How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Mr. Gregory White Your Own Question
Mr. Gregory White
Mr. Gregory White, Master's Degree
Category: Essays
Satisfied Customers: 500
Experience:  M.A., M.S. Education / Educational Administration
Type Your Essays Question Here...
Mr. Gregory White is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Questions in this section, 2-3 paragraphs should be

Customer Question

For the questions in this section, 2-3 paragraphs should be needed unless indicated otherwise. The following was provided in the TRS Deal Memo (under “Transaction Documents” on BlackBoard) and is used for the questions contained in this part: • Analux would like to have an upper Cap (upper limit) on the indemnification obligation that Analux would have for a breach of the title representation in Section 6.6 of the APA as it would relate to IP assets that are purchased by TRS under the APA. In other words, Analux wants to have an upper Cap to any liability they may have to us if they do not have good and valid title to any of the sold IP assets. • Analux has said that our refusal to add the Cap does not comport with their understanding of the deal. The basis for their position is that the letter of intent between the parties said that usual and customary representations and indemnities would apply to the APA, and as evidenced by the following study, TRS’s attempt to remove the IP title rep from the Cap does not comport with usual and customary representations that one would see in an APA: o A 2007 Private Target Study (conducted by an ABA subcommittee) stated that upper Caps for asset title representations were given to the Seller in 90% of the purchase agreements examined in the Study. 22. What can we argue to the other side that the upper Cap for the title representation (as it relates to IP assets) is not appropriate in our situation? 23. Can this be structured as or considered a “Win-Win” situation for both parties? Why or why not?

Submitted: 2 years ago.
Category: Essays
Expert:  Mr. Gregory White replied 2 years ago.
Hello, my name is ***** ***** seeking resources to use as you prepare your own final response or for a newly written model? Is there any additional information (rubrics, files, etc) that you can provide (if a file, you can upload using a file sharing site, such as, and then share the link here).
Customer: replied 2 years ago. - Deal Memo.doc

It's the deal memo

Expert:  Mr. Gregory White replied 2 years ago.
After going through my resources, I do not have what is necessary to complete at this time.I am opting out and opening up to the other professionals and messaging a couple who might be able to help. Someone should be with you shortly.

Related Essays Questions