How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Christopher B, Esq. Your Own Question
Christopher B, Esq.
Christopher B, Esq., Lawyer
Category: Family Law
Satisfied Customers: 2982
Experience:  associate attorney
Type Your Family Law Question Here...
Christopher B, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I was married almost 30 years to a man that regularly abused

Customer Question

I was married almost 30 years to a man that regularly abused me in every way. I have PTSD because of it. My husband started dating a 25 year old Peruvian immigrant the same age as one of our 4 children. I had a breakdown and we divorced (around 2000) as he would not give her up. He hid a legal settlement and the true value of his retirement and maybe more. But what hurts me the most is that I did not pursue any percentage of the business earnings. I helped him with this business regularly. And he never had to do a single thing for our 4 children and home. I did it ALL. I enabled him to run the business and took wonderful care of him.
I am destitute and sick. He is now rich with 3 homes, cars including Porsche, constant travel, etc etc etc. I was a vegetable at the time and would have signed anything. He had a shrewd lawyer and I was naive. Is there any way for me to obtain even a small percent of this? Thank you so much.
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Family Law
Customer: replied 1 year ago.
Because of depression, I remarried, therefore losing my small alimony.
The man lived a dangerous double life and I had to divorce.
I had written in about this previously.
Expert:  Christopher B, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
My name is***** and I will be helping you with your question today. This is for informational purposes only and does not establish an attorney client relationship. Unfortunately once a final settlement order is signed by the Judge, there is not much you can do unless you can prove that your ex did in fact hide assets during the property settlement. Hiding assets from a spouse during a divorce is illegal. New Jersey family law provides that married people have a legal relationship known as a fiduciary duty from the from the time they get married until at least the moment when they are finally divorced. This duty is the highest standard of trust and confidence that is recognized by New Jersey family law. This fiduciary duty continues through the period of marital separation and, in many cases, until your property is finally equitably distributed. If you ex is caught hiding assets, then a court can order him to pay the legal fees and expenses that you incur in litigating the issue. He also can be forced to forfeit the entire disputed asset as a penalty for lying. Rule 4:50-1 provides that upon motion with briefs the court may relieve a party from a final judgment or order on the grounds of fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party. This rule may be used as grounds to set aside a final judgment of divorce, which incorporates a settlement agreement. Any relief provided under Rule 4:50-1 for any reason rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, and is controlled by case law and by long established equitable principles. However, the legal standard imposed by the courts imposes a difficult burden on the moving party to set aside a settlement. In the case of Wiengarten v. Wiengarten, 234 N.J. Super. 318 (1989), the Appellate Division set forth the elements that are required to be proven to set aside a matrimonial settlement agreement. The court held:In order to obtain judicial relief here she will have to prove that his fraudulent conduct in failing to disclose the true value of the assets was the basis of her decision to accept an agreement which was not fair and equitable…. She also will have to show that she was not otherwise aware of the husband’s undervaluation of the assets or that she would have been likely to secure such information but for the husband’s actions…. Likewise, a crucial inquiry might be whether the wife was aware of the husband’s alleged fraudulent conduct at the time she signed the agreement, and communications with her attorney bearing on that issue are certainly relevant to this inquiry. For example, she may have indicated to Diamond that, although she was aware of the potential value of the estate, she had settled because of a desire to amicably resolve their dispute as quickly as possible. Thus, to the extent the attorney’s testimony is necessary to the husband’s defense and is relevant to the issues raised by the wife’s application, if the information sought is not available from another source, the attorney client privilege should be deemed to have been waived… Id. at 327-28.In simpler terms, the legal test under Rule 4:50, requires that the movant establish the following: 1) The fraudulent conduct was the basis of the party’s decision to accept an agreement that was not fair and equitable; and, 2) the party seeking relief could not have otherwise discovered the deception because of the fraudulent behavior. This is a very heavy burden. Therefore, your legal paperwork must be top notch if you expect to obtain any decent results. Please let me know if you have any further questions and please positively rate my answer if satisfied. There should be smiley faces or numbers from 1-5 to choose from. This extra step will cost you nothing extra and will ensure that I will be compensated for my time by the site.
Expert:  Christopher B, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
Just checking back in, do you have any further questions?

Related Family Law Questions