Can you help me with this practice question--I am confused…

Can you help me with this practice question--I am confused having read it over and over--now I am not sure.
D, a California resident, was recently hired as a personal computer sales agent for Compuco. Compuco was a world-wide manufacturer and retailer of personal computers with offices and sales in every state in the United States. D was also a golf enthusiast who enjoyed playing on different courses around the United States. While attending a Compuco company-wide sales convention in Orlando, Florida, D (who had never before been to Florida) decided to leave the convention one afternoon to play a round of golf on a nearby course. While playing golf, D had a conversation with P, a local Orlando resident. When P asked D what he did for a living, D (feeling guilty about leaving the convention early) reluctantly told P he sold computers for Compuco. P then told D that he was interested in purchasing a Compuco Model 500 computer. Sometime during the afternoon, P asked for D's business card and told D that on his next trip to California, he would come to D's Los Angeles office to see a Model 500 computer from Compuco. D told P that "you should visit the local Compuco retailer," but gave P one of D's business cards as requested. The next day D flew home to California. A week later, P also flew to California to visit an apartment building P owned in Los Angeles. While in Los Angeles, P went to the Compuco retail center in Los Angeles where D worked and purchased a Compuco Model 500 computer from D. When P returned to Florida and attempted to use the computer, he found that it would not operate properly. P was very upset because D had assured him when he picked up the computer in Los Angeles that the Compuco 500 was very "user friendly" and that P would have no difficulty learning to operate the computer.
P brought suit in a Florida state trial court against D to recover damages. Assuming that P personally served D with notice of the action in accordance with the Florida state long-arm statute, will D be subject to personal jurisdiction in Florida?
A Yes, because the events that led to the sale of the computer took place in Florida and thus D has purposefully availed himself of the benefits and protections of state laws sufficient to invoke minimum contacts.
B Yes, because Compuco has offices in Florida and D was an employee of Compuco.
C No, because D did not solicit business or initiate the conversation with P for the purpose of selling a computer such that he has not purposefully availed himself of the benefits and protections of Florida law.
D No, because the computer was purchased in California.