How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask RobertJDFL Your Own Question
RobertJDFL, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 13878
Experience:  Experienced in multiple areas of the law.
Type Your Legal Question Here...
RobertJDFL is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

how could swimwear count as pornography when we see it on kids

This answer was rated:

how could swimwear count as pornography when we see it on kids tv shows and in public places all the time? i dont think it makes any sense.
Thank you for your question.

Pictures of people in swimwear is not pornographic. The U.S. Justice department says that in order for something to be considered pornographic it has to meet the following criteria: it must focus on the genital area, mush show unnatural poses, must depict the person as a sex object or be willing to engage in sex, and it must be in a suggestive setting.

Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court has held in Miller v. California that obscenity was not protected speech. Further, the court ruled that each community is responsible for setting its own standards about what is considered to be obscene material. If pornographic material is prosecuted and brought to trial, a jury can deem it obscene based on:
  1. whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards" would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
  2. whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable state law; and
  3. whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.

The court spelled out a few clear examples of what it thought could be considered obscene:

  1. Patently offensive representations or descriptions of ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated
  2. Patently offensive representations or descriptions of masturbation, excretory functions and lewd exhibition of the genitals.

Granted, there may be magazines or ads that use models in suggestive poses, but if that were illegal, than anyone in possession of a "Sports Illustrated - Swimsuit Edition" would be guilty of owning pornography, and any family member that took a picture of a child in a swimsuit might be considered as owning pornography, and as you know, neither of these is true.


RobertJDFL and 9 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you