Ask a Lawyer and Get Answers to Your Legal Questions
Hi,I'm Zoey and I'll be assisting you. I'm reviewing your question now.
Why were the first two cases dismissed?
If they were dismissed without prejudice, that means that the state has permission to refile the case if they wish to. So the evidence they already have could be used as the basis for the search warrant.
When you fight your case, however, your lawyer will be able to get a hearing to challenge the legality of the search. And if it turns out that your Constitutional rights were violated, then anything recovered in that search cannot be used as evidence in your trial. Also, however, if the drugs you had in your house were there because you have a lawful prescription for them, possession of those drugs are legal.
Apparently there was a problem with the payment for the phone call. Customer service will probably contact you and sort that out. I cannot call you until the site okays it.
As to dismissals, it's the other way around. If the case is dismissed with prejudice, they are not allowed to refile charges. If the case is dismissed without prejudice, that means they can refile charges.
You should not be taking your evidence to the police. They are not your friends after they charge you. They can't dismiss your case. It doesn't belong to them. It has gone to the prosecutor.
You want to save your proof and show it to your lawyer. He will know what to do with that and when it will be most effective.
I don't know why they would dismiss and couldn't possibly be able to tell you unless I could see the court papers and confer with the prosecuting attorney, which of course I can't. There are bunches of reasons that a prosecutor can dismiss a case -- a missing witness, a problem with the lab test or the evidence, just to name two. It doesn't mean they don't think you committed the crime. It means that for one reason or another they don't think they can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
This one they think they can prove, I guess. If you sell your legitimately prescribed drugs, then that would still be illegal. Though you say none were missing, they are entitled to try to prove otherwise if they think they can.
Just checking in to see if you need more help or any clarification of my answer. If so, please reply here on this question thread.