How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Brandon M. Your Own Question
Brandon M.
Brandon M., Counselor at Law
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 12620
Experience:  Attorney experienced in numerous areas of law.
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Brandon M. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Hello, my boyfriend and I just broke up. We adopted a dog together.

This answer was rated:

Hello, my boyfriend and I just broke up. We adopted a dog together. The dog and I have a strong bond together and my ex is trying to take the dog from me. The dog has my name only on his microchip. Is that enough documentation for me to
Keep him ? He does not dedicate the time towards Takoda that I do ( he works doubles leaving the dog inside all day) and I am concerned for the well being of my dog.

Brandon M. :

Hello there.

Customer: Hello
Brandon M. :

Hello, thank you for your question.

Brandon M. :

Tell me a bit more about the situation. If I had asked your boyfriend who owned the dog prior to the break up, how would he have answered?

Customer: Your welcome. Can you please help let me know what steps I need to take to get my dog?
Customer: He would say it was both ours. But he doesn't dedicate the time that I do with Takoda. He is always with me when I'm not at work.
Brandon M. :

Who purchased the dog?

Brandon M. :

You said that it was "adopted" together... did you get it from an animal shelter?

Customer: I found Takoda and my ex paid for him. But we divided cost of care evenly
Customer: I thought he bought Takoda as a gift, but apparently he had other motives.
Brandon M. :

How long ago did you adopt the dog?

Customer: About a year and a half ago
Brandon M. :

Well, let me explain the law so you can see where I am headed with this line of questioning...

Customer: Ok
Brandon M. :

I should start by saying that because the nuances of every case are different, this information should not be construed as complete or advice without consulting in person with counsel. That said, the question of what happens to a pet after a break-up is a common one. Unfortunately, the answer is complex. Under the law, a pet is considered a piece of property and it is therefore treated like any other piece of property. However, unlike a dresser or television set, people emotionally attach themselves to their pets (and their pets emotionally attach themselves to their owner), so that tends to muddy the waters. So the first legal question with a pet is who owns this piece of "property".

Brandon M. :

So I'm asking these questions about who paid for the animal, etc. because I am looking for indications of who is treating the animal like it is their property, and maybe if either party treated it like it was a gift to the other.

Brandon M. :

Like other property, it is entirely possible that more than one person has a property right to it. In that case, the courts are typically inclined to award the property to whomever receives greater benefit from the property and just makes the recipient "buy out" the other for its value.

Customer: There's his microchip which has only my information on it (because I thought Takoda was a gift), but then there is documentation with my exes name too. But you can't split a dog in half, so it is my belief that he should go w the person he is most bonded with to give him the best quality of life.
Brandon M. :

The name on a pet's microchip is certainly relevant for determining ownership, but it isn't necessarily definitive. Interestingly, "the best interests" of the animal is not necessarily relevant, but the relationship of the pet to the owners can be relevant.

Customer: I'm just wondering if the conflict of paperwork can work to my advantage or if I am at a loss.
Brandon M. :

If one partner was responsible for feeding the animal, taking it for vet visits, training the animal, etc., the court is more inclined to award the animal to that person.

Brandon M. :

If one partner is at home all day with the animal, playing with it, taking it for walks, etc., that person will typically have a better argument for keeping the animal when the other is spending their day at work.

Customer: I walked him, went kayaking with him, am part of helping opening up a local dog park, train him, feed him, make sure he has his tick and flea guard on, buy him his toys, cut his nails, etc. the dog is always by me bc we have developed a close bond.
Brandon M. :

If we asked your boyfriend to describe his relationship and care for the animal, how might he respond?

Customer: He is using the dog as a way to manipulate me bc he knows how much I love Takoda.
Customer: He would say he took him to get his shots and the licence is in his name.
Brandon M. :

Those are good things, but it doesn't seem like much compared to the time and energy you say that you have invested in the animal.

Customer: It's a situation where on paper (other than my name on microchip) he looks like the owner, but i provide the daily care.
Customer: So I have the right to ownership of Takoda?
Customer: I'm just afraid he will try to have me arrested or harass me if I keep Takoda.
Brandon M. :

Well, law enforcement ordinarily has no interest whatsoever in getting involved in a couple's animal ownership dispute. If someone wants a judicial determination of the right to possess an animal, it's a matter that can and should be resolved through a civil lawsuit. A judge can then examine the facts and make a determination based on the totality of the evidence.

Customer: I really don't think he would pay to bring me to court
Brandon M. :

Most people wouldn't. Especially if they know that they could lose their case.

Customer: Okay, well I believe I have my answer.
Customer: Thank you
Brandon M. :

Certainly. When I only have one piece of one half of the story, I can't make a reliable prediction of the outcome of a case, but I do try to explain things in a way that helps people to understand the law for themselves.

Brandon M. :

Did you have any other question?

Customer: He is not agreeing to let me see the dog, I have until the end of the month to get all my things. Should I just go and take the dog when he's not home?
Brandon M. :

The dog is in his possession right now?

Customer: Yes he took him out of my car.
Customer: I was getting my things and he made me give him Takoda.
Brandon M. :

Well, as I mentioned, because the nuances of every case are different, this information should not be construed as complete or advice without consulting in person with counsel. That said, the question of how to go about repossessing an animal that was taken by someone else but belongs to you is really a question of personal strategy. It's usually an option to just "take it back", but that can be problematic because doing so sometimes require trespassing; furthermore, it usually doesn't resolve the problem because it can just lead to a tug-of-war where neither person respects the law or each other. One person takes the animal today, the other takes it back tomorrow, the first person takes it back the day after that, and so on. It's usually an option to just take the animal back, but that doesn't mean it's necessarily the best option.

The preferred legal option is to file an action in replevin. Replevin is basically asking the court to order someone to give something back that belongs to you in the first place. Naturally, the disadvantage is that this requires going to court and it is less than instant.

Brandon M. :

The reason replevin is the "preferred" option is that it settles the matter once and for all. If the other person takes the animal thereafter, then law enforcement can get involved and treat it as a theft.

Customer: Oh ok. Thank you. I will look into this.
Brandon M. :

Sure. The best option for proceeding really depends on the situation and the preference of the individual.

Brandon M. :

Most problems can't be solved in an hour, but my goal is always to help people understand the law. Has this information been helpful?

Customer: Yes.
Brandon M. and other Legal Specialists are ready to help you