How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Seanna Your Own Question
Seanna, Tutor
Category: Homework
Satisfied Customers: 3088
Experience:  3,000+ satisfied customers, all topics, A+ work
Type Your Homework Question Here...
Seanna is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Respond to the following..Review the political tactics used

Resolved Question:

Respond to the following..Review the political tactics used by organizations described on pp.196-197 of the text...Have you experienced any of these tactics in your workplace?...Or have you heard anyone describe a situation in their workplace in which they experienced a political tactic?...Describe the situation and the political tactic...minimum of 200 word response.

Organizational Politics

The term politics has a negative connotation for some people. Managers who are

"political" are often viewed as people who have risen to the top not because of their

own merit but because of "whom they know" and their ability to "work the system."

These people believe political managers act in a self-interested way and wield power

to benefit themselves and not their companies. There is some truth to this negative

view. The scandals that plagued companies like Enron, Arthur Andersen, WorldCom,

and others are warning about what can happen at the top of a company if corrupt

managers are allowed to misuse their power.

Nevertheless, organizational politics can often be a positive force that helps a company

pursue its business model profitably. This is because managers striving to

improve the performance of a company often encounter resistance from other managers

who feel threatened by their actions and want to maintain the status quo (and

thus their personal benefits). To champion new products and increase profits, active,

forceful managers often need to engage in politics to get the support they need to

implement change. They often face resistance from other managers who, although

they might not be resistant to change, disagree with the specifics of how the changes

should be implemented. Indeed, in most business settings, politics is commonly used

to influence and persuade others.

Political Tactics

When managers use political tactics to increase their power, they sometimes find it

easier to persuade others. Some common tactics include attacking and blaming others

versus making everyone a "winner"; reducing uncertainty and using objective information;

being irreplaceable and in a central position; and building coalitions and

alliances. (These tactics are shown in Figure 6.10.)




TACTIC Two influential, but opposite, approaches can be effective in

different situations. The first approach is to attack and blame others. When pursuing

an attack-and-blame strategy, Manager "A" might spread the word to his or her colleagues

and higher-level managers that Manager "B" is the source of all the firm's

problems. The implication is that if these people would merely follow Manager's A's

suggested course of action, everyone would be better off. Sometimes the attack-and-

blame tactic occurs face-to-face in a meeting in which one manager comes under

attack from others. If a manager cannot defend his or her position, the manager leading

the attack will then find it easier to pursue his or her objectives. This tactic can be

particularly useful when several managers are competing for an important position

but only one will be chosen.

The second approach is to make everyone a "winner." When managers pursue the

make-everyone-a-winner tactic, they try to find a way to make a proposed course of

action benefit all the parties involved (or at least convince them that is the case). The

idea is to build a consensus. This approach is particularly effective when the active

cooperation of different functions or groups is needed to achieve a certain goal.



TACTIC Uncertainty is a threat for managers and their functions because it can

cause their performance to suffer. Valuable time and resources can be wasted because

people are uncertain about what must they do to achieve a particular goal. In the case

of Microsoft, for example, the risk is that Tammy Savage's group and the other

groups that work with it will develop software that the NetGen does not want. This

uncertainty can cause the developers to suffer a sort of paralysis and flounder. But

managers like Tammy Savage, who are able to understand the customer's needs and

can clearly articulate them, can reduce uncertainty by providing these people with a

vision and plan they can follow. This increases the power and influence a manager

has. In general, managers gain power when they can eliminate uncertainty for other

managers and groups.

Another way managers can reduce uncertainty and gain power is to collect and

distribute accurate information supporting the course of action they are proposing. In

many cases, the facts speak for themselves. This can lend a manager political credibility

and put the person in a better position to influence others. Still, even the most

accurate information has to be presented skillfully for a manager to gain support.



Managers gain power when they are irreplaceable, that is, when they have valuable

knowledge and expertise that that no one else has. The more influence a manager

gains by being irreplaceable, the more power he or she has to persuade others. Managers

also gain more influence when they are central, meaning that their activities are

highly visible. These managers and the people who work with them must do a good

job because if they don't, there is little chance the company will meet its goals. In most

cases, managers such as these have access to important company information, and

other members of the firm become dependent on them for their knowledge, advice,

and political support. As such these, managers have a great deal of influence. People

who are outstanding performers, have a great deal of knowledge, and have made

important and visible contributions to their companies are likely to be offered central

positions as managers. This works to increase their power.



build coalitions and alliances, they actively develop mutually beneficial relationships

with other people and groups, both inside and outside of their companies.

Unlike the make-everyone-a-winner strategy, this strategy is an ongoing activity. It

involves finding other parties of equal power and allying with them to either achieve

or sustain power. British Prime Minister Tony Blair and U.S. President George W.

Bush are good examples. Bush and Blair know if they combined forces, they are

more likely to influence people to follow the course of action they are proposing-

such as fighting terrorism. The partners in an alliance support one another because

they know they are far better off by cooperating versus competing with one another.

In terms of business organizations, sometimes this leads to needed changes, but in

other cases, this unity of power has an adverse effect on the firm. This is precisely

what happened at Kodak, discussed in Business in Action.





Submitted: 9 years ago.
Category: Homework
Expert:  Seanna replied 9 years ago.

You need to spend $3 to view this post. Add Funds to your account and buy credits.
Seanna and 3 other Homework Specialists are ready to help you

Related Homework Questions