How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Ely Your Own Question
Ely, Counselor at Law
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 102356
Experience:  Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.
Type Your Criminal Law Question Here...
Ely is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

What is the "reasonable person" distance to be from someone/someplace/something

This answer was rated:

What is the "reasonable person" distance to be from someone/someplace/something to not be considered to be "threatoning" to that person/place/thing? Just standing, unarmed, not menacing in any way.
Hello friend, I hope all is well.

This is a very subjective situation. The Tex. Penal Code does not define what is "reasonable." This is up to the D.A., and ultimately, the jury. Allow me to explain (and I know that we have touched base on this earlier).

After a complaint is made, the D.A. decides whether or not to file a criminal complaint, ultimately. The litmus test for whether or not someone may be charged is prima facie evidence of guilt. A good translation for this is "at first glance."

If the D.A. feel that there is enough "at first glance" for a charge, they will likely pursue it.

But, this is just the beginning. The D.A. still then has the duty to prove the criminal action beyond a reasonable doubt. If no plea deal is agreed upon, the matter falls to the Judge (or the jury, because the Defendant may request a jury trial, and the Defense almost always goes for a jury trial). If so, then it is ultimately up to 12 individuals - laymen - to decide what "threatening" actually means in the situation, and, whether or not the Defendant was guilty of being/doing so beyond a reasonable doubt.

So, there is no one answer, but a whole host of answers, depending on who you ask, and what state of the prosecution you are in.

But, provided that one is clearly unarmed, not advancing, and not shouting any immediate threats (i.e. "I am going to kill/hurt you"), claiming that said person is threatening is somewhat of of a stretch - the D.A. is unlikely to pursue such a charge.

I hope this helps and clarifies.
Ely and other Criminal Law Specialists are ready to help you