Legal

Ask a Lawyer and Get Answers to Your Legal Questions

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

Legal

We were corresponding. our question got closed - I think I

Customer Question
asked too many personal, irrelevant...
We were corresponding. our question got closed - I think I asked too many personal, irrelevant questions. But I am stuck in the middle and confused. Can we just finish quick? Please? I'll make sure to stick to the point... Daniel
Submitted: 4 years ago.Category: Legal
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Answered in 9 minutes by:
3/24/2013
Lawyer: LADYLAWYER, Lawyer replied 4 years ago
LADYLAWYER
LADYLAWYER, Lawyer
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 6,536
Experience: Civil; Family; HOA; Landlord/Tenant; Real Estate; Probate; Insurance; Immigration; Wills & Trusts
Verified

LADYLAWYER : Hello, Thanks for choosing Justanswer.com! I look forward to helping you with legal information today.
LADYLAWYER : Hey Daniel, yes, the moderators closed it and said that I had answered the same questions over and over and needed to move on. Sorry, I figured it was just a matter of time.
LADYLAWYER
LADYLAWYER, Lawyer
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 6,536
Experience: Civil; Family; HOA; Landlord/Tenant; Real Estate; Probate; Insurance; Immigration; Wills & Trusts
Verified
LADYLAWYER and 87 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Lawyer: LADYLAWYER, Lawyer replied 4 years ago
Hey,

You rated my answer and it closes the chat. :) No worries, what was your last legal question?
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
ok. well I opened a new one. so you get paid for it. It's for me, not for them. They run the site, but I know when it's clear or not. and I am confused on this point (actually, honestly):

if it's something of value, then wouldn't pretty much everyone be doing it?

because a husband pays for his wife and her house, etc, and she gives im back love but also sex.

or, a girl finds a rich boyfriend...

Then where does one draw the line? - the reason it's important is because if I don't find my answer, I am not going to think that everything is prostitution is exchange happens and will do nothing on the subject of relationships...
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
I closed the chat by accident. or I mean replied to you.
Lawyer: LADYLAWYER, Lawyer replied 4 years ago
If one can prove there is an actual relationship between them and the other person they are giving things of value to and accepting sex from, then that would not be prostitution or solicitation. I have never seen a prosecutor prosecute a person where there is evidence of an actual relationship between two parties. The legislature clearly did not intend to make the statute this far reaching. It is against common sense and public policy.

No crime of prostitution, solicitation and pandering are the same, each case is different. As they might be similar, it ultimately depends on the evidence. In a Penal Code 647 prostitution case, prosecutors must prove that at least one the following elements exist:

Solicitation from one party to the other for an act of prostitution
The agreement to commit an act of prostitution
Actually commit an act of prostitution
Solicitation of lewd conduct

A Prosecutors job is to prove there was an arrangement to engage in an act of prostitution. They usually gain proof with a recorded conversation between an undercover police officer and the accused. If they cannot produce a recording of the conversation, the arrangement may be difficult to prove. If the accused has no money at the time of arrest, the prosecution may have a difficult time proving there was specific intent to engage in an act of prostitution. I do get that it is hard to understand the nuances of how things can be different in theory and in practice, but in the legal world, this is especially true.

Ask Your Own Legal Question
Lawyer: LADYLAWYER, Lawyer replied 4 years ago
In order to prove that a defendant solicited or agreed to engage in prostitution the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant actually intended to engage in a sex act for compensation. If the defendant was joking around, flirting, or simply curious, but had no intention of actually carrying out a sex for money exchange, that defendant is not guilty of violating Penal Code section 647(b). Further, a defendant who can prove an actual relationship exists between s/he and the other party, proves that they had no specific intent to "engage in the act of prostitution." If the specific intent cannot be proven, then the defendant cannot be considered guilty of the act based upon the definition of the statute.
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
ok. I think I am getting close to understanding. So, there has to be an "arrangement"? - If there is simply exchange, it's not prostitution... Let's say someone takes a girl to an expensive dinner, buys her a ring, she sleeps with him. But there was no "arrangement." correct? would that be different that saying: "if I buy you this ring, will you sleep with me?"

this might seem trivial to you, but it's important to me. Because I have always given girls presents, chocolates, etc. Obviously not to sleep with them, necessarily. But I need to see where just simply "courting" turns into prostitution.

And, in my case which I described, it was not such, because my proposed wishes were of no value, or because there was no intent (from the legal viewpoint) even though there might have been intention to do it from my side?

I also just need to know because I work for the courts, etc, and in other areas have high standards, so if someone ever asks "have you ever solicited prostitution?" I need to say "no" with a clear conscience, not just because someone might find out...So I am going to stop philosophizing here and if you tel me that I am fine, I am done with my case...
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
oh, I see. and who or what establishes intent? the act of showing up?

in my case, when I put the ad up, I had the intention to play that game (otherwise I wouldn't have put it up). But the normal English "intent" or "intention" must be different than how you're using it in the legal sense?
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
I think I get it. Intent means the intention to commit a crime, wittingly, knowingly. But then, here's the trick - I once offered someone a ride for money. I had no idea that this was illegal in LA. so there was no intent. But I was arrested, they called it "pirate taxi cab." So I had the "intent" because I showed up. So "intent" must not mean "the desire to commit a crime knowingly." It must mean "the intention to do the action" (and it doesn't matter if a person knows it's illegal or not). Am I right? If a Zulu came to US and he had no clue prostitution was not illegal, and he tried it, he could still be arrested...yeah?
Lawyer: LADYLAWYER, Lawyer replied 4 years ago
The arresting officer believes he has enough evidence to arrest you based on specific intent (again, fact specific), and then the prosecutor tries to prove you had the specific intent, and then the jury decides if the prosecutor has proved that you had specific intent beyond a reasonable doubt.

It's not whether you intended to play the game. It's whether you specifically intended to engage or solicit prostitution.

Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
No, I certainly didn't. But in the example I gave you with the car above, I also didn't intend to do anything illegal. I just showed up to give someone a ride for money, but it was a set up. I had no clue it was against the law. they said it didn't matter.

so, to wrap it up. if I'm even with a girl in a cafe, bar, wherever, and I tell her of the same game, would it be prostitution? technically her wishes could have been material - clothes, car, etc.

Is it best to just stay as far away from this as possible? or get into a relationship, perhaps...? that's off the subject already.
Lawyer: LADYLAWYER, Lawyer replied 4 years ago
That's correct. There is a saying in the legal world that "ignorance of the law is no excuse”. In other words, you can’t claim to be exempt from liability under a law just because you didn’t know there was such a law.
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Lawyer: LADYLAWYER, Lawyer replied 4 years ago
I think we have been over this, but yes, I think it would be best to stay away from stuff like this lest you come across an ambitious police officer or prosecutor who wants to try to make an example out of you.

I really do need to be going now. My eyes are starting to get heavy. :)
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
this is all extremely confusing. seems contradictory. It's not the complexity of law. it's some basic or term I don't get.

on the one hand, you said that if there was not intent (like in my case), it's not a crime. On the other hand, that not knowing the law (not having the intent to break it) is no excuse. So how does it work?

by intent, is it meant the intention to commit a crime or simply to carry out the action?
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
to save you time and trouble, you can tell me where to read up on it, if you know. if not, I can research myself. Because I don't want to keep asking you questions, but it's confusing right now. I am far from stupid, but I no longer understand if I did something wrong or not, and where the crime would begin and simple flirtation would end. SO I can research on my own, if you like.
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
ok, good night! sleep well. I won't keep you longer.

Daniel
Lawyer: LADYLAWYER, Lawyer replied 4 years ago
I don't think I could tell you to go anywhere that will give you as much detail as I have here.

What I told you was not contradictory. You do have to have specific intent to engage in prostitution to be guilty of it. Whether you knew it was illegal or not is of no consequence. If you intended to engage in sex for the exchange of money or something else of consequential value, then you have engaged in prostitution by definition. Whether you knew that doing this was illegal or not has nothing to do with whether you had the specific intent to engage in the act.

I need to go offline now. I am happy to open the question up to other experts if you think that might help. Perhaps it is a communication issue.
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
No, it's fine. You were very thorough. I don't think anyone could have done better. It has nothing to do with your communication. It has to do with definition of terms, only. or with some important point I am missing. There is something I am not getting. I will review all your answers tomorrow and hopefully not need any more. Or at least formulate a few very crisp answers.

your info is not contradictory. the contradiction is in my head. I'll figure it out.

I think I don't totally get the words "intent" and "consequential value." will study them tomorrow. I just need to know is my wishes were "consequential value" and if my desire was "intent" or if "intent" only occurs upon arrival.

Daniel
Lawyer: LADYLAWYER, Lawyer replied 4 years ago
Okay, thanks. After reviewing it tomorrow, let me know if you want me to open it up. I won't be online tomorrow but I'll be back on Monday.

Thanks Daniel, sleep well!
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
Hi!

Sorry I didn't get back to you earlier. Had a busy weekend. Still haven't read through all the correspondence. Will do in a bit and get back to you

I have something else on my mind. I could open a new question, as it's new. But it's very simple: if someone does not have a work permit to work in the US, am I liable if I pay them? - basically someone was consulting me and I had no idea they were not ok to work in the US. She did a so-so job anyway, and I paid her half upfront and then in the middle she decided to bail out and say pay me the remaining hours (not all, just the 7 extra she worked). At that point I found out she was not ok to work here. She has a firm abroad, though.
So, if someone is working here and receiving money abroad, is that illegal, or what are the logistics? a very simple answer will do. Hope you had a good weekend:)
Lawyer: LADYLAWYER, Lawyer replied 4 years ago
Hi there! I had to laugh out loud a little as I am not sure there are any "simple" answers with you, ;) You do not need to open a new question, you can just accept this answer by rating it. I am glad to hear from you.


Under the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, it is unlawful to hire an alien, to recruit an alien, or to refer an alien for a fee, knowing the alien is unauthorized to work in the United States. It is equally unlawful to continue to employ an alien knowing that the alien is unauthorized to work. An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts. Constructive knowledge constituting a violation of federal law has been found where (1) the I-9 employment eligibility form has not been properly completed, including supporting documentation, (2) the employer has learned from other individuals, media reports, or any source of information available to the employer that the alien is unauthorized to work, or (3) the employer acts with reckless disregard for the legal consequences of permitting a third party to provide or introduce an illegal alien into the employer's work force. Knowledge cannot be inferred solely on the basis of an individual's accent or foreign appearance.

Actual specific knowledge is not required. For example, a newspaper article stating that ballrooms depend on an illegal alien work force of dance hostesses was held by the courts to be a reasonable ground for suspicion that unlawful conduct had occurred. Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his or her work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
got you. and is this the same with a consultant? if I don't hire them as an employee, but as an independent consultant?

I just need a legal reason to quote this person so that she doesn't ask for money anymore.

And yes, keep laughing. It's good therapy. The ancient Romans recommended it. Will be in touch.

Vladimir
Lawyer: LADYLAWYER, Lawyer replied 4 years ago
Hi,

Sorry, had to go offline for a little while. The employer sanctions provisions contain two exemptions. The first, a "grandfather" clause exempts from its provisions the continuing employment of unauthorized aliens hired on or before November 6, 1986, the date of the law's enactment. The second exempts "independent contractors" from the employment verification and sanctions provisions, provided the service provider falls within the strict definition of independent contractor. This includes "individual entities who carry on independent business, contract to do piece work according to their own means and methods, and are subject to control only as to results."

Indicia of independence include:
Who supplies tools/materials;
Whether services are available to public;
Whether work is done for other clients;
Whether there is an opportunity for profit or loss as a result of the labor; and
Who determines order, sequence, and time work is done.

Lastly, while you are not obliged to confirm the work authorization of anyone you hire as an independent contractor, if you know or have reason to know that an independent contractor is not authorized to work in the U.S., you can nevertheless be held liable.

If this woman is an illegal, you can report her to the UCIS's ICE division. You can find the local numbers here: http://www.criminalgovernment.com/docs/rel/aliens.html.

Ask Your Own Legal Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
Thanks! sorry for the late reply!

Hope your day went well:) Mine did. Very busy...

So freelancers CAN or CANNOT do it?

I know many companies outsource outside the US. is that different because the people working are physically outside?

Or, if someone works here, is it different if they receive money abroad rather than here?

For example, couldn't someone hire a US consultant to go do business in another country, or a Belgian consultant, let's say, to come work here, regardless of how he gets paid?

In this question (unlike the last), I don't need any heave references, legal language, etc. The simpler, the better:)

Vladimir



Ask LADYLAWYER Your Own Question
LADYLAWYER
LADYLAWYER
LADYLAWYER, Lawyer
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 6,536
6,536 Satisfied Customers
Experience: Civil; Family; HOA; Landlord/Tenant; Real Estate; Probate; Insurance; Immigration; Wills & Trusts

LADYLAWYER is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

Not only did he answer my Michigan divorce question but was also able to help me out with it, too. I have since won my legal case on this matter and thank you so much for it.

LeeMichigan

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Tina

Tina

Lawyer

8,775 satisfied customers

JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.

Ely

Ely

Counselor at Law

24,353 satisfied customers

Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.

INFOLAWYER

INFOLAWYER

Attorney

20,727 satisfied customers

Licensed attorney helping individuals and businesses

JPEsq

JPEsq

Attorney

2,132 satisfied customers

Experience as general attorney, in house counsel, SSDI, Family Law attorney, and law professor

Law Educator, Esq.

Law Educator, Esq.

Attorney

42,358 satisfied customers

JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law

Ellen

Ellen

Lawyer, Consultant

8,238 satisfied customers

25 years of experience helping people like you.

Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.

Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.

Attorney

292 satisfied customers

7+ years of experience handling various legal matters.

< Previous | Next >

Related Legal Questions
My car insurance policy was canceled because I was
Hi, my car insurance policy was canceled because I was ill-informed is there something I can do? … read more
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
42,358 satisfied customers
A life insurance policy which was cancelled in October,
a life insurance policy which was cancelled in October, November, and December, and on auto-pay has still not ceased. what to do? … read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
7,307 satisfied customers
When an employee completes a Claim of Exemption and Request
When an employee completes a Claim of Exemption and Request for Hearing on a Garnishment, do I continue the garnishment until the results of the hearing are known or does it "pause" the garnishment?… read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
7,307 satisfied customers
Bankruptcy question: I don't understand how the exemptions
Second opinion] Bankruptcy question: I don't understand how the exemptions work when you have moved from one state to another. I understand how you determine which exemptions apply and where you shoul… read more
Michael Bradley
Michael Bradley
JD
1,191 satisfied customers
I'm a contract employee but on the website as sales
Hi Pearl I'm a contract employee but on the website as sales director, and am supposed to participate in meetings. Can I refuse the meetings if I'm a contract worker? … read more
Damien Bosco
Damien Bosco
3,370 satisfied customers
I am founder of a tax-exempt federally recognized church
I am founder of a tax-exempt federally recognized church whose religious focus is exclusively based on biological females. I've been researching to confirm that we are exempt from anti-discrimination … read more
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
42,358 satisfied customers
Is there ever a med pay deductible on a homeowners policy?
Is there ever a med pay deductible on a homeowners policy? … read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
7,307 satisfied customers
If public policy bars a plaintiff from recovering on a
If public policy bars a plaintiff from recovering on a contract, would that be an issue on appeal?… read more
LegalGems
LegalGems
Juris Doctorate
10,647 satisfied customers
I need a religious vaccine exemption letter for an adult.
hi i need a religious vaccine exemption letter for an adult. how can i get one? … read more
Nisha Jones, Esq.
Nisha Jones, Esq.
Juris Doctorate
1,731 satisfied customers
Is an employee handbook a contract in Oklahoma? I am not
I am not sure to say "at will" since I don't understand what that means; however, I was full-time. Is this something that yu are asking me to kook up in the employee handbook? … read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
7,307 satisfied customers
I worked as a contract employee (GRA inc) for about a year
I worked as a contract employee (GRA inc) for about a year and a half. And our contract was with the Defense Health Agency. So basically I'm a contractor working for a federal government agency. I und… read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
7,307 satisfied customers
I need to know what the personal exemptions are for business
I need to know what the personal exemptions are for business bankruptcy in the State of Maryland. If the business, for example, has $250K in debt and were to declare bankruptcy and that amount is pers… read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
30,828 satisfied customers
I am a 1099 contract employee living on NC. I am contracted
I am a 1099 contract employee living on NC. I am contracted with a publishing company headquartered in Chicago. There are a lot of issues with this company. However, the most recent has caused me some… read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
7,307 satisfied customers
Can a policy owner borrow against a life policy without the
can a policy owner borrow against a life policy without the signature of an irrevocable beneficiary … read more
INFOLAWYER
INFOLAWYER
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
20,727 satisfied customers
Are newspaper carriers exempt for the enforcement of the
Are newspaper carriers exempt for the enforcement of the Arizona seatbelt law while they are engaged in the duties of delivering the newspapers? … read more
P. Simmons
P. Simmons
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
35,283 satisfied customers
I'm an non-exempt employee. Every 10 years I need to
I'm an non-exempt employee. Every 10 years I need to recredital my security clearance. My employer allowing some coworkers time to compete at work. I was told by my manager I have to complete my on my… read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
7,307 satisfied customers
I am an exempt employee that has approved FMLA. I only work
Hi, I am an exempt employee that has approved FMLA. I only work 4 days a week at 32-35 hours. My employer just notified me that I am going to be hourly since I am not working 40 hours a week. I live i… read more
Legal Eagle
Legal Eagle
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
7,307 satisfied customers
An employee of mine signed a contract when she is neither
An employee of mine signed a contract when she is neither authorised to do so or has the authority. Only one person may sign contracts and that is the Managing Director.The contract is almost a scam i… read more
Roy Hadavi
Roy Hadavi
Attorney
Juris Doctorate
980 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x