How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Allen M., Esq. Your Own Question
Allen M., Esq.
Allen M., Esq., Lawyer
Category: Military Law
Satisfied Customers: 19221
Experience:  Lawyer and current JAG officer.
Type Your Military Law Question Here...
Allen M., Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I am an Army (National Guard) Medical Officer and I recently

This answer was rated:

I am an Army (National Guard) Medical Officer and I recently became engaged to an Active Duty Navy Enlisted? I contacted an Army JAG, and because our relationship is based entirely outside the military, he said I was ok but I don't know if the actual marriage would change the situation. He went on to say generally the Army would only take action against the officer, but he was unsure of the Navy's policy.

First, am I able to marry my fiance now, or do I have to wait until they're no longer in the Navy (plans to get out in 3 years.)

Second, if this is not allowed, under what circumstances would this actually be a pursued issue as we are not even remotely connected in a military setting.

Third, what would your recommendation be if you were advising us to minimize potential problems? We are not going to end our relationship under any circumstances.

Thank you for your question today, I look forward to assisting you. I have nearly 20 years of legal experience in various disciplines, including JAG.


1. If the relationship outside of marriage is fine, then marriage is actually better. All of the fraternization laws exempt those that are married. It's actually the non-married period of the relationship that raises the legal issue. Fraternization is an "officer only" offense.


2. Again, it is the relationship outside of marriage that would be the issue, not marriage itself. The only thing that marriage might do is bring the pre-marriage relationship to the attention of command and if they had a problem with the pre-marriage relationship, they could choose to address that relationship even once you are married.


3. Obviously, the absolutely most safe thing to do is not be in the relationship, but as that is not a real option here, get married.

Customer: replied 4 years ago.
I only know that the army side of the relationship is ok according to AR 600-20 paragraph C2D and a little applicable in C2C. What about the Navy? Under what circumstances would the relationship be questioned? Is there any instance where the enlisted would be held accountable?

The Navy uses the exact same UCMJ as the rest of the military and fraternization is an officer only violation.


An unprofessional relationship is the only possible charge against an enlisted as, as you are not in the same branch, same unit, same command, etc., it isn't going to be invoked in that instance. It doesn't fit the more broad definition.

Customer: replied 4 years ago.
So botXXXXX XXXXXne is only I, the officer could be in question, and the Army's exception for reservists exempts me based on its civilian only capacity and marriage doesn't change that exception. The Navy wouldn't have grounds here to pursue the active enlisted as I've described it.
Customer: replied 4 years ago.
Relist: Other.
Awaiting response

I'm sorry. I was taking my kids to the day camp.


And yes, you've essentially restated my position exactly.

Allen M., Esq. and other Military Law Specialists are ready to help you