How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Delta-Lawyer Your Own Question
Delta-Lawyer, Lawyer
Category: Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 3546
Experience:  In-House Counsel & Litigator
Type Your Employment Law Question Here...
Delta-Lawyer is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I was hired by a sporting goods company to show them how to

This answer was rated:

I was hired by a sporting goods company to show them how to make a certain type of uniform that they currently did not make on their own. I have been there 5 years and in that time have been through 4 different layoffs and saw the company shrink from 200 employees to 30. Recently I helped them move 95% of their production overseas and trained the staff there to run the equipment and do our jobs, I hate that I did it but I had to keep my job. I feel this place will close in the next 6 months, but they will not tell us that. I have a job offer from a company that could be considered a competitor in another state, to come in and basically show them how to make a similar uniform to what I originally showed my current employer how to do. I have an NCA with my current employer, but feel if I wait to be laid off this opportunity will be gone. I did not learn this process from my current employer, I showed them how to do it. It's also nothing that can't be learned online, everyone that does this uses the same process. Should I worry about the NCA?

I hope this message finds you well, present circumstances excluded. NCA are enforceable as long as they are reasonable. They must be for reasonable amounts of time and within reasonable geographic limitations. Moreover, increasingly, it appears that when an individual is in a situation such as the one you are in wherein the business is on the verge of collapse, courts are unwilling to enforce the provisions of a non-compete as strictly.


Since you are not carrying with you proprietary information that is protected under intellectual property laws (I assume there is no patent or copyright on the design or process), then you should be fine in accepting the job and moving, even in view of the non-compete.


The fact that you are moving from the state certainly helps your cause.


While more of a personal decision than legal, you may want to let the new employer know about the NCA so they are not caught off guard if by some chance the current employer tries to make a stink about the issue. The reason I say this is a personal decision is that you know the people and how they would react. If they want your services, they will not be overly concerned about the NCA as it is likely unenforceable anyway.


To that point, if the current employer is struggling so bad right now, it is unlikely they are going to want to expend the legal fees to fight out the NCA anyway. More times than not, the NCA is a bluff.


In summary, based on the information you have provided, it is very likely that you will be perfectly fine taking the new job. NCA are enforceable based on reasonableness. Reasonableness takes into account geographic area and time. Since you are moving to another state and since the current employer is struggling, the law would indicate you will be fine.


Let me know if you have any additional questions or comments.


Best wishes going forward.

Customer: replied 3 years ago.


Here is a copy of the NCA clause, just in case. I don't think it would change anything, to me it's kind of vague. Especially since they never even signed it... Hopefully your answer stays pretty much the same after reading it.

NCA Clause

Dan, that does not change anything. It is too vague, too broad, places no limitations on geography and only last for one year. Moreover, the fact that it only restricts, in essence, knowledge acquired on the job, bolsters your case even more. You had this knowledge and taught it to was not acquired as a result of access to their R&D. The fact that they did not sign it is somewhat ancillary to the fact but certainly a feather in your cap and an additional argument to be made if it came down to it as well.


You should be in the clear based on the language of that document and predicated on what you have told me.


Let me know if you need anything else.

Delta-Lawyer and 2 other Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you

Related Employment Law Questions