Hello, I have a interesting question, my brother went AWOL
from the Army
. He has a real interesting story about this soldier
across from him, while he lived in the barracks doing drugs. He did everything in his power through the chain of command and nothing was being done about this soldier. He got fed up and left, he initially went back and told his local area Congressman about this somewhat issue in his chain of command. He wrote a letter and one of the biggest issues is that their was no one policing up these soldier and they were getting away with things. Well now hes is out, but their was a murder off post from two soldiers a Gamez and Blackette who were on bath salts or salt baths and they killed this teenager.
Now while the national news was covering the issue, their were four soldiers who were on drugs, he left because of drugs. That the chain of command, was giving them discharge
upgrades. My brothers congressman representative told him that he was going to get his honorable when he got out. Now he is out its been six years and still fighting the Army about their excuses. Both our past presidents are very inclined about any issues related to the military. Now he is waiting for the Army Discharge
review board, they're asking him if he was on drugs. He actually has information that proves he dont do drugs. It just seems like their giving him the round about the only thing he has in the National News to be able to hear his story and that is about it. My main question is how does an outside veteran... hold on hes saying something... how does a outside Veteran able to get a hold of Commanded from divisions to see his side of the story when AWOL has no defense what so ever. The soldier across the hallway was distributing drugs even and the MPs would arrest him. They just told him to get sworn statements.