Legal

Ask a Lawyer and Get Answers to Your Legal Questions

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

Legal
This answer was rated:

Hi Lucy, I thought I had posted a new question for you here

but i cant see it...
Hi Lucy, I thought I had posted a new question for you here but i cant see it ?
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Answered in 5 minutes by:
5/23/2013
Lucy, Esq.
Lucy, Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 31,007
Experience: Lawyer
Verified
Good morning,

I'm sorry, but I don't see any questions that haven't been answered. Can you repost it?
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
Yes, this is the question. Again, a new error in the file, as I am reviewing the docket with x-rays...

Plaintiff served a motion for leave to file a 2nd amended complaint in May 2012, but it is not filed, nor is the order granting the leave,, nor is the amended complaint to be found in the docket.

this is prejudiciable to me, and more so to my wife for the reason that there is a valid order to attach contracts as per rule 1.130 and there again, the order is ignored because the Plaintiff comes up with a back-rent claim. And the prejudice is that the amendment and the Final Judgment are founding themselves on an expired contract, replaced by 5 other successive contracts, that Plaintiff has voluntarily failed to attache in order to hide them to the attention of the Court as they invalidate his claims.

My lawyer however filed an answer to that amended complaint.

Question : Do I have the right to object NOW ?

If yes, which instrument ? OBECTION or part of my motion to leave to amend ?
The 2nd Amended Complaint should be attached to the Motion. The fact that your attorney files a response suggests that they must have at least served you with a copy. It's odd that it's not somewhere in the docket, though.

The problem is, since you filed an Answer, they're going to say that you waived any objection to the Second Amended Complaint. It's also hard to argue that the motion to amend wasn't granted - why file an Answer if the judge didn't allow the request? I realize that it was your attorney who filed it and not you, but he's your agent and his actions are attributable to you. Is there any way to ask him how he got the Second Amended Complaint, since you don't show it anywhere?

You may have a valid argument related to the plaintiff's repeated failure and refusal to produce documents that he had been ordered to produce. But I'm not sure that the fact that the Second Amended Complaint wasn't filed is the way to make that argument.
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
>>how he got the Second Amended Complaint, since you don't show it anywhere?

It was served to him.

The problem lies also with the order granting leave to file the amendment. It's not in the docket.


This is probably why Plaintiff could not file his amended complaint.
Now, this is also the one that is fraudulent and probably the best example for the Doctrine of Estoppel

.Previously Plaintiff was alleging that we ceased to reside at the property, now he alleges that we continued to reside at the property in view to claim back-rents on an expired contract.


The amendment is attaching the expired contract again, same situation that caused dismissal previously and the order to attach contracts.

In addition, it is fraudulent because Plaintiff has sent a sworn affidavit of loss to his insurance company, stating that the house was uninhabitable after the flood and we moved out and the lease was vacated, hence losses of rents.

Same rents as those claimed for in his amendment..

The lease contract in effect at the date where we vacated is not exhibited.
Instead, Plaintiff exhibits the expired one. Reason : if he exhibits the missing contracts that he was ordered to attach, his claims go to the ground asap.



















I still feel like, by filing an Answer to the Second Amended Complaint, any objection to it not being filed is waived. The judge saw it as part of the Motion to Amend and a reply was filed. If he granted a Motion to Amend without seeing the Amended Complaint attached, the time to object would have been there.

If you're compiling errors for appeal, that may be something to mention (if you can find any place that it was raised earlier). But I don't think the judge would grant a new trial on that basis.
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
If he granted a Motion to Amend

There is no such order in the docket ?

Then why would your attorney file an Answer? It only makes sense for him to have done that if the judge granted the motion.
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
It could have been granted verbally, but my point is about the right to object to the order. How can it be exercised if the order is not filed, which is the case here ?.

I assume that my lawyer filed an answer 1 month later possibly by mistake because he had been served the motion for grant to leave to amend with the amended complaint attached and he must have thought that it was the right thing to do to counter the motion of my opponent. Alternatively, there was a hearing and a verbal order at the hearing.

In all likelihood, I have seen at the law library some cases where the court of appellate have voided written orders becuase they were not sufficiently founding themselves. So when it is a verbal order, would it not be logical to think that it's voidable or not operable ?
You're trying to void the order based on something that happened after it was entered. If the order was unfounded, that would have to be based on a circumstance that existed at the time it was entered.

It's also entirely possible that the judge stated at the hearing that the Amended Complaint served with the Motion would be accepted into the record. It would help if you had a recording from that hearing, or if your attorney is willing to tell you what happened. But I still stand by what I said initially, which is that filing the Answer waives all of these arguments. The time to object to a motion granting leave to amend a complaint is before the Answer is filed.

Also keep in mind that the standard for allowing amendment is extremely liberal and that these requests are usually granted. That makes it even more difficult to show that the judge abused his discretion in allowing it, which is the standard on appeal.
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
to be based on a circumstance that existed at the time it was entered.

Exactly,and the circumstances were the following :

Plaintiff attached - again - the expired contract that he had attached to his initial complaint.

That complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Additionally an order to attach the missing contracts was issued.

It had been established that the contract was expired then .

That first order was never voided.

So when Plaintiff comes up with a SECOND Amended complaint and again attaches same expired contract, is he not in contempt of the court's first order ?

If any order is validating his motion, does it not need to explain why the court has a different opinion as to enforcing rule 1.130 ?

A verbal order issued at the trial hearing - IF THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED - can still be objected 10 days after it has been filed.

On which ground can i file an objection to a verbal order ?

ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF's motion : The above is not something to answer or to object to Plaintiff.

It's to be objected to the court.

So therefore is the fact of having filed an answer to his motion not irrelevant ?

Note that the filing (of my answer) must have taken place WELL AFTER THE ASSUMED VERBAL ORDER AT THE ASSUMED HEARING.

It's incredibly difficult to address these arguments, because there's a gaping hole in the facts. Why did you attorney file an Answer to a Complaint that was never filed? That doesn't make any sense. It doubly doesn't make sense if the Complaint was already dismissed. There has to be something that happened that you're not aware of. If a judge dismisses my case, and I for some reason file an Answer anyway, the case doesn't just continue - the case is over.

Putting all of that aside, you haven't said anything to make me think that you can raise an objection now, after trial is over, to the fact that the plaintiff served a Motion for Leave to file an Amended Complaint but never filed the Amended Complaint. This is because it's too late, because you never raised the argument earlier, and because filing a response to a document is going to waive objections to the document being filed. I can't file an Answer to a Complaint and then file a Motion to Dismiss later. These arguments have to be raised at the time they are relevant - not after the trial is over. Again, I'm sorry.
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
>>>to the fact that the plaintiff served a Motion for Leave to file an Amended Complaint but never filed the Amended Complaint.


Lucy, this is not my point at all. My point is about objecting the assumed order, read my reasons above. I seriously question the validity of it, other than not being filed.I also tend to believe that because it hasn't been filed, it is still objectionable.


Then I misunderstood, and I apologize.

I agree that the judge shouldn't have given leave to amend (assuming that he did) after the Complaint was dismissed. What you have to argue is that he abused his discretion in doing so. If the Complaint was dismissed with prejudice (you may have to go back and look at the order), the case should have been done and decided. If you filed a Motion opposing the request to amend the complaint back then, you have preserved the right to appeal the order allowing amendment (again, assuming that happened).
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
I did file a motion to strikeHowever, we see here that this court is entertaining confusing situations for a purpose or not. On the other hand, with the kind of mistakes my lawyer did, i have a hard time to try to put things straightRemember, I was granted a re-hearing, so I want to bring this in a motion, with other stuff. And what I want to bring is that if any order was granted to file the SECOND amended complaint, it would be an error if it does not stipulate why Plaintiff is not obliged here to follow the rule 1.130 and the previous order to attach the contracts and attaches the same contract as before, an expired one, that has caused involuntary dismissalCheck this linkhttp://www.floridabar.org/divcom/jn/jnjournal01.nsf/Author/4AAFD375277AC59B852573FA007A0362
Customer reply replied 4 years ago

I think the point here is denial of due process, when the order is not filed, therefore not objectionable.

 

Procedural jurisdiction defects can he heard anytime when the error quelifies as fundamental, as per the FL Bar opinions

Due process requires notice and an opportunity to be heard. That's why the rules allowing amendment are so liberal - the law prefers allowing cases to be heard on their merits, rather than dismissed on technicalities. So, I don't think that due process is the best argument here. You got your day in court.

The hearing that you're having should be rather narrowly focused. You made it sound like it's really just a motion for rehearing based on your letter, which addressed the judgment itself and errors at trial. I really don't think the judge is going to hear additional issues that weren't brought up in the motion or the letter.

A request to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction would be done via a Motion to Dismiss, not a Motion for New Trial or Motion for Rehearing following trial. But I'm still not following your thought process on claiming that the court didn't have jurisdiction. Jurisdiction just means whether a case can be brought in the first place. It doesn't tend to come into play on issues other than "Does the court have authority over this party?" and "Is the court allowed to hear this type of case?" (Contracts, tort, probate, etc.)
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago

lack of jurisdiction would be on the person of my corporation when the final judgement is finding without any evidence , in an automatic way, that a check paid by plaintiff to my company is causing an unjust enrichment in my favor. There is a non-written and non found assumption that my corporation is automatically my alter ego. I have seen many cases being reversed when the court had considered that a company is the alter-ego of his CEO or shareholder without any findings whatsoever.

I have reveiwed many cases where it is made clear that the Court need to find some kind of behaviors and patterns of shareholders or officers to treat a Corporation as their alter-ego.

In order to reach that ppint, the corporation must be part of the trial.

Plaintiff is suing the wrong party, and becuase he failed to join indispensable party to action, he cannot claim thta a check to my corporation is a check to me. When looking at the merits, he was owing that money to the corporation, but the case was never against my corporation and there was no reason why it should have participated spontaneously.

What do you think?

BTW if the court vacates the amended final judgement, does it re-instate the final judgement and so the Court would need to vacate both ?

I think you already answere dto that one

I agree that the plaintiff sued the wrong party. If he wants to say that you and the corporation are the same, then there has to be findings of fact that you and the company are one and the same, and it sounds like that never happened.

It's up to the judge to decide whether to reinstate the original judgment or enter an entirely new judgment. He's allowed to do either.
Lucy, Esq.
Lucy, Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 31,007
Experience: Lawyer
Verified
Lucy, Esq. and 87 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Ask Lucy, Esq. Your Own Question
Lucy, Esq.
Lucy, Esq.
Lucy, Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 31,007
31,007 Satisfied Customers
Experience: Lawyer

Lucy, Esq. is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

Not only did he answer my Michigan divorce question but was also able to help me out with it, too. I have since won my legal case on this matter and thank you so much for it.

LeeMichigan

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Tina

Tina

Lawyer

8,775 satisfied customers

JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.

Ely

Ely

Counselor at Law

24,353 satisfied customers

Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.

INFOLAWYER

INFOLAWYER

Attorney

20,727 satisfied customers

Licensed attorney helping individuals and businesses

JPEsq

JPEsq

Attorney

2,132 satisfied customers

Experience as general attorney, in house counsel, SSDI, Family Law attorney, and law professor

Law Educator, Esq.

Law Educator, Esq.

Attorney

42,358 satisfied customers

JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law

Ellen

Ellen

Lawyer, Consultant

8,238 satisfied customers

25 years of experience helping people like you.

Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.

Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.

Attorney

292 satisfied customers

7+ years of experience handling various legal matters.

< Previous | Next >

Related Legal Questions
I filed a motion to dismiss under 12 6 and 12 5,, the judge
I filed a motion to dismiss under 12 b 6 and 12 b 5,, the judge denied the motion on 12 b 6, however, stated that the plaintiff serve or file proof of service by a certain date. The plaintiff did neit… read more
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
42,358 satisfied customers
If a debtor in a chapter 11 files a motion to dismiss their
If a debtor in a chapter 11 files a motion to dismiss their bankruptcy case, and if the motion is granted by the bk court, when can the same debtor file for a new bankruptcy case? I am looking to unde… read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
7,385 satisfied customers
IN THE NY STATE APPELLATE DIVISION COURT THE RULE OF R
IN THE NY STATE APPELLATE DIVISION COURT THE RULE OF R 670.10.2 (6 ) (i ) states Exhibits which are relevant to a cause may be omitted upon a stipulation of the parties which shall contain a list of t… read more
LegalPro54
LegalPro54
Doctoral Degree
1,258 satisfied customers
I need someone to review a consultant contract for insurance
I need someone to review a consultant contract for insurance adjusting. … read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
30,877 satisfied customers
Can you tell me how to respond to a motion to dismiss I am
please can you tell me how to respond to a motion to dismiss I am the plaintiff … read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
30,877 satisfied customers
Esq.(ONLY) Motion to dismiss the foreclosure complaint was
For Law Educator, Esq.(ONLY) Good day, Motion to dismiss the foreclosure complaint was denied. I am preparing to file objection to the foreclosure complaint base on the fact that the property is prote… read more
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
42,358 satisfied customers
1) I have to answer a motion to dismiss where I am the
Second opinion] Hello 1) I have to answer a motion to dismiss where I am the Plaintiff in US District Court. Will the judge grant me an extension to answer past the 21 days if I request it, if so what… read more
socrateaser
socrateaser
1,031 satisfied customers
If a person filed a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case and
If a person filed a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case and that point of the motion was clarified. Can a bankruptcy be dismissed because that person brings up other points in court that were not on t… read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
7,385 satisfied customers
I filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds of res judicata.
I filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds of res judicata. I am still involved in the case as it is set for trial in December. In 1998 I was tried for inoperable vehicles on my business property. I w… read more
TJ, Esq.
TJ, Esq.
Juris Doctor (JD)
11,257 satisfied customers
After failing to schedule my "Expedited Motion to Dismiss
After failing to schedule my "Expedited Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing" for over a year, the judge finally scheduled a hearing on this motion as well as the plaintiff's newly briefed Motion to… read more
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
42,358 satisfied customers
What is a Notice of Lack of Prosecution, Motion to dismiss
What is a Notice of Lack of Prosecution, Motion to dismiss for Lack Of Prosecution, Notice of Hearing and Self Executing Order of Dismissal mean … read more
Barrister
Barrister
Attorney/Landlord/Realtor
Doctoral Degree
35,343 satisfied customers
Law Educator, Esq. (Only) I filed amended motion to dismiss
Law Educator, Esq. (Only) I filed amended motion to dismiss before. You advised me yesterday to amend it and add the homestead exemption issue. should I withdraw the first amended motion to dismiss an… read more
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
42,358 satisfied customers
Looking for a sample of a motion to dismiss in northampton
Looking for a sample of a motion to dismiss in northampton county pa in a civil case over a contract. Statue of limitations and res- judicada.… read more
KLAW
KLAW
Juris Doctorate
1,769 satisfied customers
Looking for example of a motion to dismiss in PA on Statue
Looking for example of a motion to dismiss in PA on Statue of Limitations. Civil Complaint.… read more
Bill Attorney
Bill Attorney
law
1,604 satisfied customers
The judge denied defendants motion to dismiss but is
The judge denied defendants motion to dismiss but is allowing a reconsider I have to reply on.Is there possibly a law that states even if a commercial truck thinks they even just hit an existing potho… read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
30,877 satisfied customers
I received a letter for. A motion to dismiss which reads as
I received a letter for. A motion to dismiss which reads as follows, comes now the court ,pursuant to rule 41 and directs that all parties appear to consider whether this. Case should be dismissed for… read more
LegalPro54
LegalPro54
Doctoral Degree
1,258 satisfied customers
Law Educator, Esq. (ONLY) This is on the motion to dismiss
Law Educator, Esq. (ONLY) This is on the motion to dismiss that the plaintiff does not want the Judge to see. I went to Court on the 14th for the motion but I was very sick. I filed a motion tor conti… read more
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
42,358 satisfied customers
In a motion to dismiss in the State of PA. Do you have
In a motion to dismiss in the State of PA.Do you have request a hearing on this matter or can it be a brief?I have filed motions for extensions in motions court and did not have to schedule anything, … read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
7,385 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x