How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Hammer O'Justice Your Own Question
Hammer O'Justice
Hammer O'Justice, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 4498
Experience:  Almost 12 years of legal experience
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Hammer O'Justice is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How can ignorance of facts and law create a reasonable doubt

This answer was rated:

How can ignorance of facts and law create a reasonable doubt that the prosecution has proved the element of criminal intent? How does this relate to mens rea? In what situations might ignorance not be important?

Mistake of fact and/or law can negate intent, because the mistake means the person does not have the proper mens rea to commit a crime. For example, if Steve takes Mark's cell phone from a bar believing it is his because it is the same color and model as his, and he is charged with the crime of theft, he can use mistake of fact as a defense. Theft requires an intent to permanently deprive an individual of their property. Because Steve was mistaken about a fact relevant to the crime (i.e. that the phone was his), he should not be convicted because he did not have the appropriate mens rea ("guilty mind") or intent. Mistake of fact defenses are much more common than mistake of law defenses because one is presumed to know the laws and conform his or her behavior to them.

However, there are circumstances under which mistake of fact or law are not available defenses. These are primarily unavailable as defenses to strict liability crimes, because with a strict liability crime, the prosecution does not have to prove intent or mens rea. Rather, the mere fact that the criminal act occurred is enough to convict a person of the crime. For example, mistake of fact is not available in most jurisdictions to the crime of statutory rape. Often, defendants in these cases argue that they believed the victim was over the age of majority, either because they assumed wrongly the person's age or the victim actively lied about his/her age. However, because it is a strict liability offense, the fact that the person did not intend to have sexual relations with a minor is not a defense because the statute does not require proof of intent.

Hope this helps you out!
Hammer O'Justice and 4 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you