How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Brandon M. Your Own Question
Brandon M.
Brandon M., Counselor at Law
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 12620
Experience:  California licensed attorney
Type Your California Employment Law Question Here...
Brandon M. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Hello, I have recently been singled out at work in secret

Customer Question


I have recently been singled out at work in secret by my employer to be scrutinized by the very staff I was hired to manage. I found out through word of mouth that a secret email went out to staff to watch me while I work without any notification from my direct supervisor about concerns with my competency in the work place. I feel lied to and completely deceived about my job title and description. It has now created a hostile environment with the staff showing utter disrespect to me (the general manager). Mocking and disregarding any of my delegated duties as manager. I no longer feel secure in the work place and I am receiving no help from upper management to correct this issue. I feel completely helpless and outcasted. Do I have any legal right to approach my employer with a lawsuit. Please advise.
Submitted: 5 years ago.
Category: California Employment Law
Expert:  Brandon M. replied 5 years ago.

Brandon M. :

Hello there.

Brandon M. and other California Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 5 years ago.
So, an answer?
Expert:  Brandon M. replied 5 years ago.

Hello. Can you see this?

Customer: replied 5 years ago.
Expert:  Brandon M. replied 5 years ago.

Very good. I will start by saying that I am not optimistic, but let's discuss this and see if a favorable answer can be found. To start, do we know what the motivation is here? In other words, why have you been singled out in this way?

Customer: replied 5 years ago.
I am not from in town. I am not a local. Poor position implementation on managements part. Certain employees are in fear of losing their position and are starting rumors that make it back to my boss and start a chain reaction of stress and doubt.
Expert:  Brandon M. replied 5 years ago.
I am not clear on how not being local would have any bearing. Are you saying that you are being treated like an outsider and they are protecting their turf?
Customer: replied 5 years ago.
yes. exactly
Expert:  Brandon M. replied 5 years ago.

The job is in the private, not public, sector, correct?


Customer: replied 5 years ago.
it is a restaurant. I am the general manager.
Expert:  Brandon M. replied 5 years ago.

Well, as I mentioned, I don't have a lot of optimism. California is an employment-at-will state, which basically means that either the employer or the employee can modify or terminate the employment relationship at most any time and for most any reason. For this reason, unlike some other jurisdictions, there is no presumption that the employer has an unequal bargaining position, so there are no extra protections in place for the employee; if either side does not like their arrangement, they have the right to quit. The employee can quit the relationship if he does not like the employer, and the employer can quit the relationship if it does not like the employee. So an employer can generally discriminate against an employee for most any reason. It's not fair, but it's generally legal.


This is not without limitation. Some reasons for discrimination are illegal; for example, it is illegal to discriminate against an employee because of their race/color, gender, religion, ethnicity, age (if over 40) disability, genetic information, or in retaliation because the employee is a whistle-blower. It is not illegal, however, to discriminate for reasons that are simply unfair or ill-informed. The breakdown of inter-personal relationships is generally a valid reason.


On the other side of the equation, this also does not give the employer or employees a blank check to spread rumors. Even if an employer has the right to discriminate, this does not give it the right to make objectively false statements. Defamation of character is (1) a false statement (2) which exposes a person to public contempt, ridicule or disgrace or causes others to think badly of the person defamed (3) and is made to a third party. When the defamation pertains to the plaintiff's work or business, it is considered "defamation per se", meaning that the plaintiff can prevail without proving actual damages (meaning, even if you are not fired and even if you are not disciplined, you can be awarded money damages). Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but when that opinion amounts to objective falsity, they can be held responsible for their statements.


Because the nuances of every case are different, you should not rely on this information as advice or apply it to a specific situation without a more thorough consultation with counsel.


Let me know if further clarification is needed, and please keep in mind that the experts are not credited for unaccepted answers; even where I cannot solve every problem in a case, my hope is that you can at least feel confident in your knowledge so you can get the best outcome under the circumstances, whatever that outcome may be. Please remember to click accept once you are finished. Thank you.

Customer: replied 5 years ago.
Rumors are being generally spread by staff below me to other staff members and outsiders about me and my ability here. It is a small town and this will effect employment in the future. Could I approach defamation of character?
Customer: replied 5 years ago.
Also did my first click on the accept button pay you or do I have to click accept again?
Expert:  Brandon M. replied 5 years ago.

Hello again. I am not quite sure if I understand the question. The question is "could I approach defamation of character?" Are you asking if you have a factual foundation to file a lawsuit on that basis?


As I mentioned, a viable lawsuit for defamation of character requires three factual elements. There must be: (1) a false statement (2) which exposes a person to public contempt, ridicule or disgrace or causes others to think badly of the person defamed (3) and is made to a third party. If those elements are present, the plaintiff has a factual foundation for a defamation of character suit. Otherwise, the plaintiff does not. Does that make sense?


You already clicked accept, so there is no expectation to do so a second time unless you wish to ask an unrelated question.