Family Law

Family Law Questions? Ask a Family Lawyer Online.

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

Family Law

Filing this in the morning could I get a proof read and any

Customer Question
additional thoughts? I am a...
Filing this in the morning could I get a proof read and any additional thoughts? I am a pro se litigant against an attorney. This is my reply in opposition to his motion.On September 12th, 2016, Appellee filed a Memorandum in Opposition to Appellant’s motion and a Motion to Strike Appellant’s Brief. In the Appellee’s motion he asserts stipulations of rule 7.2. This must be a typographical error. It is believed that the rule that the Appellee is trying to assert may be 2.7. While the Appellant may have made a small error in regards ***** ***** page length requirement, of Loc. R 2.7(b), it was a misunderstanding that the signature and certificate of service must be inclusive of the 15 page limit, and not the egregious disregard of the rule by submitting 10 additional pages. All of the legal arguments were submitted within the 15 pages from the Appellant. The Appellee holds a complete disregard for the rule and requests that the court simply look the other way because he doesn’t believe his argument could be contained within the known parameters of this Court. Again, had the Appellee stuck to the facts of the case, he would not have had the need to consume such space.
The Federal Supreme Court has held that pro se litigants should be given less stringent standards and are allowed more latitude.
“In reviewing a pro se complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court must give the complaint the benefit of a liberal construction. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,520 (1972).”
“As pro se complaints are held "to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers." Greenhill v. Spellings, 482 F.3d 569, 572 (D.C.Cir.2007)
"Pro se litigants are allowed more latitude than litigants represented by counsel to correct defects in service of process and pleadings," Moore v. Agency for Int'l Dev., 994 F.2d 874, 876 (D.C.Cir. 1993),Second, the Appellee asserts that the Appellant violated App. R. 19, with regard to the font size of the submitted Brief. The Appellant’s Brief was submitted within the parameters of the rule with 12 point font, in Times New Roman typeface. A screen shot of the Appellant’s document is included. (Exhibit A). Even so, if there were a violation it would be harmless as Rule 2.2(B) allows a brief in non-compliance with App.R 19 to be returned to the court for reformation.
It would be prejudicial to the Appellant if this court were to accept Appellee’s 25 page brief. The accelerated calendar does not allow for the filing of reply briefs, so the Appellant would be at a significant disadvantage. The brief runs afoul of the rule requiring 15 pages for brevity so that the proceedings maybe expedited.
If the Appellee’s brief weren’t full of frivolous and unmerited arguments, he would not need additional pages. In the first paragraph on page 9 the Appellee states, “…[Crystal] … does not arrange for the children to socialize outside of limited church and therapy sessions, and the children are otherwise not involved in extracurricular activities or other activities.” The second paragraph on page 9 reads, “…there is ample evidence that Crystal was not getting the children proper medical and mental care.” Reversely, on page 10, in the first full paragraph, the brief states, “Additionally, testimony was provided by Ashley and the GAL that Crystal’s unilateral decisions regarding the children’s medical and social events were made to interfere with Ashley’s parenting time and interaction with the children.”
If the children were not receiving medical care or being socialized in the first place, how could the Appellant’s decisions interfere at all with the Appellee’s parenting time? Not only did the Appellee fill the brief with nonsensical arguments, he is stalwart in his opposition to the rules of this court.
The Appellee makes statements of law that are not, in fact, law. In the second sentence of the second paragraph on page 9, the Appellee asserts that it is required by law to vaccinate children. This is not the law in Ohio or Indiana, further the brief is used to argue against Appellant’s constitutional rights regarding her religious convictions. He argues facts of the case that were known to the court prior to the last post motion decree, such as the Appellant’s court approved relocation to Indiana in 2011. Among other things he claims that the Appellant was reading from the Separation Agreement when in fact, as indicated by the transcript (TR., p. 423, ln 25), she was reading from the State Standard Order. (Third full paragraph, p. 18 of Appellee Brief). The brief indicates that the Appellant stated in trial that the Appellee was not responsible for extracurricular charges per the statement read in court. The counsel for the Appellee had the Appellant read from the State Standard Order and not the Separation Agreement, which states in Article IV
Submitted: 1 year ago.Category: Family Law
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own Family Law Question
Customer reply replied 1 year ago
8220;Husband and Wife shall each pay one-half (1/2) of all costs associated with the children participating in any school-related or extra-curricular activity, including but not limited to, the costs of lessons, instruments, equipment and uniforms.”Appellee appears to be stalling the proceedings by falsely accusing the Appellant of other rules violations, and submitting a non-conforming brief that egregiously violates the court’s rules. Thus, necessitating this reply and as a result, this case cannot proceed until this issue is resolved, all to the prejudice of the Appellant.
Answered in 4 minutes by:
9/14/2016
Family Lawyer: P. Simmons, Lawyer replied 1 year ago
P. Simmons
P. Simmons, Lawyer
Category: Family Law
Satisfied Customers: 35,283
Experience: 16 yrs. of experience including family law.
Verified

Hi, My name is***** am an attorney with over 16 years experience. Hopefully I can help you with your legal question.

Ask Your Own Family Law Question
Family Lawyer: P. Simmons, Lawyer replied 1 year ago

I will send the offer for additional services...if you accept happy to provide both a "proof read" as well as thoughts

Ask Your Own Family Law Question
Customer reply replied 1 year ago
No thanks, ***** ***** for the premium subscription service already. No offense. I've just spent over $10K on this case already and I just don't have the extra money, not that I don't believe advice or help is worth it. Thank you for your time.
Family Lawyer: P. Simmons, Lawyer replied 1 year ago

I wish you the best...

Ask Your Own Family Law Question
Ask Ely Your Own Question
Ely
Ely
Ely, Counselor at Law
Category: Family Law
Satisfied Customers: 11,857
11,857 Satisfied Customers
Experience: Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.

Ely is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Not only did he answer my Michigan divorce question but was also able to help me out with it, too. I have since won my legal case on this matter and thank you so much for it.

LeeMichigan

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Ely

Ely

Counselor at Law

11,857 satisfied customers

Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.

LawTalk

LawTalk

Attorney and Counselor at Law

9,025 satisfied customers

30 years legal experience. I remain current in Family Law through regular continuing education.

Dimitry K., Esq.

Dimitry K., Esq.

Attorney

7,856 satisfied customers

I provide family and divorce law advice to my clients in my firm.

Tina

Tina

Lawyer

6,562 satisfied customers

JD, 17 years legal experience including family law

P. Simmons

P. Simmons

Lawyer

35,283 satisfied customers

16 yrs. of experience including family law.

Barrister

Barrister

Lawyer

3,346 satisfied customers

Attorney with 17 years experience

RobertJDFL

RobertJDFL

Lawyer

2,754 satisfied customers

Experienced in multiple areas of the law.

< Previous | Next >

Related Family Law Questions
I am a Pro Se defendant in a divorce case. We were married
I am a Pro Se defendant in a divorce case. We were married 32 years. We have three adult children 29, 28, 22. I go before the judge on Friday for a pendante lite motion. During the marriage, the past … read more
Phillips Esq.
Phillips Esq.
Attorney
Juris Doctor
17,996 satisfied customers
I'm trying to find the pro se form for a petition to
I'm trying to find the pro se form for a petition to domesticate a foreign judgment from Florida to Georgia … read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
I am in Pro Se status and have been filing motions with the
I am in Pro Se status and have been filing motions with the court. Opposing counsel just contacted me saying she has filed a notice of absence from this week and that I should not contact her anymore.… read more
INFOLAWYER
INFOLAWYER
Partner
Doctoral Degree
55,486 satisfied customers
I am currently in Pro Se status. I have read that opposing
I am currently in Pro Se status. I have read that opposing counsel must be careful not to give legal advice to me while in this status. What avenue can I take if she does give me legal advice? As in, … read more
Dwayne B.
Dwayne B.
Juris Doctor
28,500 satisfied customers
I am currently Pro Se in a family law/custody case. I would
I am currently Pro Se in a family law/custody case. I would like to know what kind of motions I'm allowed to file. We had a temporary custody plan hearing in September and have our final hearing in De… read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
30,259 satisfied customers
I am plaintiff pro se. Do Admissions (for Discovery) have to
I am plaintiff pro se. Do Admissions (for Discovery) have to be notarized after they are completed? Does having the defendant have to notarize the Admissions? Does notarizing them add legitimacy to an… read more
RobertJDFL
RobertJDFL
Lawyer
Juris Doctorate
2,754 satisfied customers
A defendant, in a case I am the pro se plaintiff, answered
A defendant, in a case I am the pro se plaintiff, answered my Admissions by Admitting what I need to prove. She is only one of many defendants, but her Admission is the most significant since it invol… read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
30,259 satisfied customers
I'm a pro se in a divorce and we are coming to formal
I'm a pro se in a divorce and we are coming to formal discovery phase. My husband's attorney filed her timesheet a few months back and in it, it mentions that she billed my husband for drafting an aff… read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
30,259 satisfied customers
My pending (petitioner's pro se) motion is underway re
my pending (petitioner's pro se) motion is underway re Verified Motion to Modify Child Support; my employment income circumstances are fluid as a result of current employment disability absence of unc… read more
lucy7368
lucy7368
Juris Doctor
763 satisfied customers
I am trying to complete a pro se divorce in Kerr CCAL for a
I am trying to complete a pro se divorce in Kerr CCAL for a TDCJ inmate. The judge refuses to hear it or even issue any type of ruling.Ms. Griffith is currently incarcerated in TDCJ Hobby Unit in Marl… read more
Michael Bradley
Michael Bradley
JD
1,131 satisfied customers
Am pro se father re Colorado Child Support Modification
Am pro se father re Colorado Child Support Modification petition re emancipation 9-25-17, oldest of two daughters. Ex/former spouse still represented by same counsel from divorce process 8yrs+. Now wi… read more
lucy7368
lucy7368
Juris Doctor
763 satisfied customers
Im pro se. My ex has an attorney. She is adamant that she
Im pro se. My ex has an attorney. She is adamant that she will not follow the temporary visitation order that is in place. Im trying to reason with her but she keeps telling me to call her lawyer. Sho… read more
Zoey, JD
Zoey, JD
Doctoral Degree
175 satisfied customers
I won a case on appeal pro se and the case was remanded to
I won a case on appeal pro se and the case was remanded to the lower court for rehearing pending a motion. I made said motion and included a final court order. I also won court fees and included that … read more
socrateaser
socrateaser
1,031 satisfied customers
Woman represented herself (pro se) at trial & lost. Lawyer
Woman represented herself (pro se) at trial & lost. Lawyer filed a motion for new trial which was denied. Woman wanted lawyer to appeal trial ruling. Lawyer reminded her he was only going to help her … read more
lucy7368
lucy7368
Juris Doctor
763 satisfied customers
I had court today and represented myself pro se...i was
I had court today and represented myself pro se...i was completely unaware of this hearing and was not made aware of the date. However, i can to court, albeit, late. The judge asked me did i want to p… read more
Phillips Esq.
Phillips Esq.
Attorney
Juris Doctor
17,996 satisfied customers
On March 30, 2017, Woman (pro se) lost custody of her two
On March 30, 2017, Woman (pro se) lost custody of her two children 15 and 11 year olds. I filed a MNT for her it was denied. To avoid the expense of an appeal. I'm considering filing a motion to modif… read more
originallawyer
originallawyer
Attorney at Law
Doctoral Degree
879 satisfied customers
I am in the middle of a divorce proceeding as a Pro Se and
I am in the middle of a divorce proceeding as a Pro Se and the opposing counsel make these statement occasionally, which indicate she is more informed on me than I am.I don't know how the opposing cou… read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
30,259 satisfied customers
If I am representing myself pro se, and requested an in
If I am representing myself pro se, and requested an in camera interview for my child, will I be allowed with my ex's attorney to ask questions or since it's a conflict for a parent to be in there, wo… read more
INFOLAWYER
INFOLAWYER
Partner
Doctoral Degree
55,486 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x