How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Law Educator, Esq. Your Own Question
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq., Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 116797
Experience:  Attorney with over 20 years law enforcement, prosecution, civil rights and defense experience
Type Your Criminal Law Question Here...
Law Educator, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

What is the Federal banking law concerning someone without

This answer was rated:

What is the Federal banking law concerning someone without POA either in writing or on record with the bank that passed the checks for two years, signing the elder persons name?
Thank you for your question. I look forward to working with you to provide you the information you are seeking for educational purposes.

This is not an actual banking statute, it is a determination that needs to be made against the bank regarding whether or not they used proper duty of care to examine the signatures on the checks when presented. The question is whether a bank which has failed to verify any of the drawer's signatures on the forged checks because they fell below the bank's threshold can nonetheless be considered to have exercised "ordinary care" in paying the items. The banks defend themselves against these allegations claiming that a account holder should be reviewing their monthly statements to verify payments taken from their account and had they done so the bank could have stopped payment in a reasonable time.

Thus, the first step you need to take is you need to find out what the particular bank's threshold is for verifying signatures is and if they complied with that threshold and if they did not then you could consider getting an attorney for the trust to pursue the bank for breach of their duty of care to the account holder. The bank is only liable to exercise an ordinary duty of care by following their rules and guidelines in verifying signatures.

I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. Please consider that I am answering the question or question that is posed in your posting based upon my reading of your post and sometimes misunderstandings can occur. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered.

Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO RECEIVE ANY CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.

Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.

This is NOT the practice of law nor is it legal advice to you, it is merely educational information for you to use to seek out a licensed attorney in your state to get actual legal advice from them. Please use sites such as or or to find a local attorney to get actual legal advice in all matters.

Customer: replied 3 years ago.

thank you the bank is Wells Fargo and since my aunt was incapcitated

she was unable to audit her statements


My aunt's Trust named my mother as ist succesor (also deceased) and me as second successor. The third successor who signed the checks

fought me in court for...I won and also was named PREP.


Estate attorney has advised me that beneficiaries may hold resposible if i do not perform my fidicary duty in this matter.

As the Attorney General of PA.where the Trust was written.A banker pulled upthe Fedaeral Banking Laws tht the bank has responsibilty

Thank you for your response.

You do have to pursue the claim, but you have to prove that the bank did not exercise proper care in validating the signatures according to what the laws state. The bank may have liability, it just depends on what the evidence shows. In either case you must have an attorney to sue the bank on behalf of the trust.
Law Educator, Esq. and 3 other Criminal Law Specialists are ready to help you