How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Law Educator, Esq. Your Own Question
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 118750
Experience:  JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Law Educator, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

During a trial the Forensic Expert (A detective) witness for

This answer was rated:

During a trial the Forensic Expert (A detective) witness for the State testified to the concocted forensic evidence that he could not make a positive match because of the man made markings in People’s exhibit #1 (a gun) but he did not explain or give what method he used to come to that opinion.
Trial Attorney did not question him on this. Defendant did not have an expert witness of his own.
Heart of the case was that people’s Exhibit #1 (a gun) that was used in a single murder (self-defense) was also used in a double murder for which the defendant is incarcerated for.
22 ½ years after the trial can the defendant use this to demonstrate prejudice for the 1st time?
Thank you for your question. I look forward to working with you to provide you the information you are seeking.

Was this information ever raised on the appeal, since it was made known in the trial evidently?
Customer: replied 4 years ago.

No this has never been raised on any appeal. We are not questioning the Expert but during trial, he never discussed how he came to his opinion. And since the trial attorney never asked any questions regarding this and the Expert did not make any reference to how he reach his conclusion. If the defendant was prejudice by this it may give him an avenue that has never been looked into before.



Thank you for your response but I am afraid you missed my other part of that question. 22 years later I am afraid this is something that is too late to raise since it is not new information that has just been discovered. This testimony and the attorney's actions in not questioning this were known at the time the first appeals were filed and as such the defendant cannot get continuous chances at appeal years later. The only way to appeal something like this 22 years after the fact is if there is NEW recently discovered evidence that was not reasonably discoverable during the trial or first appeal. This is nothing new and as such should have been raised on his original appeals I am sorry to say. This is a case that if you file this on appeal now would be dismissed without even much of an answer from the appeals court I am afraid.

Thank you so much for using I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered. PLEASE use REPLY to EXPERT if you would like more information or if you feel something was not included in your answer.

Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO XXXXX CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.

Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.

Law Educator, Esq. and other Legal Specialists are ready to help you