How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Thomas Swartz Your Own Question
Thomas Swartz
Thomas Swartz, Lawyer
Category: Criminal Law
Satisfied Customers: 3175
Experience:  Twenty one years experience as a lawyer in New York and New Jersey. Former Appellate Law Clerk.
Type Your Criminal Law Question Here...
Thomas Swartz is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

can a person be convicted of DUI by a HGN field test alone

This answer was rated:

can a person be convicted of DUI by a HGN field test alone
Hello peanutbutter,

Yes. Under Washington's DUI law - RCW 46.61.502 - the State can obtain a conviction if they can show that the person was "under the influence of" or drove while “affected by” alcohol. They do not need to prove a specific blood alcohol content level.

The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test is one of the recognized field sobriety tests which is sufficient to demonstrate being affected by alcohol. The test must be administered properly. But it by itself is sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction.

However, this does not mean that the HGN test can not be contradicted by other evidence. The jerking of the eyeball (nystagmus) can be caused by many things other than intoxication. Nystagmus can also be caused by head injuries, rotation of the body, temperature differences from one ear to the other, a foreign fluid in the blood, objects moving into and out of sight, traffic driving by, strobe lights, tired eyes, brain tumors, brain damage, and inner ear disorders, to name a few. So in any DUI prosecution the defendant can introduce evidence that the nystagmus was caused by one of these other factors and not because of intoxication. It would then be up to the court or jury to determine which evidence is more credible.

I hope this answers your question.

Thomas Swartz and 3 other Criminal Law Specialists are ready to help you