How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Attorney2 Your Own Question
Attorney2, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 6729
Experience:  29 Years In General Practice,
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Attorney2 is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I serve as a member of Connecticut’s Historic Preservation

Customer Question

I serve as a member of Connecticut’s Historic Preservation Council (HPC). We are charged with “preventing the unreasonable destruction of properties listed on, or under consideration for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places.” Under Connecticut’s Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) we may refer the case of a threatened property to the Attorney General and ask for an injunction.
The University of Connecticut proposes to demolish 9 properties on their Storrs campus that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places. This did not come to our Council because a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was signed “behind closed doors” between the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and UConn allowing the destruction of the buildings with three weak mitigation requirements. We learned of the demolition plans by happenstance when the state historian, who also serves on our Council, brought it to our attention in June.
Since then I have launched a grassroots campaign to urge SHPO to follow protocol in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) to potentially save the buildings. The Connecticut Trust is now also involved. However, because the approval was so political in nature SHPO is not willing to open the case – even with an outpouring of popular support (650 signatories to a petition, letters and e-mails to SHPO, and over 1,200 “friends” of our facebook page – “Save UConn’s Faculty Row”
Obviously SHPO, UConn, the Chairman of the HPC, and likely the Governor’s Office dislike this publicity. They call the page “negative” and “filled with misinformation.” Most of it is comprised of newspaper articles, television footage and letters to the editor from various concerned citizens (not me). I have written a few posts that contain my opinion of the situation and give information and documentation. I do not identify myself on the site – I post as “Save Faculty Row.”
When the webpage was brought up at our last HPC meeting I did take responsibility for establishing it and invited anyone who had corrections to the information presented to post them.
I would like to pay an attorney to read the information I have posted on the Save UConn’s Faculty Row Facebook Page and give an opinion:
1) Am I within my rights to create and maintain this page (since I serve on the HPC)
2) Is anything I have written considered libelous
I realize that this project is beyond the scope of a simple question and will cost more accordingly. I would like to have a legal opinion in hand at our next HPC meeting when the Facebook page is once again on the agenda.
Thank you –
Margaret Faber***@******.***
JA: Since estate law varies from place to place, can you tell me what state this is in?
Customer: Connecticut - but this isn't estate law.
JA: Has anything been filed or reported?
Customer: No
JA: Anything else you want the lawyer to know before I connect you?
Customer: No thanks
Submitted: 9 months ago.
Category: Legal
Customer: replied 9 months ago.
Also, in my latest post "A double standard?" I attach documents that we were given as part of our meeting packet. Are they public record and can they be shared on Facebook?
Expert:  Attorney2 replied 9 months ago.
Welcome to JA and thank you for your question. I would be happy to review the Facebook posts. As far as providing a legal opinion that you can hand out at the meeting the terms of service of the site prohibit the Attorneys from creating an Attorney/Client relationship with customers on the site. I can tell you if I see any concerns. I can also provide a link for local attorneys that provide FREE consultations in your area. You are absolutely entitied to voice your opinion. Defamation involves false statements that cause injury to the person or persons being defamed.
Expert:  Attorney2 replied 9 months ago.

Let me know if you would like to continue with a review. Historic preservation is extraordinarily important and I appreciate and respect your passion.

Related Legal Questions