How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Law Educator, Esq. Your Own Question
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 118237
Experience:  JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Law Educator, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Im pro se. Opposing atty interrupted me on the phone when

This answer was rated:

I'm pro se. Opposing atty interrupted me on the phone when I was amending my discovery request for documents and said that since the request was within 30 days of end of discovery, the request would be untimely and he wouldn't have to comply. Since then, he has broken this rule and the judge sided with him. Do I have any recourse for his bad advice to me?
Customer: replied 4 years ago.
Relist: No answer yet.
Was not duplicate question.
Thank you for your question. I look forward to working with you to provide you the information you are seeking.

Unfortunately, opposing counsel does not represent you, so his "bad advice" to you would not be actionable against him as he has no legal duty to you at all. Opposing counsel's legal duty is to his client and he is to do what he can to zealously represent his client. By the letter of the code of procedure, a court does not have to allow discovery after the discovery period closes and what was left off of that is that if you wanted discovery beyond the close of the discovery period you could make a motion to the court for leave to do so if opposing counsel did not agree to provide the information.

This is something I am afraid that happens to many pro se litigants who do not know the rules of court or rules of procedure or rules of evidence, is that they get out legally maneuvered by opposing counsel who use the lack of knowledge of rules against them. The courts hold that if a party chooses to represent themselves pro se, they are to be held to the same standards as a licensed attorney, so this hurts pro se litigants in court and I am afraid you cannot sue or take action against the opposing counsel for them providing you only half or partial information about the rules of procedure.

Thank you so much for using I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered. PLEASE use REPLY to EXPERT if you would like more information or if you feel something was not included in your answer.

Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO RECEIVE ANY CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.

Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.

Customer: replied 4 years ago.

Just to be sure we're on the same page...this was about 27 days before discovery ended, and his premise was that we have 30 days to respond to requests, so all requests have to be in 30 days before the end. And wouldn't that at least be unethical to give legal advice like that to a pro se?

Thank you for your response.

He was not telling you the complete accurate information, but again he did not represent you and he had no duty to you. He was also wrong about his information. When discovery is set to end, as in your case in 27 days, that means all REQUESTS must be in at that time, not that all answers have to be given in that time and he was taking advantage of your lack of knowledge of the rules, but legally he was not giving you advice, he could not give you advice, he was not representing you.

It could be potentially a violation of the rules of professional conduct for failure to be truthful with parties and tribunal, but it would not b grounds for you to sue him I am afraid because of the lack of duty to you.
Law Educator, Esq. and other Legal Specialists are ready to help you