Personal Injury Law

Personal Injury Law Question? Ask Personal Injury Lawyers.

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

Personal Injury Law
This answer was rated:

There are those who say, as did Justice (then Judge) Cardozo,

that under our constitutional exclusionary...
There are those who say, as did Justice (then Judge) Cardozo, that under our constitutional exclusionary doctrine "[t]he criminal is to go free because the constable has blundered." People v. Defore, 242 N. Y., at 21, 150 N. E., at 587.
can you tell me what this exclusionary rule is applying to is it a procedure that was not followed, or if this has been overruled by another court thank you!
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own Personal Injury Law Question
Answered in 8 minutes by:
7/21/2013
Roger
Roger, Attorney
Category: Personal Injury Law
Satisfied Customers: 31,869
Experience: BV Rated by Martindale-Hubbell; SuperLawyer rating by Thompson-Reuters
Verified

Kirk Adams :

Hi - thanks for looking me up!

Kirk Adams :

Yes, the "exclusionary rule" stems from the 4th Amendment and it is intended to protect citizens from illegal searches and seizures. Also, the exclusionary rule also provides a remedy for a defendant when law enforcement illegally gathers evidence in violation of the Fifth Amendment in the Bill of Rights.

Kirk Adams :

If an investigation involves collecting evidence illegally, that evidence is inadmissible at trial.

Kirk Adams :

Most of these cases stem from an illegal search and seizure, which would be a break down in procedure.

Customer:

hi you doing esq. adams

Kirk Adams :

Just fine, Thanks. And you?

Customer:

glad to hear im ok

Customer:

would that only deal with the forbidden fruit rule or any procedural violation

Customer:

that an officer has blundered on

Kirk Adams :

Also, the exclusionary rule is still applicable law, and it stems from the federal constitution, but all state constitutions and subsequent state laws maintain this rule.

Kirk Adams :

The exclusionary rule generally just deals with "fruit of the poisonous tree" and not every procedural violation.

Kirk Adams :

The exclusionary rule is the term if there's an issue of illegally obtained evidence by the prosecution/law enforcement.

Customer:

ok so when that justice made that statement he was referring to the poisonos tree

Customer:

i also read were in a case law were trial by ambush are not accepted and

Kirk Adams :

I haven't read the case, but yes that should be the case.....The statement that the "constable has blundered" would likely mean just that. I'll take a look at the case and let you know for sure.

Customer:

that the

Kirk Adams :

Here's a quick summary of the case:

Kirk Adams :

FACTS: A police officer arrested defendant on a charge that he had stolen an overcoat. The crime, if committed, was petit larceny, a misdemeanor. Defendant when taken into custody was in the hall of his boarding house. After making the arrest, the officer, without a warrant, entered defendant's room and searched it. The search produced a bag containing a blackjack and a hat. Defendant was acquitted of larceny, but indicted as a second offender for the possession of the weapon. On appeal, the court held that the arrest was not lawful, so there was no lawful arrest to which the search could be an incident. The evidence against defendant was the outcome of a trespass, and the officer could have been held responsible civilly, and perhaps criminally, but his testimony was not thereby incompetent. Regarding the blackjack, as it was contraband, it could be offered in evidence without trenching upon the privilege in respect of self-incrimination whether seizure was made with warrant or without, and as the bag and hat were offered in evidence with it, all were admissible. The court held that the due process clause requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment was not violated.

OUTCOME: The judgment of conviction was affirmed.

Kirk Adams :

So yes, the case was about fruit of the poisonous tree and the inadmissibility of illegally obtained evidence.

Customer:

i also read were in a case law were trial by ambush are not accepted and that the prosecution disclose all material in there possession and control, would this be a violation if these things occurred and would it be an abuse of discretion if the judge allowed it

Kirk Adams : YES, that's true.
Kirk Adams : In the "old days" before the rules of procedure and evidence, every trial was a trial by ambush like you see in the old Perry Mason shows - - because the parties didn't share information.
Customer:

lol

Kirk Adams : Now, each party knows everything the other side has before tria.
Customer:

wouldn't this prove also that a person was not aware that thier was going to be a trial because the state is to produce the witness list for the trial

Kirk Adams : Possibly. A caveat to the disclosure rules is that the other party MUST ask for information and documentation during disovery in order for the other side to be entitled to the information.
Kirk Adams : So, if you asked for it, and it wasn't given, then the answer would likely be yes.
Customer:

i read this in Parlapiano v. District Court In & For Tenth Jud. Dist., 491 P. 2d 965 - Colo: Supreme Court 1971


We adopt the reasoning of Wimberly, and of American Bar Association Standards Relating to Discovery and Procedure Before Trial, § 2.1(a), which reads as follows:


"(a) Except as is otherwise provided as to matters not subject to disclosure (section 2.6) and protective orders (section 4.4), the prosecuting attorney shall disclose to defense counsel the following material and information within his possession or control:
Customer:

it doesnt mention he has to ask, however; a person could ask if they were aware that a trial is coming up this would give them the incentive to prepare for the trial would you agree?

Kirk Adams : Every state has different rules on the issue, so be aware of that.
Customer:

ok in ohio is it different

Customer:

it stated the rule is from the canons of the bar association

Kirk Adams : The safest thing is always to ask for the info in discovery.
Kirk Adams : Also, if the court entered a scheduling order requiring these disclosures, then you could rely on that as well.
Customer:

well im just reviewing a case were a guy i know was seven pretrial he was giving a yellow paper were the date for him to return on nothing more he griped about the speedy trial throughout procedures on the next date they start putting together a jury

Customer:

he objected

Customer:

the court never entered anything

Customer:

scheduling hearing but another date pretrial

Customer:

last one it was past 90 day stat period they dismissed his motion to dismiss on the speedy trial bases a went on with trial

Kirk Adams : Speedy trial motions are rarely ever granted because most courts are so back logged that any delay can be justified or explained.
Customer:

thats the problem it was explained officers appeared at last few hearing but because he wouldn't cop out they kept on postponing it

Customer:

and they have it written in the journal entry that he requested but he didnt he never did he kept contesting it

Customer:

i mean it was not explained

Customer:

and the officers he was going to get witnesses was not available for him

Customer:

because the never gave an accurate time

Kirk Adams : Appeals courts reverse decisions of trial courts every day.
Kirk Adams : That's something that could be appealed and argued to the next court, and the appeals court certainly could find that the trial court made a mistake.
Customer:

but from what i mentioned if its correct about him saying on the record he objects and asserting his right that can be found on the transcript and the journal entry reflecting something else would that be abuse of discretion in your opinion

Kirk Adams : If the judge never addressed his objection, that would be strange and should be a ground to appeal.
Customer:

esq. adams wanted to ask about when you file a subpoena for phone records, how would you find out what there phone carrier is to serve subpoena

Kirk Adams : Hi -
Kirk Adams : If you don't know who the carrier is, you would likely have to issue an interrogatory to the party and ask who the carrier is, and then use that information to issue your subpoena duces tecum to the phone carrier.
Customer:

got you and if they lie thats against them becuase they have to answer truthfully

Kirk Adams : That's right.
Kirk Adams : IF they intentionally lie to you and the court, that is serious business.....
Kirk Adams : It would be fraud on the court at the least
Customer:

can you request it in productions

Kirk Adams : You can request phone records, BUT if the party is not in possession of the documents, it may not result in the production of anything.....and you'd have to issue a subpoena.
Customer:

i have a law book by the name constitutional criminal pocedure, my question is about the miranda rights i read on arrest warrant the officer is to inform you about the warrant and read you your rights, if an officer had a warrant but never informed the person they were under arrest and took them in a room by themselves and questioned them incommunicado about a ticket do they remember it never saying theres a warrant or there under arrest, after the questions the person ask am i under arrest would that be a violation of the maranda rights regardless if no information was obtained?

Customer:

oh yeah then the officer told them yeah you under arrest

Kirk Adams : Miranda rights are not required until the person is under arrest. If the person was questioned without his rights being read, nothing asked or answered can be used against the person in court.
Customer:

miranda rights are not a 14 amendment right of the fourth and fifth regardless, it is only there for incriminating evidence, but upon arresting someone for a warrant wouldn't they have to inform then you have a warrant for your arrest for a ticket or failed court appearance etc in the beginning not after they have interrogated the person isn't that backwards

Kirk Adams : Sure, there would have to be some type of communication from the officer.
Customer:

would that be a violation of the maranda rights in a sense, because if you do not know your under arrest you might not think to say i need a lawyer or i have the right to remain silent

Kirk Adams : Practically speaking, I don't think it would matter.
Kirk Adams : Because IF you're not told your Miranda Rights, then no communication between the suspect and officer would be admissible.
Kirk Adams : MS Miranda warning is done to inform the suspect that he's under arrest and that anything said can be used against him. If the person isn't advised of these rights, then anything said should be inadmissible.
Customer:

but you would think that he asking you the questions to get you to admit before he informs you your under arrest he knows that your under arrest cause he has the warrant, but i see what your saying there nothing to defend against cause he cant use the statement unless he lies and say he read you your rights

Kirk Adams : Right
Roger
Roger, Attorney
Category: Personal Injury Law
Satisfied Customers: 31,869
Experience: BV Rated by Martindale-Hubbell; SuperLawyer rating by Thompson-Reuters
Verified
Roger and 87 other Personal Injury Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Ask Roger Your Own Question
Roger
Roger
Roger, Attorney
Category: Personal Injury Law
Satisfied Customers: 31,869
31,869 Satisfied Customers
Experience: BV Rated by Martindale-Hubbell; SuperLawyer rating by Thompson-Reuters

Roger is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help.

Mary C.Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Infolawyer

Infolawyer

Attorney

1,148 satisfied customers

Licensed attorney helping individuals and businesses.

Ely

Ely

Counselor at Law

719 satisfied customers

Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.

LawTalk

LawTalk

Attorney

485 satisfied customers

I have 30 years of legal and litigation experience.

Dimitry K., Esq.

Dimitry K., Esq.

Attorney

449 satisfied customers

I provide basic personal injury advice to my clients in my own practice.

Tina

Tina

Attorney

390 satisfied customers

Personal Injury & Wrongful Death experience includes judgment for $10M & $3M settlement

Brandon, Esq.

Brandon, Esq.

Attorney

367 satisfied customers

Has received a certificate of recognition from the California State Senate for his outstanding legal service.

P. Simmons

P. Simmons

Attorney

265 satisfied customers

16 yrs. of legal experience.

< Previous | Next >

Related Personal Injury Law Questions
I am a 64 year-old disabled physician who said, in an email
I am a 64 year-old disabled physician who said, in an email to the Dallas Fair Housing Office that if I lost everything I owned I could be suicidal. They didn't notice the word "if" and apparently cal… read more
Phillips Esq.
Phillips Esq.
Attorney
Juris Doctor
18,316 satisfied customers
VA TORT LAWYERS DENIED SF95 on 20 December 2017. They said
VA TORT LAWYERS DENIED SF95 on 20 December 2017. They said they would mail a letter and to date no letter has been sent. Can I file without the letter? … read more
P. Simmons
P. Simmons
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
265 satisfied customers
I want to know if I have a case before I put any money into
I want to know if I have a case before I put any money into this. I'm 62 years old and receive Social Security. They have a Big house swimming pool RV and all the best. I want them to pay!!! I've been… read more
LawGuy
LawGuy
Juris Doctor
123 satisfied customers
Questions about bringing lawsuit for Nuisance highway
Questions about bringing lawsuit for Nuisance highway design:"A public nuisance is a condition that is a danger to the public. White v. Town of Culpeper, 172 Va. 630, 636, 1 S.E.2d 269, 272 (1939). Th… read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
My Calif. medical malpractice negligence complaint requires
My Calif. medical malpractice negligence complaint requires which parts? What is repeated if any, and what is to be included in the First Amendment? How is a complaint different from an Amendment?… read more
Infolawyer
Infolawyer
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
1,148 satisfied customers
I broke my arm 10 months ago, Hospital had to break my elbow
I broke my arm 10 months ago, Hospital had to break my elbow to lodge rods and pins in my arm, First operation went ok couldn't move my arm 3 months later CT Scan showed Pins too big, 2nd operations t… read more
Infolawyer
Infolawyer
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
1,148 satisfied customers
A CVS pharmacist administered my flu shot approximately ten
A CVS pharmacist administered my flu shot approximately ten weeks ago. I recently mentioned to him that I have constant pulsating pain where the flu shot was given (upper right arm/near shoulder). I i… read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
I own a transportation company. One of my drivers was
I own a transportation company. One of my drivers was involved in an at fault accident on the 6th. He was taken to the hospital where he spent 2 days. The vehicle was towed and spent 4 days in storage… read more
Irwin Law
Irwin Law
Juris Doctor JD
7,088 satisfied customers
I was given a bad C-section when my last daughter was born
I was given a bad C-section when my last daughter was born the doctor left pieces of placenta in my body I went to him to tell him I wasn't feeling well he said I was just depressed after that I had t… read more
P. Simmons
P. Simmons
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
265 satisfied customers
My current landlord is very dependant on the rent I pay. I
hello. my current landlord is very dependant on the rent I pay. I paid every month on time except one month I paid $1000 a week early and $550 5 days past the due date(but within the same month). he t… read more
lucy7368
lucy7368
Juris Doctor
763 satisfied customers
Is there a way to get 1/2 hour or an hour of your time on
Is there a way to get 1/2 hour or an hour of your time on the phone? I'm specifically seeking Andrew answering this.… read more
Andrew
Andrew
Attorney
Juris Doctorate
197 satisfied customers
If we can show an intersection is an unsafe design, perhaps
If we can show an intersection is an unsafe design, perhaps the worst in the entire state, due to having unrelated traffic signals less than 200 feet apart after a long stretch of road without signals… read more
Ely
Ely
Counselor at Law
Juris Doctor
719 satisfied customers
ONLY - Trying to get on phone call, I've had other lawyers
ANDREW ONLY - Trying to get on phone call, I've had other lawyers call when he didn't answer fast enough - Trying to specifically get him, please don't call if not him.… read more
Andrew
Andrew
Attorney
Juris Doctorate
197 satisfied customers
Is a landlord responsible for damages of a hand burn if a
Is a landlord responsible for damages of a hand burn if a shock and flame shot out of an old socket in a bathroom?… read more
LegalKnowledge
LegalKnowledge
Juris Doctor
28,100 satisfied customers
About 6 months ago, our puppy got out of the yard and jumped
Hello, about 6 months ago, our puppy got out of the yard and jumped up on a lady in the street. When my husband went out to see what happened she said she was fine and everything seemed ok. However a … read more
WiseOwl58
WiseOwl58
JD Honors Graduate
3,695 satisfied customers
This is continued from previous question. Other than the
Ok, this is continued from previous question. Other than the fact of being able to appeal the decision, would there be any other advantage or disadvantage to filing suit in County court instead of sma… read more
Dwayne B.
Dwayne B.
Juris Doctor
28,688 satisfied customers
I had a breast lift/ breast augmentation on December 27th by
I had a breast lift/ breast augmentation on December 27th by a board certified surgeon. This surgery was not medically necessary, just a personal choice after breastfeeding for two years.I live in NJ … read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
30,828 satisfied customers
We have an unusual question. My husband was in a car
We have an unusual question. My husband Mark was in a car accident where a 16 year old ran a light and hit my husband and totaled his car. He has been seeing an Orthopedic doctor and having physical t… read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
30,828 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x