How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Law Educator, Esq. Your Own Question
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 118200
Experience:  JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Law Educator, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

My question is for PaulMJD, please Mr. Paul: I turned my

This answer was rated:

My question is for PaulMJD, please
Mr. Paul: I turned my informal brief in on May 31 -- I am wondering what to expect now? Today is day 10, I thought (if it went like before the trial) that the other side would have 10 days to answer? Do you have any idea what's next? Thank you, again.
Thank you for your update.

When the other side answers, they have to send you a copy of their answer. You also need to check with the court to see if any answer was filed to the appeal. All you can do is wait on the court of appeals now as they will review the briefs and will issue a ruling, which can take 3-12 months depending on how busy they are at this time. If the court wants to hear oral argument on some part of your issue, they will send you a notice of appearance to make your oral arguments. If they do not want oral argument all you can do is wait until you get their ruling.

Thank you so much for using I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered. PLEASE use REPLY to EXPERT if you would like more information or if you feel something was not included in your answer.

Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO ***** CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.

Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.

Law Educator, Esq. and 3 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 3 years ago.

Mr. Paul, I am trying to address a matter of fraud that was not addressed in my trial, and I am in need of some advice on the time frame for addressing a matter of fraud when fraud is discovered after a verdict has been given in a case?

There was evidence used by the opposing side's expert witness in my trial for which I have found additional evidence (after the trial) to support that there was not only fraud regarding the evidence used to form their expert's opinion, but that the effort to deceive regarding this evidence was intentional. (the evidence I had during the trial regarding this was not presented or submitted as evidence in my trial, so the jury did not deliberate or make a decision with any knowledge that any of the evidence was fraudulent)

In my trial, the Judge admitted the evidence the expert used into my trial with no problems, and their expert gave testimony to the jury basing his opinion on this (I understand from reading- I am not a lawyer- that part of a Judge's job during trial is to determine whether any of the evidence that the parties want to use is illegal or improper? If that is so, he accepted and admitted that evidence the expert witness used with no indication that he thought it was illegal or improper.

In my case, the Judge stated he polled the jury after the trial and they stated they gave the verdict to the other side because they believed the other side's expert witness (whose testimony was based on only this fraudulent evidence.)

I appealed my case and lost (not surprising since I'm not a lawyer).

So I am wondering if you can give me advice about this -- again, after trial, I found some irrefutable evidence that the evidence their expert witness used was not only fraudulent, with part of it hidden from the expert, but that the hiding of this evidence was intentionally done. (and again, I did have other evidence before the trial that was not presented in the trial, but put all together now, it is definitive proof of this intentional deception- the evidence the expert witness used was itself fraudulent, and other parts of the evidence (which would have told the truth in this matter) were hidden from him. I have found case law Hazel-Atlas which states "Likewise, in cases where the fraud is discovered after judgment has already been entered, courts typically vacate or set aside the fraudulently begotten judgment no matter how long it has been in effect." and also "Equitable relief against fraudulent judgments is not of statutory creation. It is a judicially devised remedy fashioned to relieve hardships which, from time to time, arise from a hard and fast adherence to another court-made rule, the general rule that judgments should not be disturbed after the term of their entry has expired" This case precedent also seems to relieve me of the burden of having to have put all the fraud matters together before the trial: "(a) Even if Hazel failed to exercise due diligence to uncover the fraud, relief may not be denied on that ground alone, since public interests are involved. P. 322 U. S. 246." (The company committing the fraud continually deals with hundreds of thousands of members of the public across the US)

My appeal was decided at the end of February this year. During the time I filed the appeal (28 days after the trial ended) I also petitioned the Judge to overturn the verdict because of the fraud but he answered he could not deal with this matter because I had already filed an appeal.

So I am wondering what time frame limits you know about to advise me if this this matter can be taken back up now that the appeal is over?

One lawyer I spoke with said there's no doubt the fraud can be proved, but that they would have to involve not just the party who committed the fraud, but the main party the suit was against, (whom they have a conflict of interest with), so they can't take the case. That lawyer did express concerns about a statute of limitations in this, though-- but he was not aware of this Hazel-Atlas case, (which was used in a more recent 2002 case Cobell v Norton). Additionally, a second lawyer I spoke to yesterday said the same things - great proof of fraud, but he is also questioning the statute of limitations (I gave him this case to look at-- do you have knowledge of these statutes?


trial dec 2012,

filed appeal within 28 days, (also wrote Judge of trial court about this but answered couldn't deal with it because it was under appeal in another court)

appeal answered (I lost) late Feb 2014

You have been an invaluable source of information for me throughout this whole ordeal, and I would much appreciate your input about time rules and fraud-- do I press on and try to find a firm to handle this to prove that the jury gave a wrong ruling because they believed an expert who had evidence I can now prove was not only fraudulent, but intentionally so, and ask for default judgment?

Thank you for your response and update.

I am sorry to hear you lost your appeal, but you now have to go back to the court that issued your verdict and file the motion to vacate based on fraud and you need to prove fraud by clear and convincing evidence. This is very tough to do, but you have the case law to do so and you need to hurry to file because you have 1 year from the ruling to file, but you can argue that was stayed pending the decision on the appeal.

I really wish you could get local attorney on this, as based on what you said it sounds like you were simply out-lawyered and you had a good case but just struggled with presentation and examination of experts. If you can get another attorney to get involved you should continue to try to do so, but you are getting near the end and if you cannot get it vacated it is likely over.
Customer: replied 3 years ago.

I am trying to find a firm, but the 4 national companies involved keep creating conflicts. I found the one lawyer yesterday that I mentioned who doesn't have conflicts, but is not in a firm and I would have to pay as I go along and I just don't have the resources to afford that. If I am searching on, can you recommend the keywords to type in to find the appropriate type of firm to handle this, who might be able to do a contingency? I have been trying to search in states where three of these companies don't have offices, the fourth company has offices worldwide, but there are thousands of firms, so if you know of what keywords I should type in, that would help a whole lot? Thank you, again!

Thank you for your reply.

Try, and and look for construction law attorneys as those would be the best to handle these types of cases.
Law Educator, Esq. and 3 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you