How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask psychlady Your Own Question
psychlady, Therapist
Category: Mental Health
Satisfied Customers: 6893
Experience:  Psychotherapist specializing in the treatment of a variety of mental health issues.
Type Your Mental Health Question Here...
psychlady is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

If someone is arrested for underage DWI (April 2002, age 20)

Resolved Question:

If someone is arrested for underage DWI (April 2002, age 20) and then 18 months later is arrested for DWI (October 2003, age 21) would this alone be sufficient to meet the criteria for Alcohol Abuse. In addition, if that person has demonstrated the ability to control his drinking for 7 years following the DWI (2003) would they currently meet the criteria for alcohol abuse. Lastly, if a person has demonstrated an ability to control his drinking for seven years (age 21 - 29) would forcing abstinence on that person be beneficial?
Submitted: 6 years ago.
Category: Mental Health
Expert:  psychlady replied 6 years ago.

I can only speak to this from the perspective of a drug and alcohol counselor that diagnoses every day. If someone has 2 DUI's in a relatively short period of time then they would meet criteria for alcohol abuse. The reason is that abuse is considered binging or outside that of social drinking. To have DUI's it suggests that you are drinking more than a social drinker. This is not the same as alcohol dependence which is an alcoholic who has physical symptoms. If that drinking has been controlled then there are 2 opinions depending on who you ask. One would say that DUI's at any point would indicate that someone has a history of binging and either has stopped or hasn't been caught. When someone has a history of some behavior it is assumed that that behavior can come back at any time. Forcing abstinence is not possible and there is no such thing. All the courts and other repercussions can be in place and it won't matter to some people. If abstinence can be coerced than the person would still be abstinence. Preventing drinking by any method could show an improvement but this is irrelevant anyway

If this is helpful press accept

psychlady and other Mental Health Specialists are ready to help you