Criminal Law

Criminal Law Questions? Ask a Criminal Lawyer.

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

This answer was rated:

Is it possible for a federal prosecutor to introduce a [law…

Is it possible for a...
Is it possible for a federal prosecutor to introduce a [law enforcement agent] witness for testimony on allegations [modus operandi] of unrelated business activities that are not associated with a conviction or pending civil or criminal legal action against a defendant? NOTE: The criminal charges against the defendant occurred six years before the events that the government witness' statements about the defendant. [Again] No civil or criminal action has been taken against the defendant regarding the government witness' testimony about the defendant's political ties or involvement that occurred years after the alleged criminal acts [totally unrelated to the witness' current claims]. This appears to be running two trials at once for entirely different issues. Is this legal or ethical; is there a way [legal application] to dismiss such attempts by a prosecutor?
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own Criminal Law Question
Answered in 1 day by:
3/8/2018
RayAnswers
RayAnswers, Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 48,137
Experience: licensed attorney in criminjal law for 30 years
Verified

Hi and welcome to JA. Ray here to help you today.Please bear with me a few moments while I review your question and respond.

Ask Your Own Criminal Law Question

You would have running objection that it is irrelevant to the current proceeding.Make sure the record is clear that you made such objection and that the objection if over ruled is duly noted in the record.

It is critical that you make such duly noted objections, you may want to follow up during the testimony if allowed that your running objection is duly noted.If the judge allows this you may have great grounds for appeal .

I appreciate the chance to help you today.Thanks and good luck

If you can positive rate 5 stars it is much appreciated.

RayAnswers
RayAnswers, Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 48,137
Experience: licensed attorney in criminjal law for 30 years
Verified
RayAnswers and 87 other Criminal Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now

Rule 401. Test for Relevant Evidence

Evidence is relevant if:

(a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and

(b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action.

Notes

(Pub. L. 93–595, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1931; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.)

Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules

Problems of relevancy call for an answer to the question whether an item of evidence, when tested by the processes of legal reasoning, possesses sufficient probative value to justify receiving it in evidence. Thus, assessment of the probative value of evidence that a person purchased a revolver shortly prior to a fatal shooting with which he is charged is a matter of analysis and reasoning.

The variety of relevancy problems is coextensive with the ingenuity of counsel in using circumstantial evidence as a means of proof. An enormous number of cases fall in no set pattern, and this rule is designed as a guide for handling them. On the other hand, some situations recur with sufficient frequency to create patterns susceptible of treatment by specific rules. Rule 404 and those following it are of that variety; they also serve as illustrations of the application of the present rule as limited by the exclusionary principles of Rule 403.

Passing mention should be made of so-called “conditional” relevancy. Morgan, Basic Problems of Evidence 45–46 (1962). In this situation, probative value depends not only upon satisfying the basic requirement of relevancy as described above but also upon the existence of some matter of fact. For example, if evidence of a spoken statement is relied upon to prove notice, probative value is lacking unless the person sought to be charged heard the statement. The problem is one of fact, and the only rules needed are for the purpose of determining the respective functions of judge and jury. See Rules 104(b) and 901. The discussion which follows in the present note is concerned with relevancy generally, not with any particular problem of conditional relevancy.

Relevancy is not an inherent characteristic of any item of evidence but exists only as a relation between an item of evidence and a matter properly provable in the case. Does the item of evidence tend to prove the matter sought to be proved? Whether the relationship exists depends upon principles evolved by experience or science, applied logically to the situation at hand. James, Relevancy, Probability and the Law, 29 Calif.L.Rev. 689, 696, n. 15 (1941), in Selected Writings on Evidence and Trial 610, 615, n. 15 (Fryer ed. 1957). The rule summarizes this relationship as a “tendency to make the existence” of the fact to be proved “more probable or less probable.” Compare Uniform Rule 1(2) which states the crux of relevancy as “a tendency in reason,” thus perhaps emphasizing unduly the logical process and ignoring the need to draw upon experience or science to validate the general principle upon which relevancy in a particular situation depends.

The standard of probability under the rule is “more * * * probable than it would be without the evidence.” Any more stringent requirement is unworkable and unrealistic. As McCormick §152, p. 317, says, “A brick is not a wall,” or, as Falknor, Extrinsic Policies Affecting Admissibility, 10 Rutgers L.Rev. 574, 576 (1956), quotes Professor McBaine, “* * * t is not to be supposed that every witness can make a home run.” Dealing with probability in the language of the rule has the added virtue of avoiding confusion between questions of admissibility and questions of the sufficiency of the evidence.

The rule uses the phrase “fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action” to describe the kind of fact to which proof may properly be directed. The language is that of California Evidence Code §210; it has the advantage of avoiding the loosely used and ambiguous word “material.” Tentative Recommendation and a Study Relating to the Uniform Rules of Evidence (Art. I. General Provisions), Cal. Law Revision Comm'n, Rep., Rec. & Studies, 10–11 (1964). The fact to be proved may be ultimate, intermediate, or evidentiary; it matters not, so long as it is of consequence in the determination of the action. Cf. Uniform Rule 1(2) which requires that the evidence relate to a “material” fact.

The fact to which the evidence is directed need not be in dispute. While situations will arise which call for the exclusion of evidence offered to prove a point conceded by the opponent, the ruling should be made on the basis of such considerations as waste of time and undue prejudice (see Rule 403), rather than under any general requirement that evidence is admissible only if directed to matters in dispute. Evidence which is essentially background in nature can scarcely be said to involve disputed matter, yet it is universally offered and admitted as an aid to understanding. Charts, photographs, views of real estate, murder weapons, and many other items of evidence fall in this category. A rule limiting admissibility to evidence directed to a controversial point would invite the exclusion of this helpful evidence, or at least the raising of endless questions over its admission. Cf. California Evidence Code §210, defining relevant evidence in terms of tendency to prove a disputed fact.

Committee Notes on Rules—2011 Amendment

The language of Rule 401 has been amended as part of the restyling of the Evidence Rules to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. These changes are intended to be stylistic only. There is no intent to change any result in any ruling on evidence admissibility.

Ask Your Own Criminal Law Question

Rule 403. Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons

The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.

These may be other objections you can raise under the federal rules of evidence.

Ask Your Own Criminal Law Question
Was this answer helpful?

How JustAnswer works

step-image
Describe your issueThe assistant will guide you
step-image
Chat 1:1 with a criminal lawyerLicensed Experts are available 24/7
step-image
100% satisfaction guaranteeGet all the answers you need
Ask RayAnswers Your Own Question
RayAnswers
RayAnswers
RayAnswers, Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 48,137
48,137 Satisfied Customers
Experience: licensed attorney in criminjal law for 30 years

RayAnswers is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Your Expert advise has provided insight on a difficult situation. Thank you so much for the prompt response. I will definitely recommend your website to my friends.

NormaPensacola, FL

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Ely

Ely

Counselor at Law

3,248 satisfied customers

Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.

P. Simmons

P. Simmons

Lawyer

2,153 satisfied customers

16 yrs. of experience including criminal law.

RobertJDFL

RobertJDFL

Lawyer

1,984 satisfied customers

Experienced in multiple areas of the law.

LawTalk

LawTalk

Lawyer

1,815 satisfied customers

30 years legal experience

Nate

Nate

Lawyer

1,750 satisfied customers

Over 10 years of criminal defense practice.

Marsha411JD

Marsha411JD

Lawyer

1,638 satisfied customers

Licensed attorney with 29 yrs. exp. in criminal law

Barrister

Barrister

Criminal Defense Law

1,255 satisfied customers

17 years practicing criminal defense.

< Previous | Next >

Related Criminal Law Questions
Q: Is this a form of entrapment or something else, and what
Q: Is this a form of entrapment or something else, and what can be done about it?A pretrial service officer and the court force a defendant to live in a known drug house under a bail/release order, af… read more
Jonathan Holson
Jonathan Holson
JD
113 satisfied customers
There is a case pending in Criminal Court (for assault and
There is a case pending in Criminal Court (for assault and robbery) against my ex-boyfriend. But also I sued him in Family Court (I've just won and got 2 year old permanent order of protection). The c… read more
Nisha Jones
Nisha Jones
Juris Doctorate
3,323 satisfied customers
Can a third party file an "Answer" to the court during a
Can a third party file an "Answer" to the court during a pending jury trial (i.e., an investigative news reporter who has inculpatory or exculpatory evidence on the defendant)? If so, how do they go a… read more
James Daloisio
James Daloisio
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
444 satisfied customers
A law enforcement agent files a criminal complaint against a
A law enforcement agent files a criminal complaint against a suspect to get an arrest warrant issued.In the complaint, the agent states that he has not included every fact known to him concerning the … read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
What elements are needed to prove prosecutorial misconduct?
What elements are needed to prove prosecutorial misconduct?What is the proper legal application to be filed to obtain a pretrial dismissal based on the proof of various acts of misconduct by the prose… read more
DanLegal
DanLegal
Law Partner
Juris Doctor
576 satisfied customers
Q: Is it legal for a prosecutor to hold two trials in one
Q: Is it legal for a prosecutor to hold two trials in one for unrelated allegations?Can a defendant criminally charged for "Allegation-A" related to "Legal Issue A" by an AUSA, who is one of six AUSAs… read more
Olivia Kent
Olivia Kent
Managing Partner
Doctoral Degree
3,923 satisfied customers
Q: Government witness with unconfirmed allegations for
Q: Government witness with unconfirmed allegations for matters unrelated to charges of a case[?]Is it possible for a federal prosecutor to introduce a [law enforcement agent] witness for testimony on … read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
Q: Selective Prosecution or Prosecutorial Misconduct? Is it
Q: Selective Prosecution or Prosecutorial Misconduct?Is it considered selective prosecution or prosecutorial misconduct if the fed prosecutor discusses a defendant's work as a political activist for a… read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
If a federal prosecutor mentions a political figure's role
If a federal prosecutor mentions a political figure's role as a supporter and special interest group leader for a specific presidential candidate in the midst of election year during grand jury procee… read more
P. Simmons
P. Simmons
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
2,153 satisfied customers
If a federal grand jury gets a criminal reaches a verdict of
If a federal grand jury gets a criminal reaches a verdict of guilty to get an indictment against a defendant accused of wrongful doing {e.g.; violation of false claims act) as "CEO of a company" and b… read more
Zoey, JD
Zoey, JD
Doctoral Degree
194 satisfied customers
allegedly I called my ex several times after I was served with
allegedly I called my ex several times after I was served with a top. before I hired my private attorney she tol me she had a private investigator that could get the phone records to see for sure if I… read more
Law Pro
Law Pro
Doctoral Degree
19,000 satisfied customers
What is it called when a defense lawyer sabotages a case, and
What is it called when a defense lawyer sabotages a case, and what can be done about it? Official witness testimony in which the victim recanted earlier accusations is now missing from the from the 'c… read more
Roger
Roger
Litigation Attorney
Doctoral Degree
26,935 satisfied customers
To: Lwpat: Did you get my question about the Miss-Dated charges...?
To: Lwpat: Did you get my question about the Miss-Dated charges...? If yoy prefer that I get another Expert, please let me know that? I realize I have lots of questions.… read more
lwpat
lwpat
Doctoral Degree
256 satisfied customers
in a criminal case does the prosecution have to reveal ALL
in a criminal case does the prosecution have to reveal ALL of the evidence in their possesssion at the time of the pre~trial hearing or can they wiithhold some part of it? If they should do this, can … read more
xavierjd
xavierjd
Juris Doctor
3,361 satisfied customers
prosecutor introduced evidence in the case which was not shared
prosecutor introduced evidence in the case which was not shared with the defense counsel. Second interview of prosecution witness (also defense witness) was made six days ago and the notes were into s… read more
Zoey, JD
Zoey, JD
Doctoral Degree
194 satisfied customers
Picture a situation where there is a civil contempt of court
Picture a situation where there is a civil contempt of court "Show Cause" hearing in Maryland for violating a "stay away" condition of a peace order" and a related criminal hearing to follow. During t… read more
ProsecutorEC
ProsecutorEC
Doctoral Degree
71 satisfied customers
Two Questions 1. Can a small business recoupe legal fees
Two Questions: 1. Can a small business recoupe legal fees against the federal government if they are found not guilty of a rediculous felony charge? 2. What constitutes prosecutor misconduct?… read more
Law Pro
Law Pro
Doctoral Degree
19,000 satisfied customers
My brother and 3 other young men are on trial for open murder
My brother and 3 other young men are on trial for open murder the prosecutor has coerced witnesses and they have been lying and at least two witnesses have disputed their statements they have been inc… read more
xavierjd
xavierjd
Juris Doctor
3,361 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x