Ask a Lawyer and Get Answers to Your Legal Questions
Hello and thank you for contacting Just Answer. I am an expert here and I look forward to assisting you today. If at any point any of my answers aren’t clear please don’t hesitate to ask for clarification.
That type of clause is becoming more common.
It is used to prevent a law firm from being disqualified in cases due to a potential conflict of interest because they represented someone on an entirely different matter in the past.
It usually isn't an issue because they would still be disqualified if there is a real conflict of interest, regardless of that clause.
I got it
so it is just in case there is a potential conflict
It's used more for business and family lawyers than most others.
And it is actually more for where there isn't really a conflict, just prior representation.
The Code of Ethics would still prevent representation if there were a real conflict of interest.
ok. if there is a conflict, the federal law still prohibits adverse representation?
thank you for your prompting answer
Best wishes to you!