Legal

Ask a Lawyer and Get Answers to Your Legal Questions

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

Legal
This answer was rated:

I received a careless driving citation from a Cannon Beach

policemaN in downtown Cannon Beach...
I received a careless driving citation from a Cannon Beach policemaN in downtown Cannon Beach but the citiation was about a period three hours earlier 20 miles or so away on highway 26 when I was headed to the coast earlier that day.

The officer told me that two different people called the police to complain about my wreckless driving. I asked him "what did I do wrong" but he declined to describe what I specifically did and would not answer any more questions. I told him I am not a careless driver and I had no situation with other cars other than passing some cars that were going 10 miles or so below the speed limit or were weaving in/out in the lane.

The officer claimed he spoke to the two complainers and they did not know each number so he thought I was guilty for having two conplainers corroborate the information, two complainers he had never met and could smell for liquer breath or physical/ mental conditions, or roadworthioness of theior cars fro the heavy rainfall.

I was not able to ask if he had checked the phone numbers they called from to confirm they were not two people making two calls in the same car.

I was not able to ask any questions about the two callers about the cars thy were driving because he wasn't there and never saw their carts or trucks.

The officer didn't know it their vehicles were road legal, had working wipers or working defrosters for the windshiels./

I was not able to ask the officer if he asked about the tread condition of the two cars tires and the whether their vehicles where sliding and having traction losses on the we highway with the strong downpour.

It is most probable that the officer got verbal complaints from two people who were already fearfull about driving in the heavy downpour. They became angry at me when I legally passed them and unintentionally splashed them in the heavy downpour. I did pass a few people on a stretch of highway 26 that had dashed striping that allowed passing legally.

I believe that I was allowed to pass these slower cars as I had full control of my heavy Mercedes ML430 that had new Michelion Pilot top-of-the-line tires with very good wet traction, good windshield wipers with new blades and a robust window defroster.

I never lost traction, I never lost control of the car and I never challenged any other drivers whom ever they were. Over the total 70 mile trip I passed four cars who were either going much slower than the speed limit or were having difficulty staying in their lanes which always worries me for safety reasons.

THE OFFICER WHO WROTE THE CITATION THREE HOURS AFTER I DROVE TO THE BEACH DID NOT SEE ANYTHING AT ALL AS HE WASN'T THERE IN EITHER TIME OR SPACE!

I DON'T KNOW IF HE HAS ANY IDEA OF THE ACTUAL OFFENSE CAUSED BY MY CLAIMED CARELESS DRIVING. HE APPEARED TO BE UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO DESCRIBE WHAT I LITERALLY DID WRONG, LIKE NOT STAYING IN MY LANES, PASSING WHERE NOT ALLOWED WITH DASHED STRIPPING. HE SEEMED TO NOT KNOW ANY DETAILS.

I GUESS HE ACCEPTED THE HEARSAY STATEMENTS OF THE TWO COMPLAINERS WITHOUT KNOWING IF THEY WERE ACTUALLY INDEPENDENT AS HE DID NOT MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INDEPENDEBTLY CONFIRM THEIR CLAIM OF NOT KNOWING EACH OTHER (LIKE TRACING THE SOURCE TELEPHONE NUMBERS TO INSURE THEY WERE INDEED DIFFERENT).

HE CERTAINLY DID NOT TELL ME THAT HE EXPLORED IF EITHER OR BOTH DRIVERS WERE ALREADY FEARFULL ABOUT THEIR DRING CONDITIONDS BEFORE I PASSED THEM.

tHE ONLY THING i AM REASONABLE SURE OF IS...

IF SOMEONE WAS FEARFULL OF DRIVING IN THE HEAVY RAIN AND POSSIBLY HAD DIFFICULTY WITH WIPERS, DEFROSTERS OR TRACTION OF WORN TIRES, THEY WOULD GET MORE FEARFUL BY THE SPLASH OF MY PASSING THEM, REGARDLESS OF THE FACT THAT MY PASSING THEM WAS LEGAL AND THAT I WAS IN FULL CONTROL OF MY CAR.

I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THIS MOST LIKELY SITUATION JUSTIFIES ISSUING ME A CITIATION FOR CARLESS DRIVING. THIS OFFICER HAD FEW IF ANY ACTUAL FACTS AND HAD NEVER SEEN THE TWO COMPLAINERS NOR KNEW IF THEIR VEHIVLES WERE LEGAL TO BE DRIVEN IN A HEAVY DOWNPOUR.

CAN YOUR FIRM THINK ABOUT WHAT I SHOULD/COULD DO TO KEEP THIS CITATION OFF OF MY DRIVING RECORD.

THE CITATION MUST BE RESPONDED TO BY OCTOBER 10TH SO i MUST QUICKLY DECIDE ON ASKING FOR A TRIAL OR NOT.

I HOPE i HAVE BEEN CLEAR ENOUGH TO GET YOUR THINKING GOING.

I AM A RETIRED COMPUTER EXECUTIVE WITH A MASTER'S DEGREE. MY LAST POSITION BEFORE RETIRING WAS AS CEO AND PRESIDENT OF A PUBLIC COUNTRY BASED IN PORTLAND.

MY WIFE AND I OWN HOUSES IN CANNON BEACH AND IN PORTLAND WE BOTH DRIVE BACK AND FORTH QUITE FREQUENTLY. SHE STAYS IN CANNON BEACH AND I STAY IN PORTLAND.... l.o.l.

PLEASE RECOMMEND WHAT TO DO.

SINCERELY,

MICHAEL SIMON
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Answered in 46 minutes by:
10/4/2013
socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 39,353
Experience: Retired (mostly)
Verified
Hello,

I assume from your allegations that the charge is ORS 811.135 (careless driving).

In order to convict you, the witnesses must appear and testify. The police officer's testimony is entirely inadmissible, because he has no personal knowledge of the alleged offense. You can object to the officer testifying to anything other than the fact that he stopped you and cited you, and that he interviewed the witnesses -- but you can object to the officer testifying to anything that the witnesses said, because that is inadmissible hearsay without the witnesses testifying in court.

The chance that either of the witnesses will appear for trial is small. In fact, there is no procedure for notifying those witnesses to appear in court, because the district attorney is not notified of a traffic offense.

Consequently, if you ask for a trial, there is a high probability that there will be no witness against you at the trial, and even if the police officer appears, you can object to all of his testimony about your alleged violation, and then ask the court to find you not guilty, because there will be absolutely no evidence in the record of your having committed any offense.

The only way that you are likely to lose this case is if both of the drivers who complained about your driving appear at trial to testify. So, the odds are with you -- especially given that those witnesses are not likely to want to waste their time in court.

Please let me know if my answer is helpful and if I can provide further assistance.

And, thanks for using justanswer.com!
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago

If I accept your answer as being a correct interpretation of the law and act on that, am I protected that you did not make a mistake and send me to the hearing to find out that I did not correctly understyand the law.... abd am found guilty.


 


I am under the impression that if I hire a lawyer to give me advice, his/her practice insurance guarantees me that I am protected if I go to court and use his advice to protect myself.


 


So.... do I get some sort of protection if I accept your advice and


compensate you for it?


 


Thanks for your response,


 


Michael Simon

Have you read the disclaimers provided to you by the website before you read the answer?
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago

You may thin this is a silly what if....


 


What if I rely on your answer and go to a court hearing on the citation and the Judge tells me....


 


the officer is correct in assuming my guilt because he has electronic recordings of his telephone interviews and can represent what he learned from those two drivers to substantiate the citation based upon two unrelated


people accusing you of Careless Driving.


 


What do you say if the judge then throws the proverbial book at me?.

I don't think you're silly at all.

The Oregon Evidence Code is in force for any trial of a traffic violation. If you visit this website for the City of Tigard, you can see that it confirms substantially what I have explained. Similarly, the Official Justice Court Rules Gen. Ord. 2009-1(3) in Tilamook County provides that the Oregon Evidence Code is adopted in full.

ORS 40.315 Rule 602 provides, "Subject to the provisions of ORS 40.415, a witness may not testify to a matter unless evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter. Evidence to prove personal knowledge may, but need not, consist of the testimony of the witness."

In Brown v. JC Penney Co., 688 P. 2d 811 (1984), the Oregon Supreme Court held that witness statements reproduced in a police report is inadmissible hearsay, "if the purpose was to prove the truth of the statements of the various complainants of criminal activity."

 

A voice recording is a "writing," no different than any other. The recording is admissible to prove that a recording was made by the police officer. But, it's not admissible to prove the truth of the statements made by the persons whose voices are heard on the recording. Those voices could be manufactured by the police officer to corroborate his testimony. It's inadmissible hearsay.

I could go on, if you like -- but, if you are looking for an ironclad statement of law that provides that you cannot lose your case at trial, then I cannot possibly accommodate that request -- because, if nothing else, traffic court judges are highly disposed to rule against driver defendants, and they bend over backwards to find ways to avoid having to play be the regular rules of evidence.

So, I can't say you will win. If you really want to win, then hire a lawyer, because my experience is that, generally speaking, laypersons always lose in court (except small claims, where the courts are expected to give laypersons an edge).

It's really all up to you. I know that the officer cannot testify to what the witnesses said -- it's inadmissible hearsay. And, the officer cannot testify to your committing the crime, because the officer never saw you commit the crime. So, if the witnesses don't show up, then there will be no one to testify to any of the evidence of the crime, which means you must be found not guilty.

That's the academic argument. In a real traffic court, the judge could ignore the rules of evidence and find you guilty -- no doubt about it. But, that's something beyond my control. In the end, it's entirely up to the judge to uphold the incorruptibility of the legal system.

Hope this helps.

socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 39,353
Experience: Retired (mostly)
Verified
socrateaser and 87 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Ask socrateaser Your Own Question
socrateaser
socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 39,353
39,353 Satisfied Customers
Experience: Retired (mostly)

socrateaser is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

Not only did he answer my Michigan divorce question but was also able to help me out with it, too. I have since won my legal case on this matter and thank you so much for it.

LeeMichigan

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Tina

Tina

Lawyer

8,775 satisfied customers

JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.

Ely

Ely

Counselor at Law

24,218 satisfied customers

Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.

INFOLAWYER

INFOLAWYER

Attorney

20,218 satisfied customers

Licensed attorney helping individuals and businesses

JPEsq

JPEsq

Attorney

2,132 satisfied customers

Experience as general attorney, in house counsel, SSDI, Family Law attorney, and law professor

Law Educator, Esq.

Law Educator, Esq.

Attorney

41,455 satisfied customers

JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law

Ellen

Ellen

Lawyer, Consultant

8,238 satisfied customers

25 years of experience helping people like you.

Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.

Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.

Attorney

287 satisfied customers

7+ years of experience handling various legal matters.

< Previous | Next >

Related Legal Questions
It's about my probability in winning a small claims case.
hi it's about my probability in winning a small claims case. could you help me with that … read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
5,903 satisfied customers
I am the defendant in a small claim in Wisconsin, the
I am the defendant in a small claim in Wisconsin, the Defendant and her lawyer did not appear on the scheduled court date - the court dismissed the case. They want to reopen the case, and have a heari… read more
Roy Hadavi
Roy Hadavi
Attorney
Juris Doctorate
886 satisfied customers
I had a small claims case. A witness was not sworn in by the
I had a small claims case. A witness was not sworn in by the judge before answering questions and told lies. Can I request a new hearing because she didn't take the oath first … read more
Bill Attorney
Bill Attorney
law
1,415 satisfied customers
If I lose in small claims court, will I be responsible for
If I lose in small claims court, will I be responsible for plaintiff's court fees? … read more
Barrister
Barrister
Attorney/Landlord/Realtor
Doctoral Degree
34,612 satisfied customers
Small claims for business. California Orange County. No. Im
1. Is it defense if there is not a signed agreement in place… read more
Barrister
Barrister
Attorney/Landlord/Realtor
Doctoral Degree
34,612 satisfied customers
I went to small claims court and was able to reach a
I went to small claims court and was able to reach a settlement out of court for 10K from my previous employers. Can they tax it? … read more
Roy Hadavi
Roy Hadavi
Attorney
Juris Doctorate
886 satisfied customers
I am the victim of mistaken identity in a small claims
I am the victim of mistaken identity in a small claims judgement against my son Darral Lee Spurgeon Jr., I am Darral Lee Spurgeon Sr.. Summit Judgement Recovery LLC (Ronald Richards) has filed a Levyi… read more
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
41,455 satisfied customers
Small claims. Small cliam on flooring compamy 2,000. No not
small claims would b good to waste your time, do u have any thoughswhat what I can… read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
5,903 satisfied customers
Can a person take someone to small claims for under the
Can a person take someone to small claims for under the table cash for hrs they think they have coming ? … read more
Roy Hadavi
Roy Hadavi
Attorney
Juris Doctorate
886 satisfied customers
Can a person file a small claims complaint against an
Can a person file a small claims complaint against an insurance company whose home base is out of state and demand their presence in Texas. … read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
5,903 satisfied customers
My driving license is suspended due to the insurance
My driving license is suspended due to the insurance problem. … read more
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
41,455 satisfied customers
What is the statues of limitations at small claims court for
What is the statues of limitations at small claims court for an auto claim … read more
Dwayne B.
Dwayne B.
Juris Doctor
28,498 satisfied customers
I represented myself in small claims. (This happened
I represented myself in small claims. (This happened yesterday) The Attorney called me today and said I lost. I owe them 1600.00.The Attorney called me three times at work and was harassing me to pay.… read more
LegalGems
LegalGems
Juris Doctorate
10,163 satisfied customers
Is is possible for a small claims judge to also issue a
Is is possible for a small claims judge to also issue a cease and desist order? or are they separate jurisdiction? San Bernadino county, California … read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
5,903 satisfied customers
I sent in my proof of insurance but I was driving my
Hi I sent in my proof of insurance but I was driving my daughters car and they said they can't acpet it as proof cause it was for my car … read more
KJL LAW
KJL LAW
Juris Doctorate
1,618 satisfied customers
I will be suing an individual in Small Claims Court in NYC
I will be suing an individual in Small Claims Court in NYC for breach of contract. My claim is for about $4100 plus about $500 interest for the non-payment, calculated at 9%, which I believe is the ra… read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
5,903 satisfied customers
Small Claims, A Situation With A Person Dealing With The
Small Claims, A Situation With A Person Dealing With The Western Union, And A Investment Firm.. … read more
INFOLAWYER
INFOLAWYER
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
20,218 satisfied customers
Since it's illegal to drive in Ohio without car insurance,
Since it's illegal to drive in Ohio without car insurance, what happens if no insurance company will take you? Can the state give you insurance? If so how much would it be?… read more
Zoey, JD
Zoey, JD
Doctoral Degree
175 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x