How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask socrateaser Your Own Question
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 38910
Experience:  Retired (mostly)
Type Your Legal Question Here...
socrateaser is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

For Socrateaser I am the remaining trustee on a Charitable

This answer was rated:

For Socrateaser

I am the remaining trustee on a Charitable Remainder Unitrust which my parents entered into in 1994. A copy of the original trust can be downloaded from It was set up originally with the LCMS Foundation as trustee, but because of losses and simple poor performance, the Foundation allowed the trusteeship to be transferred to Dad, Mom (now deceased) and me. See The LCMS remains as the vested remainder beneficiary.
The organization that oversees this CRT, Renaissance LLC, has received a request from the LCMS Foundation for information on the account. The section of the statutes that were included, as well as the letter, can be downloaded from
Question: Do I or does Renaissance have any obligation to respond? In the statute section included paragraph 8 states it is only applicable to trusts that are dated after January 1, 2005, and the CRT is dated 1994. It states that the earlier law would remain applicable; can you access what the earlier law states? Is response by anyone required?

Prior to 2005, Missouri trust law was a mixture of statutes and case law, which was quite difficult to decipher consistently. In 2005, the state enacted its version of the Uniform Trust Code, which codified the requirement for an accounting.

Earlier case law provides that "Four elements are required to establish equitable jurisdiction for a trust accounting: (1) the need for discovery, (2) the complicated nature of the accounts, (3) the existence of a fiduciary or trust relationship, and (4) the inadequacy of legal remedies; of these, the existence of a fiduciary relationship is the most critical element to support the exercise of equitable jurisdiction." Tobias v. Korman, 141 S.W.3d 468 (2004).

The above is arguable, and would require a court to completely resolve -- though I suspect that you would lose the argument, because the beneficiary of the unitrust has an interest in an accounting of its distributions in the main trust.

The secondary issue, however, is whether or not the law, as modified, controls the earlier trust. There is nothing in the trust instrument itself to suggest that the law was frozen in 1994. The trust language merely provides that Missouri law shall control. This means that absent impairment of a vested interest under the constitutional "obligations of contracts" clause, there is no reason to think that you would not have a duty to account, based upon current Missouri law.

This is not a circumstance where the law cuts off a beneficiary's right to income or assets from the trust. It's a procedural change in law which reasonably requires that an accounting occur each year.

BotXXXXX XXXXXne, I don't think you can avoid this accounting, other than to just ignore the request and see what happens. If I were the judge, I would order you to account.

Hope this helps.
socrateaser and 9 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you