How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Zoey_ JD Your Own Question
Zoey_ JD
Zoey_ JD, JustAnswer Criminal Law Mentor
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 27705
Experience:  Admitted to NYS Criminal defense bar in 1989. Extensive arraignment, hearing, trial experience.
Type Your Criminal Law Question Here...
Zoey_ JD is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I got pulled over because I didn't have a front license

Customer Question

I got pulled over because I didn't have a front license plate but I did I told the cop that I did then he ran my name and I had a warrant I got search and found personal meth it was cinco the mayo I was wering a hat But the reason I got pulled over was a lie
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Criminal Law
Expert:  Zoey_ JD replied 1 year ago.


Did the police officer give you a ticket for the license plate?

A police officer doesn't need much to pull a car over. Doesn't need probable cause. He only needs something called an articulable reason. That is, he can't pull you over on a hunch. He has to be able to explain why.

What he can't do is pull you over on a pretext -- a false excuse. If his reason was that your plate was missing, and he didn't ticket you for the missing plate, and if, in fact there was no missing plate at all, then his stop was pretextual. It was only after he stopped for the plate that he discovered the warrant.

So it would appear that the stop and subsquent search and seizure may have been unlawful and in violation of your Fourth Amendment rights. However, that in and of itself won't make this case immediately go away. The US Supreme Court has said there are no hard rules about what isn't Constitutional. Every case must get decided on an individual basis at a special pre-trial suppression hearing designed to explore and challenge whether the police overstepped their authority.

If you wish to fight these charges, your lawyer will be able to get you such a hearing. At such a hearing,the prosecutor will call the officer who will take the stand and tell why he pulled you over and how it led to your arrest. Your lawyer would get the opportunity to cross examine the officer and show how he violated your rights.

The standard that the court must use to judge such a hearing is what a reasonable officer would do under the same circumstances. If the judge finds the search unreasonable, the drugs seized could be suppressed and your case could be dismissed at that point.

If the judge finds the police conduct reasonable, on the other hand, the charges will stand and the case will move forward to jury selection and trial.

You don't, of course, have to have the hearing or go to trial. There would likely be a plea offer available to you. But whether you want to negotiate a deal or challenge the stop at hearings, you should have a lawyer representing you here.

If you can afford one, have him with you at your arraignment, and he'll take it from there and advise you based on what he learns about your case. If you can't afford an attorney, plead not guilty at your arraignment, tell the judge you cannot afford private counsel and ask him to appoint you a free lawyer.

Customer: replied 1 year ago.
The officer didn't give me a ticket just the a charge of possetion
Expert:  Zoey_ JD replied 1 year ago.

Thank you.

If the officer never gave you a ticket, that'a a fact in your favor which may help you prove at a hearing that the stop was based on a pretext and that everything following it would be illegal. However, that determination of unconstitutionality will have to wait for that pretrial suppression hearing. That is how such matters are determined. So even though this may have been an unlawful stop, search, and seizure, this case will continue until the judge can hear both sides of the evidence as to that matter and then rule on it.