Criminal Law

Criminal Law Questions? Ask a Criminal Lawyer.

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

This answer was rated:

Is it possible for a federal prosecutor to introduce a [law…

Is it possible for a...
Is it possible for a federal prosecutor to introduce a [law enforcement agent] witness for testimony on allegations [modus operandi] of unrelated business activities that are not associated with a conviction or pending civil or criminal legal action against a defendant? NOTE: The criminal charges against the defendant occurred six years before the events that the government witness' statements about the defendant. [Again] No civil or criminal action has been taken against the defendant regarding the government witness' testimony about the defendant's political ties or involvement that occurred years after the alleged criminal acts [totally unrelated to the witness' current claims]. This appears to be running two trials at once for entirely different issues. Is this legal or ethical; is there a way [legal application] to dismiss such attempts by a prosecutor?
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own Criminal Law Question
Answered in 1 day by:
3/8/2018
RayAnswers
RayAnswers, Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 46,311
Experience: licensed attorney in criminjal law for 30 years
Verified

Hi and welcome to JA. Ray here to help you today.Please bear with me a few moments while I review your question and respond.

Ask Your Own Criminal Law Question

You would have running objection that it is irrelevant to the current proceeding.Make sure the record is clear that you made such objection and that the objection if over ruled is duly noted in the record.

It is critical that you make such duly noted objections, you may want to follow up during the testimony if allowed that your running objection is duly noted.If the judge allows this you may have great grounds for appeal .

I appreciate the chance to help you today.Thanks and good luck

If you can positive rate 5 stars it is much appreciated.

RayAnswers
RayAnswers, Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 46,311
Experience: licensed attorney in criminjal law for 30 years
Verified
RayAnswers and 87 other Criminal Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now

Rule 401. Test for Relevant Evidence

Evidence is relevant if:

(a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and

(b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action.

Notes

(Pub. L. 93–595, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1931; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.)

Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules

Problems of relevancy call for an answer to the question whether an item of evidence, when tested by the processes of legal reasoning, possesses sufficient probative value to justify receiving it in evidence. Thus, assessment of the probative value of evidence that a person purchased a revolver shortly prior to a fatal shooting with which he is charged is a matter of analysis and reasoning.

The variety of relevancy problems is coextensive with the ingenuity of counsel in using circumstantial evidence as a means of proof. An enormous number of cases fall in no set pattern, and this rule is designed as a guide for handling them. On the other hand, some situations recur with sufficient frequency to create patterns susceptible of treatment by specific rules. Rule 404 and those following it are of that variety; they also serve as illustrations of the application of the present rule as limited by the exclusionary principles of Rule 403.

Passing mention should be made of so-called “conditional” relevancy. Morgan, Basic Problems of Evidence 45–46 (1962). In this situation, probative value depends not only upon satisfying the basic requirement of relevancy as described above but also upon the existence of some matter of fact. For example, if evidence of a spoken statement is relied upon to prove notice, probative value is lacking unless the person sought to be charged heard the statement. The problem is one of fact, and the only rules needed are for the purpose of determining the respective functions of judge and jury. See Rules 104(b) and 901. The discussion which follows in the present note is concerned with relevancy generally, not with any particular problem of conditional relevancy.

Relevancy is not an inherent characteristic of any item of evidence but exists only as a relation between an item of evidence and a matter properly provable in the case. Does the item of evidence tend to prove the matter sought to be proved? Whether the relationship exists depends upon principles evolved by experience or science, applied logically to the situation at hand. James, Relevancy, Probability and the Law, 29 Calif.L.Rev. 689, 696, n. 15 (1941), in Selected Writings on Evidence and Trial 610, 615, n. 15 (Fryer ed. 1957). The rule summarizes this relationship as a “tendency to make the existence” of the fact to be proved “more probable or less probable.” Compare Uniform Rule 1(2) which states the crux of relevancy as “a tendency in reason,” thus perhaps emphasizing unduly the logical process and ignoring the need to draw upon experience or science to validate the general principle upon which relevancy in a particular situation depends.

The standard of probability under the rule is “more * * * probable than it would be without the evidence.” Any more stringent requirement is unworkable and unrealistic. As McCormick §152, p. 317, says, “A brick is not a wall,” or, as Falknor, Extrinsic Policies Affecting Admissibility, 10 Rutgers L.Rev. 574, 576 (1956), quotes Professor McBaine, “* * * t is not to be supposed that every witness can make a home run.” Dealing with probability in the language of the rule has the added virtue of avoiding confusion between questions of admissibility and questions of the sufficiency of the evidence.

The rule uses the phrase “fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action” to describe the kind of fact to which proof may properly be directed. The language is that of California Evidence Code §210; it has the advantage of avoiding the loosely used and ambiguous word “material.” Tentative Recommendation and a Study Relating to the Uniform Rules of Evidence (Art. I. General Provisions), Cal. Law Revision Comm'n, Rep., Rec. & Studies, 10–11 (1964). The fact to be proved may be ultimate, intermediate, or evidentiary; it matters not, so long as it is of consequence in the determination of the action. Cf. Uniform Rule 1(2) which requires that the evidence relate to a “material” fact.

The fact to which the evidence is directed need not be in dispute. While situations will arise which call for the exclusion of evidence offered to prove a point conceded by the opponent, the ruling should be made on the basis of such considerations as waste of time and undue prejudice (see Rule 403), rather than under any general requirement that evidence is admissible only if directed to matters in dispute. Evidence which is essentially background in nature can scarcely be said to involve disputed matter, yet it is universally offered and admitted as an aid to understanding. Charts, photographs, views of real estate, murder weapons, and many other items of evidence fall in this category. A rule limiting admissibility to evidence directed to a controversial point would invite the exclusion of this helpful evidence, or at least the raising of endless questions over its admission. Cf. California Evidence Code §210, defining relevant evidence in terms of tendency to prove a disputed fact.

Committee Notes on Rules—2011 Amendment

The language of Rule 401 has been amended as part of the restyling of the Evidence Rules to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. These changes are intended to be stylistic only. There is no intent to change any result in any ruling on evidence admissibility.

Ask Your Own Criminal Law Question

Rule 403. Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons

The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.

These may be other objections you can raise under the federal rules of evidence.

Ask Your Own Criminal Law Question
Was this answer helpful?
Ask RayAnswers Your Own Question
RayAnswers
RayAnswers
RayAnswers, Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 46,311
46,311 Satisfied Customers
Experience: licensed attorney in criminjal law for 30 years

RayAnswers is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Your Expert advise has provided insight on a difficult situation. Thank you so much for the prompt response. I will definitely recommend your website to my friends.

NormaPensacola, FL

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Ely

Ely

Counselor at Law

3,194 satisfied customers

Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.

P. Simmons

P. Simmons

Lawyer

2,063 satisfied customers

16 yrs. of experience including criminal law.

RobertJDFL

RobertJDFL

Lawyer

1,862 satisfied customers

Experienced in multiple areas of the law.

LawTalk

LawTalk

Lawyer

1,815 satisfied customers

30 years legal experience

Nate

Nate

Lawyer

1,736 satisfied customers

Over 10 years of criminal defense practice.

Marsha411JD

Marsha411JD

Lawyer

1,631 satisfied customers

Licensed attorney with 29 yrs. exp. in criminal law

AttorneyTom

AttorneyTom

Lawyer

1,242 satisfied customers

Attorney

< Previous | Next >

Related Criminal Law Questions
What does "Chamber Works" mean for California criminal court?
What does "Chamber Works" mean for California criminal court? It states that "chamber work" was heard on a certain date, time, and department; however, this date was not provided to the defendant in t… read more
Thelawman2
Thelawman2
Doctoral Degree
1,352 satisfied customers
What does the term means, currently under indictment means
What does the term means, currently under indictment means?… read more
TexLawyer
TexLawyer
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
24 satisfied customers
In need of a criminal attorney. Victor is an inmate at
In need of a criminal attorney. Victor Anderson is an inmate at Tarantino County, sentenced to 60 years for robbery. None of the evidence is attached to him. All of his constitutional rights have been… read more
Zoey, JD
Zoey, JD
Doctoral Degree
189 satisfied customers
Situation -- jury trial, they return with a guilty verdict.
Situation -- jury trial, they return with a guilty verdict. Defendant absconds just before sentencing. 16 years later the defendant wants to go back and ask for a re-trial. Is there a possibility or h… read more
Bill Attorney
Bill Attorney
law
2,018 satisfied customers
In a criminal harassment trial (MA 265; 43A), can the
In a criminal harassment trial (MA 265; 43A), can the defense ask the judge to llicit from the jury what their specific findings were? Conviction requires the finding of 3 separate qualifying incident… read more
Zoey, JD
Zoey, JD
Doctoral Degree
189 satisfied customers
If a defendant is indicted and asks for a speedy trial.
If a defendant is indicted and asks for a speedy trial … read more
James Daloisio
James Daloisio
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
156 satisfied customers
I have questions on criminal trial procedures on charges of
I have questions on criminal trial procedures on charges of sexual battery and assault. Will these questions appear online? … read more
Zoey, JD
Zoey, JD
Doctoral Degree
189 satisfied customers
Can a court-appointed criminal attorney [CJA] refuse to
Can a court-appointed criminal attorney [CJA] refuse to admit material evidence related to a case [reverse 404b evidence] and calling (or submitting a motion for witness subpoena) for witnesses of a d… read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
1. can charge in criminal court for theft of services. In
1. Fred can charge Susan in criminal court for theft of services. In addition he can file a lawsuit in civil court to collect money.2. Fred does neither and sells me the money she owes him ( accounts … read more
Expert James
Expert James
Doctoral Degree
11,980 satisfied customers
For a Federal Criminal Lawyer: In a federal criminal case in
In a federal criminal case in the district of Oregon where a motion to suppress had a hearing and an opinion was issued that denied it, several years have gone by and trial has not been held as yet. 1) Is there any situation where a new motion can be filed or the denial challenged prior to the trial when new facts or new case law has been found that could change the opinion? 2) What about if case law or facts existed at the time of the first motion to suppress were not presented or ignored by the court? … read more
lucy7368
lucy7368
Juris Doctor
763 satisfied customers
If a criminal case felony was resolved in court with
if a criminal case felony was resolved in court with probation and closed.. CAn it be repopened' … read more
James Daloisio
James Daloisio
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
156 satisfied customers
Do you assist in a criminal defense of a court action in WV.
Do you assist in a criminal defense of a court action in WV … read more
Michael J, Esq.
Michael J, Esq.
Solo Practicioner
Doctoral Degree
3 satisfied customers
I have a criminal case that will have another court session
Hello, I have a criminal case that will have another court session this upcoming **** … read more
LegalKnowledge
LegalKnowledge
Juris Doctor
29,349 satisfied customers
Sure - my bf lost his criminal trial on Wed and was
Sure - my bf lost his criminal trial on Wed and was convicted of two felony charges. At the end, the judge remanded him to custody for knowing/willful violation of his probation terms (for a civil dvr… read more
LegalKnowledge
LegalKnowledge
Juris Doctor
29,349 satisfied customers
In criminal court, I understand that when an accused has
In criminal court, I understand that when an accused has Clemency from the State Board of X that it can not be held against the accused.So what about in civil court?… read more
RayAnswers
RayAnswers
Lawyer
46,311 satisfied customers
I have a question about procedure in criminal court in
I have a question about procedure in criminal court in Texas; specifically if there is any way to request a pretrial hearing prior to indicment of a felony … read more
RayAnswers
RayAnswers
Lawyer
46,311 satisfied customers
Is it not uncommon for criminal court judges or their
Is it not uncommon for criminal court judges or their court's administration (e.g. bailiffs) to manipulate the only clock on the wall in the courtroom (e.g. set it purposely ahead of or behind the act… read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
I had a criminal court hearing and was sentenced, but was
I had a criminal court hearing and was sentenced, but was never sworn in can this be thrown out… read more
Nisha Jones, Esq.
Nisha Jones, Esq.
Juris Doctorate
2,596 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x