ***** ***** MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LAWSUITEXCUSE examines the unique predicament of the doctor whose conduct is in question. > EXCUSE focuses on the “actor.”. > DEFENSE-MATTER RE… read more
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Attorney
119,442 satisfied customers
Elderly woman asked for coffee. Flight attendant handed her
Elderly woman asked for coffee. Flight attendant handed her a cup of coffee & as she attempted to unlatch the tray there was sudden movement causing the hot coffee to spill on her lap causing severe b… read more
LegalPro54
LegalPro54
Doctoral Degree
1,258 satisfied customers
Which Calif. Laws, defined hospital negligence; which define
Second opinion] Which Calif. Laws, defined hospital negligence; which define hospital substandard care?… read more
Infolawyer
Infolawyer
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
1,138 satisfied customers
Can I sue a dentist for negligence and malpractice within
Can I sue a dentist for negligence and malpractice within the Veterans Administration? … read more
Infolawyer
Infolawyer
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
1,138 satisfied customers
I would like to bring a negligence claim against my son's
I would like to bring a negligence claim against my son's doctors. He suffered a tear to his penile region after the doctor tried to pull his circumcision ring off him and it it had grown into his ski… read more
TJ, Esq.
TJ, Esq.
Juris Doctor (JD)
11,188 satisfied customers
What is the "physical injury" aspect of negligent infliction
What is the "physical injury" aspect of negligent infliction of emotional distress? I've read that it's not simply sleepliness or stress related but what exactly needs to happen in order for the charg… read more
LegalPro54
LegalPro54
Doctoral Degree
1,258 satisfied customers
IF A DOCTOR IS NEGLIGENT AND TRIES TO COVER IT UP IN NOTES
IF A DOCTOR IS NEGLIGENT AND TRIES TO COVER IT UP IN NOTES AND MEDICAL RECORDS ....WHAT IS THE WORD I WOULD BE LOOKING FOR ..AS FAR AS THE COVER IT UP??… read more
LawGuy
LawGuy
Juris Doctor
123 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x