How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Law Educator, Esq. Your Own Question
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 118268
Experience:  JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Law Educator, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I am appealing pro se, a final order that was rendered March

This answer was rated:

I am appealing pro se, a final order that was rendered March 18,2013, in a civil Florida circuit court. In the process of preparing my appellate brief, I discovered that the lawyer I had earlier retained failed to enter into the record some important information that would have prevented a fundamental adverse judgment in the same case, rendered 2/2013. Florida requires that a notice of appeal be filed within 30 days, which is now past due. Can I file a motion for a new hearing of the entire case based on ineffective counsel, or is a legal malpractice suit agains the lawyer my only recourse?
Additionally, my understanding is that you cannot produce new evidence that was not presented in the lower court. Does this prevent me from presenting this information in my appellate brief?
Thank you for your question. I look forward to working with you to provide you the information you are seeking.

I am afraid that unlike criminal cases where you can argue ineffective assistance of counsel, in civil cases I am afraid if your attorney did not properly pursue your case this is not ground for a rehearing or reconsideration if this evidence was available to your attorney during trial. Your recourse for your attorney not doing their job and being negligent in failure to introduce evidence that would have prevented the judgment would be to sue the attorney for malpractice and seek the money damages from him that his negligence caused you to suffer.

If the evidence was not presented or argued in the lower court you cannot raise it for first time on appeal I am afraid.

Thank you so much for using I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered. PLEASE use REPLY to EXPERT if you would like more information or if you feel something was not included in your answer.

Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO RECEIVE ANY CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.

Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.

Customer: replied 4 years ago.

This lawyer withdrew 1 week before the 2/2013 hearing, the same day the February date for the hearing was set. I filed a motion for postponement of the hearing which was denied . Does the total lack of any representation give me any ability to get a new trial? unrepresented at the hearing.

Thank you for you response.

With the lawyer withdrawing one week before the hearing, this is grounds to appeal based on the court abusing its discretion in not giving you a continuance to properly prepare your case or to hire another attorney. That is a ground you can assert on appeal.
Customer: replied 4 years ago.

Can you give me some Florida case law that would support this?

Thank you for you response. Please understand we are not a case law research service because of the cost of such research exceeding the scope of this service. I sincerely apologize.

However, you must prove the withdrawal did not comply with the ethics rules on withdrawing from a case.

The Rule Regulating Florida Bar 4-1.16(b) provides:

(b) When withdrawal is allowed. Except as stated in subdivision (c), a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client if withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the interests of the client, or if:

(1) the client persists in a course of action involving the lawyer's services that the lawyer reasonably believes is criminal or fraudulent;

(2) the client has used the lawyer's services to perpetrate a crime or fraud;

(3) a client insists upon pursuing an objective that the lawyer considers repugnant or imprudent;

(4) the client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer regarding the lawyer's services and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the obligation is fulfilled;

(5) the representation will result in an unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer or has been rendered unreasonably difficult by the client; or

(6) other good cause for withdrawal exists.

This rule permits withdrawal from a case even if the interests of the client are adversely affected, provided one of the six grounds is present.

If your attorney did not present one of these grounds, he did not have good cause for such a late withdrawal and that is what you argue on appeal. Denial of continuance to find new counsel where counsel withdraws late and client is not able to prepare case at late date is abuse of discretion. See: Citrin v. De Venny, 833 So.2d 871 (Fla. App., 2003) (court held late withdrawal of attorney and client's mental status preventing him from preparing for case was good cause for continuance and court held it was abuse of discretion not to grant such continuance).
Law Educator, Esq. and 8 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you