How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Allen M., Esq. Your Own Question
Allen M., Esq.
Allen M., Esq., Employment Lawyer
Category: Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 19176
Experience:  Employment/Labor Law Litigation
Type Your Employment Law Question Here...
Allen M., Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

My husband, works and he was suspended outside and may be

Customer Question

My husband, Chris works for Costco and he was suspended for urinating outside and may be terminated on Monday. He has diabetes and needs to go to the bathroom frequently. The bathroom is outside the Oregon labor code and too far from the gas station but many feet. On several occasions he has been working alone and called for back up to go to the bathroom but no one showed up. In addition, another gas station employee was written up and not fired. Chris is a cancer survivor and is currently on FMLA for stress and depression related to brain radiation. Can he legally be terminated?
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Employment Law
Expert:  Allen M., Esq. replied 1 year ago.

He can be terminated on the basis that the urination outside was an "intervening cause" for his termination.

Being on FMLA doesn't insulate one from termination for offenses not actually related to FMLA absences. Certainly, there is an issue with the bathroom not being where it should be, but that is just a basis for a complaint to the DOL against the employer for not complying with the rule. That is not a basis for allowing a person to engage in what could be classified as misconduct.

So, the only way that your husband could argue that the employer here is engaged in discrimination is if he can show some evidence demonstrating that other people have committed more serious "offenses" and were not terminated. Then it will appear that the employer is intentionally overreacting due to his disability or because he was using FMLA.

He would make that argument to the EEOC (and the DOL for FMLA use discrimination).

So, they can terminate him and hold the position that it was an "intervening cause" that would justify the termination, and he can then file the complaints with the EEOC and DOL. Regrettably, this is a really close call and it will depend greatly on what other offenses can be pointed to where they chose to keep the employee.

Related Employment Law Questions