Criminal Law

Criminal Law Questions? Ask a Criminal Lawyer.

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

ARE YOU FINSHED IN ANSWERING MY MOTION QUESTION

Customer Question
ARE YOU FINSHED IN ANSWERING MY MOTION QUESTION
Submitted: 7 months ago.Category: Criminal Law
Ask Your Own Criminal Law Question
Answered in 1 minute by:
12/25/2017
Criminal Lawyer: RayAnswers, Lawyer replied 7 months ago
RayAnswers
RayAnswers, Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 48,882
Experience: licensed attorney in criminjal law for 30 years
Verified

Hi and welcome to JA. Ray here to help you today.Please bear with me a few moments while I review your question and respond.

Ask Your Own Criminal Law Question
Criminal Lawyer: RayAnswers, Lawyer replied 7 months ago

Rule 29(a) Revision or Revocation.

Rule 29(a)(1), Illegal Sentences, provides that, within 60 days after a trial judge imposes a sentence, either the Commonwealth or the judge may move to revise or revoke that sentence if any part of the sentence is illegal. While Rule 29(a) has long authorized a trial judge to increase a sentence under Rule 29(a), either because the sentence imposed is illegal or, on reflection, unjust, see Commonwealth v. Aldoupolis, 386 Mass. 260, 268-270 (1982), former Rule 29 did not authorize the Commonwealth to seek revision or revocation of a sentence for any purpose. See Selavka, 469 Mass. at 506. Rule 29(a)(1) makes it clear that the judge’s authority to correct an illegal sentence remains unchanged, but the rule further permits the Commonwealth to seek such relief. This narrow provision for a Commonwealth motion to revise or revoke a sentence is intentionally limited to correcting an illegal sentence; it does not permit a motion to increase a legal sentence that the prosecutor considers to be legal but unduly lenient.

Rule 29(a)(1)’s authority to challenge an illegal sentence within 60 days of sentencing is limited to the Commonwealth and the trial judge for two reasons. First, the defendant is already authorized to file such a motion. Rule 29(a)(2), Unjust Sentences, leaves unchanged the defendant’s right to challenge a sentence “if it appears that justice may not have been done,” which includes a sentence imposing punishment not permitted by law. See Selavka, 469 Mass. 508 n. 7. Quite apart from Rule 29(a), Rule 30(a) gives the defendant the right to challenge an illegal sentence at any time.

Second, a successful prosecution or judicial motion to revise or revoke an illegal sentence that is too lenient would result in additional punishment, which, if unduly belated, would implicate the defendant’s double-jeopardy interest in sentence finality even though the original sentence was illegal. See Selavka, 469 Mass. at 509. The Court in Selavka concluded that limiting the potential for such upward adjustment of an illegal sentence to Rule 29(a)’s 60-day timeframe marks a reasonable balance between a defendant’s interest in sentence finality and society’s interest in enforcement of the sentencing laws. Selavka, 469 Mass. at 508. Rule 29(a)(1) thus provides for a 60-day time limit for the Commonwealth to file a motion seeking, or for the judge to initiate consideration of, the revision or revocation of an illegal sentence. After that, any motion to revise or revoke an illegal sentence must come from the defendant underRule 30(a), which would raise no double-jeopardy problems.

Rule 29(a)(1) includes revocation as a potential remedy for an illegal sentence that is too lenient, in part because that sentence might have been the result of a guilty plea from which the defendant could have withdrawn had the sentence been more harsh than it was. See Rule 12(c)(4) (permitting defendant to withdraw (1) from a District-Court plea if the judge intends to impose a sentence in excess of defendant’s request and (2) from a Superior-Court plea if the judge intends to sentence in excess of either the agreed recommendation or the prosecutor’s recommendation); Rule 12(d)(4) (requiring a judge who accepts a plea agreement providing for both a charge concession and a specific sentence to impose the agreed sentence and permitting the defendant to withdraw if the judge rejects the plea agreement); former Rule 12(c)(2) (permitting defendant to withdraw (1) from a District-Court plea if the judge intends to impose a sentence in excess of defendant’s request and (2) from a Superior-Court plea if the judge intends to sentence in excess of an agreed recommendation on which the plea was contingent). At the very least, such a case would require re-sentencing, with the defendant presumably having the right to withdraw the plea if Rule 12 would have afforded that right at the plea hearing and initial sentencing. See Selavka, 469 Mass. at 514-515.

Rule 29(a)(2), Unjust Sentences, clarifies former Rule 29(a)’s provision for filing a motion to revise or revoke an unjust sentence following appellate review.

First, the rule makes clear that, other than the imposition of sentence, the only event that triggers the sixty-day period to file a Rule 29(a)(2) motion is the appellate court’s issuance of the rescript in a case on direct review. If the conviction is affirmed, the issuance of the rescript marks the point at which the conviction becomes final, see Foxworth v. St. Amand, 457 Mass. 200, 206 (2010), making it an appropriate time for filing a motion to revise or revoke the sentence based on that conviction. Although on its face the rule does not limit such motions to cases in which the conviction is affirmed, as a practical matter, a conviction’s reversal would result in vacation of the sentence, leaving nothing to revise or revoke.

Pegging the beginning of the sixty-day filing period to the rescript’s issuance permits a defendant whose conviction is affirmed by the Appeals Court to seek either rehearing or further appellate review without impinging on the time period for filing a motion to revise and revoke. Rule of Appellate Procedure 23 requires the Appeals Court, after deciding an appeal and mailing the decision to the parties, to wait twenty-eight days before issuing the rescript, see Mass. R.A.P. 23, thereby affording the parties time to file for rehearing or further review. See Mass. R.A.P. 27 (petition for rehearing to be filed within fourteen days of decision); Mass. R.A.P. 27.1 (application for further review to be filed within twenty days of decision). If either is granted, the rescript’s issuance is stayed pending disposition of that proceeding. See Mass. R.A.P. 23. Finally, the appellate court’s issuance of the rescript, finalizing a conviction which is affirmed, is a procedural event of which the defendant would surely be aware and thus a fair time for the sixty-day filing period to begin. The amendment eliminates the uncertainty caused by basing the time period on the trial court’s receipt of the rescript, which was subject to the vagaries of mail delivery and clerical document processing.

Second, by confining the extension of the sixty-day filing period to cases on direct review, Rule 29(a)(2) clarifies the reach of its predecessor. Former Rule 29(a) did not specify whether a rescript on appellate review of a collateral attack on a sentence would allow a Rule 29 motion, though the Appeals Court found in an unpublished opinion that it would not. Commonwealth v. White, No. 08-P-766, 74 Mass. App. Ct. 1115, 2009 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 788, at *3-*6 (Mass. App. Ct. June 4, 2009). The rule’s purpose is to permit the trial judge to revise or revoke a sentence that, based on the facts existing at the time of sentencing, appears in retrospect to have been unjust. See Commonwealth v. Rodriguez, 461 Mass. 256, 260 (2012); Commonwealth v. DeJesus, 440 Mass. 147, 152 (2003). This purpose is best served if the sentence review prompted by the motion occurs reasonably soon after the sentence’s imposition. See Commonwealth v. Barclay, 424 Mass. 377, 380 (1997) (holding Rule 29 motion must be decided within reasonable time of its filing); Commonwealth v. Layne, 386 Mass. 291, 295-296 (1982) (noting that, with “the passage of time from the date of sentencing, it becomes increasingly difficult for a trial judge to make the determination called for by [then Rule 29(a)] without improperly considering postsentencing events”). Rule 29(a)(2) accordingly limits the filing time to sixty days from the imposition of sentence or from the issuance of the rescript in any direct appeal, the latter filing period commencing as soon as the conviction becomes final. The former rule’s provision permitting filing within sixty days of any appellate court order or judgment “denying review of, or having the effect of upholding, a judgment of conviction” has been deleted as being either redundant (if the order or judgment in question is part of the rescript concluding a direct appeal), or not sufficiently clear.

These are the rules that apply to such a situation to seek to revise or revoke such a sentence.

I appreciate the chance to help you and thanks again.

If you can positive rate 5 stars after we are done it is much appreciated.

Forms for you here

https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2017/09/25/generalpurposemotion%20%281%29.pdf

Ask Your Own Criminal Law Question
Criminal Lawyer: RayAnswers, Lawyer replied 7 months ago

https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2017/09/25/generalpurposemotion%20%281%29.pdf

This is as close as I can come to a premade form.You may have to hand draft off of this one.Thanks again.

Ask Your Own Criminal Law Question
Was this answer helpful?

How JustAnswer works

step-image
Describe your issueThe assistant will guide you
step-image
Chat 1:1 with a criminal lawyerLicensed Experts are available 24/7
step-image
100% satisfaction guaranteeGet all the answers you need
Ask RayAnswers Your Own Question
RayAnswers
RayAnswers
RayAnswers, Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 48,882
48,882 Satisfied Customers
Experience: licensed attorney in criminjal law for 30 years

RayAnswers is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Your Expert advise has provided insight on a difficult situation. Thank you so much for the prompt response. I will definitely recommend your website to my friends.

NormaPensacola, FL

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Ely

Ely

Counselor at Law

3,248 satisfied customers

Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.

P. Simmons

P. Simmons

Lawyer

2,181 satisfied customers

16 yrs. of experience including criminal law.

RobertJDFL

RobertJDFL

Lawyer

2,016 satisfied customers

Experienced in multiple areas of the law.

LawTalk

LawTalk

Lawyer

1,815 satisfied customers

30 years legal experience

Nate

Nate

Lawyer

1,750 satisfied customers

Over 10 years of criminal defense practice.

Marsha411JD

Marsha411JD

Lawyer

1,640 satisfied customers

Licensed attorney with 29 yrs. exp. in criminal law

Barrister

Barrister

Criminal Defense Law

1,266 satisfied customers

17 years practicing criminal defense.

< Previous | Next >

Related Criminal Law Questions
For a Federal Criminal Lawyer: In a federal criminal case in
In a federal criminal case in the district of Oregon where a motion to suppress had a hearing and an opinion was issued that denied it, several years have gone by and trial has not been held as yet. 1) Is there any situation where a new motion can be filed or the denial challenged prior to the trial when new facts or new case law has been found that could change the opinion? 2) What about if case law or facts existed at the time of the first motion to suppress were not presented or ignored by the court? … read more
lucy7368
lucy7368
Juris Doctor
763 satisfied customers
I have a boyfriend in jail right now and he was recenly picked
I have a boyfriend in jail right now and he was recenly picked up for violation of probation by his probation officer he. he went to jail and his court date was on a friday. they said he failed to rep… read more
Zoey, JD
Zoey, JD
Doctoral Degree
198 satisfied customers
Hi again. In my 1983 and 1985 federal lawsuit I plan to file
Hi again. In my 1983 and 1985 federal lawsuit I plan to file against multiple parties. Right now I have six counts, including two conspiracy counts. That's a lot of parties. When I file my complaint t… read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
I have a friend that is incarcerated and is representing himself.
I have a friend that is incarcerated and is representing himself. He is asking me to help him find 2 items... 1) Sample of a 995 motion (motion to dismiss?) 2) Copy of traversing a warrant or a motion… read more
Ely
Ely
Counselor at Law
Juris Doctor
3,248 satisfied customers
Is it possible to ask a Dallas, Texas state court judge to
Is it possible to ask a Dallas, Texas state court judge to reconsider the sentence handed out in open-court plea?… read more
JB-Umphrey
JB-Umphrey
Attorney & Counselor
Juris Doctor
606 satisfied customers
If a person got a charge for DUI which they took a plea bargain
If a person got a charge for DUI which they took a plea bargain of Reckless Driving for in Olympia Municipal Court in Olympia, WA (Washington State) then they did the license suspension and probation … read more
JB-Umphrey
JB-Umphrey
Attorney & Counselor
Juris Doctor
606 satisfied customers
my boyfriend voilated his probation will he have to do his
my boyfriend voilated his probation will he have to do his suspended sentence or do more time.… read more
TexLawyer
TexLawyer
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
24 satisfied customers
after i finsh all my required classes and probation, is my
after i finsh all my required classes and probation, is my domestic violence record would bw erased?… read more
Joseph
Joseph
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
7,245 satisfied customers
My husband got his first dui and he is 52 years old. He lost
My husband got his first dui and he is 52 years old. He lost his job of 21 years, four months ago. Here in Tn the legal limit is 0.8 and his was 0.95 taken from a breathalyzer. The first breathalyzer … read more
AttorneyTom
AttorneyTom
Attorney at Law
Juris Doctor, BSBA
1 satisfied customers
i have to go to court in 2 days for a probation violation i
i have to go to court in 2 days for a probation violation i dont have a lawyer this is my 3rd time to court the last 2 times the judge told me he would give me time to get a lawyer but i have not been… read more
Zoey, JD
Zoey, JD
Doctoral Degree
198 satisfied customers
i was convicted of contib to the del of a juv in 99. did a
i was convicted of contib to the del of a juv in 99. did a bit of jail time for violating probationgot out then finshed probation. as a side note i was to register as a sex offender for 10 yrs even th… read more
Joseph
Joseph
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
7,245 satisfied customers
i had a failuer to stop for blue lights and siren in south
i had a failuer to stop for blue lights and siren in south carolina . was convicted on nov. 3 1999 completed all of sentence including probation in half time.. and officer wreck his car and was injuri… read more
MShore Law
MShore Law
Doctoral Degree
1,233 satisfied customers
Hello, My son has been incarcerated now for 5 years and once
Hello, My son has been incarcerated now for 5 years and once again went before the parole broad and was once again flopped. After going before the parole broad he was told to keep up the good work and… read more
AttorneyTom
AttorneyTom
Attorney at Law
Juris Doctor, BSBA
1 satisfied customers
I am working with a nurse who was convicted of B&E, a class
I am working with a nurse who was convicted of B&E, a class H felony. He was sentenced to probation, community service, and restitution. He states that after he completes this he will have his record … read more
CrimLaw
CrimLaw
Juris Doctor (JD)
47 satisfied customers
Im working on the rough draft of a motion for a prison inmate
I'm working on the rough draft of a motion for a prison inmate to submit pro se. This is a MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF A MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE AND WITHDRAW PLEA (Alford-Newman plea) post conviction i… read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
if u got charged w/ a theft 2 then charged w/ a theft 3, do u have a record?
So like two years ago i got charged w/ a theft 2 and had to do comminuty service. so i finshed it, and got it expunged because it was my first offense. and just yesterday i got caught w/ $30 dollars w… read more
Curtis Staropoli, Esq
Curtis Staropoli, Esq
Principal and Managing Attorney
Juris Doctor
744 satisfied customers
my husband is on probation. he has a fenoly on his record but
my husband is on probation. he has a fenoly on his record but is a hard working man and is in college. he does what they ask him to do but they still give him a hard time every month. its almost like … read more
Len
Len
Attorney at Law
Doctoral Degree
444 satisfied customers
my son was never in trouble before, he try to steel a
my son was never in trouble before, he try to steel a raido no changes was press. but he hade 6 month hip. and 3 yrs supervised probation he did every thing, but still has 1.5 yrs. left . how can he g… read more
Michelle
Michelle
Doctoral Degree
2,604 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x