How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask CalAttorney2 Your Own Question
CalAttorney2, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 10244
Experience:  Civil litigation attorney for individuals and businesses.
Type Your Legal Question Here...
CalAttorney2 is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

What does a Pro per plaintiff have to do next? If a licensed

Customer Question

What does a Pro per plaintiff have to do next? If a licensed attorney for a Defendant filed anti-SLAPP motion after the default of the defendant has been registered.
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Legal
Expert:  CalAttorney2 replied 1 year ago.

You need to file an opposition to the anti-SLAPP motion. (prepare to move forward on the merits).

A default rarely is going to be upheld if the defendant is appearing within a short time after the entry of default (in most cases a court will be setting aside a default under the very broad umbrella of "excusable neglect" for up to 6 months after the entry of a default judgment (not just the entry of default).

So while you can argue that the entry of default should be dealt with first (the defendant should file a motion to set aside the default prior to filing their responsive pleading (the anti-SLAPP motion), it probably isn't worth your time (they would probably get the default set aside anyway).

However, it can also be a worthwhile strategy for another reason - if for some reason they win the anti-SLAPP, they get their attorney's fees, if you keep the fees low by simply addressing the anti-SLAPP rather than trying to make a big deal over the entry of default (which as I noted is not likely to stick), you will be reducing your risk of loss if you end up having to pay their attorney bill for the motion.

(Of course this is just a strategy consideration, you are free to file a motion with the court arguing that the anti-SLAPP should not be considered, the default was entered, and the court should not recognize the party).