How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask JB Umphrey Your Own Question
JB Umphrey
JB Umphrey, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 20233
Experience:  Explains legal matters based on 14+ years experience.
Type Your Legal Question Here...
JB Umphrey is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

does a probation officer have a right to walk into your house

Resolved Question:

does a probation officer have a right to walk into your house and handcuff the person on probation and search the house when person who is not on probation is not at home
Submitted: 8 years ago.
Category: Legal
Expert:  JB Umphrey replied 8 years ago.
Thank you for using JustAnswer!

For the person that was on probation, did the order of probation provide that s/he would be subject to random house visits/checks?
Customer: replied 8 years ago.
it says that " allow your officer to visit in your home, at your employment site or elsewhere, and you will comply with all instructions your officer may give you."
Expert:  JB Umphrey replied 8 years ago.
Thank you. Several years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Knights, held that, to conduct a non-consensual search of a probationer’s home for ordinary law enforcement purposes under limited expectations of privacy, it is only necessary to show reasonable suspicion that the probationer is engaged in criminal activity.

Recently, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decided a case that involved a “walk through” of a probationer’s home that was based, not upon reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, but rather upon a Louisiana statute that authorized home verification visits of probationers. In the United States v. LeBlanc, LeBlanc’s probation officer went to his home, to conduct a home visit, which was authorized under Louisiana statute, if conducted at reasonable times and intervals. The probation officer informed LeBlanc, who was a convicted felon, that he was there to conduct a home visit and asked if he could “look around.” The probation officer testified that LeBlanc did not object and showed him around the entire house. The home visit, in its entirety, only lasted for about ten minutes and the probation officer did not physically move anything, open drawers, or inspect personal belongings. However, when they entered LeBlanc’s bedroom, the probation officer observed, in plain view, a .410 shotgun which he seized as evidence of LeBlanc’s probation violation.

Later, LeBlanc moved to suppress the gun, alleging that it was seized during an unlawful search, because the search exceeded the permissible scope of a home visit without reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct. The district denied the motion to suppress and LeBlanc appealed.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals first noted that the Supreme Court has recognized a “continuum” of expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment for probationers based upon the degree of punishment that a defendant is subjected to. Therefore, a court granting a defendant probation can impose reasonable conditions that deprive that defendant of some freedom that is enjoyed by law abiding citizens.

This means that courts can impose reasonable restrictions upon liberty and privacy in order to ensure that the probation serves as a period of genuine rehabilitation and that the community is not harmed by the probationer’s being free. v “Supervision, then, is a ‘special need’ of the State which permits a degree of impingement upon the privacy that would not be constitutional if applied to the public at large.”

From the facts that you described, the probation officer did nothing illegal.

Good luck and best wishes! I hope that you find this information to be helpful and this answer to be ACCEPTable!
Customer: replied 8 years ago.
but don't i still have my freedoms? they searched my things without my authority in saying that they are allowed to.
Expert:  JB Umphrey replied 8 years ago.
I understand your frustration. They didn't need your separate permission. When you opted to allow your boyfriend, who is on probation and subject to court orders, to stay at your place, you automatically gave up some of your rights to privacy during the course of his probation.

The alternatives are (a) kick him out of your place, or (b) he can avoid probation by simply serving jail instead.
JB Umphrey and 2 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you

Related Legal Questions