California Employment Law

Have California Employment Law Questions? Ask a Lawyer.

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

California Employment Law
This answer was rated:

ToCustomer~ The hearing was today. It was over in

ToCustomer~ The hearing was...
ToCustomer~ The hearing was today. It was over in about 10 minutes. Only one rep showed up and she was very polite. The ALJ explained the process and I asked if i could object during her testimony and he said no, so I advised that I objected to all hearsay. He then stated that hearsay was allowed and he may base his decision "solely on hearsay". I then explained that I requested specific dates and times that I was alleged to have refused work and that I also requested a subpoena per my conversation with a judge. He said he was aware of that. 

School A rep then testified to "nothing" and stated she did not have dates or times but she had a copy of an e-mail that was sent to Jane Doe from Jane Doe that I didn't like certain schools, etc. I stated that was speculation, he said it wasn't, he then seemed to reverse what he said about hearsay and made the comment that it is "such hearsay" he didn't know that he could use it (something like that). He then proceeded to chastise the School Rep for not keeping records and how important it was to keep records and why did they not have a phone system?? She said they just didn't, the secretaries call the subs. At that point I really felt like he was rooting for them. 

He then questioned me about the distance etc, I said I was not resistant to long commutes and have driven 45 minutes in one direction, and worked at several schools that required a commute, etc. I then closed my statement with "the employer has not produced any evidence of first hand knowledge that I have refused a bona offer of employment, or that I have not been available for work, or misrepresented information. 

We both walked out of the office and told each other to have a nice day!
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own California Employment Law Question
Answered in 43 minutes by:
2/1/2012
socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,347
Experience: Retired (mostly)
Verified
All I can say is that it appears you did everything right, and that your closing argument emphasized the correct points. I would have objected to the email as substantially more prejudicial than probative and offered totally without any indicia of trustworthiness -- it could have been a complete fabrication. Other than that, if the ALJ rules against you, you'll have to appeal. Based on what you've described, I don't see how you can possibly lose, because for all practical purposes, you testified and the school did not.

Hope this helps.


And, if you need to contact me again, please put my user id on the title line of your question (“ToCustomerrdquo;), and the system will send me an alert. Thanks!

socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,347
Experience: Retired (mostly)
Verified
socrateaser and 87 other California Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Customer reply replied 5 years ago
As he was looking at the e-mail document - I said something like, that's speculation more prejudicial than probative, not sure if I used the word substantially (so I did get it in there) That's when he said, well it's not speculative and then mumbled something about "it's so much hearsay that's he's not even sure he can use it".
I got the impression he was telling the school - you have to keep records to win this case - and the school rep shrugged her shoulders like, yeah I know we blew it. I will be surprised if I lost.
Thank you for all the mind bending conversations. I learned a little about law from you and found it really interesting.
And, hey, we got to discuss liquor, too!

Let me know how it all turns out.
socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,347
Experience: Retired (mostly)
Verified
socrateaser and 87 other California Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Customer reply replied 5 years ago
LOL But we never discussed beer - Firestone IPA Union Jack ;-) Take care.
Too much gas. Beer makes me feel like I'm 10 months pregnant.
socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,347
Experience: Retired (mostly)
Verified
socrateaser and 87 other California Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Customer reply replied 5 years ago
That CAN be a problem ;-)
Yep. Especially for a man (not so much for an Elephant).
socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,347
Experience: Retired (mostly)
Verified
socrateaser and 87 other California Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Customer reply replied 5 years ago
I have a question - when he was reading the e-mail and I stated "calls for speculation, more prejudicial than probative, why did he say it was "not speculation"? I realize I probably did not make the statement correctly, but wasn't the employee's allegation in the e-mail "speculative". I got the vibe before I even walked in the door he believed them over me, even though they proved nothing.
Speculation is evidence that represents the opinion, rather than the observation of the witness. That is, a witness who is not an expert must generally testify from personal knowledge, with a few exceptions: laywitnesses can state opinions about things which are within the common experience of an ordinary person (e.g., "He looked drunk"; "She was stacked"; "It was a beautiful sunset").

An email stating that "he didn't like certain schools" could mean that the author was voicing an opinion, based upon other undisclosed facts, that you didn't like to teach in certain schools, in which case the statement does indeed call for speculation, because that's not within the common knowledge of an ordinary person -- or, the statement could be based upon your out-of-court statement, which would be an admission -- and which is an exception to the hearsay rule.

What's really at stake in this letter is that we don't have either the sender or the recipient on the witness stand, so there is no means of authenticating the email as what it is purported to be (obj: no foundation). The witness didn't even get the email from the sender or recipient, so the witness has no personal knowledge of whether or not the email came from the sender or recipient. It could be a complete fabrication (obj: no personal knowledge). The statement "didn't like certain schools" is ambiguous -- it could be reasonably interpreted more than one way.

In every circumstance above, the email is clearly and convincingly more likely to confuse or mislead than it is to probe for the truth, therefore its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of counfusion and that means the email is inadmissible, even at the level of a UI hearing.

I don't see how the judge can use that email, so if he does, then I believe you have a pretty strong appeal argument.

Hope this helps.


And, if you need to contact me again, please put my user id on the title line of your question (“ToCustomerrdquo;), and the system will send me an alert. Thanks!

socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,347
Experience: Retired (mostly)
Verified
socrateaser and 87 other California Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Customer reply replied 5 years ago
I see, that's why he said he wasn't sure if he could use the statement. It's in reference to being "admissible". The rep clearly had no knowledge of the statement. The judge assumed she had "written statements" and she no, she only had a copy of an e-mail, which she had to fumble around to find.

I wonder why they didn't write statements? Would that have been more admissible?
If the rep had spoken to you on the phone, or if the rep had obtained the email from the person who spoke to you on the phone, then that would have at least placed a witness in court who knew the source of the email, so that there was some proof that the email wasn't a product of an imaginative author with a word processor. But, that's not what happened. So, like I said, I don't see how this email can possibly be relevant evidence, because there is no proof that it is even the slightest bit trustworthy.

Hope this helps (and, oh yeah, your clicking Accept once in a while would be greatly appreciated).


And, if you need to contact me again, please put my user id on the title line of your question (“ToCustomerrdquo;), and the system will send me an alert. Thanks!


socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,347
Experience: Retired (mostly)
Verified
socrateaser and 87 other California Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Customer reply replied 5 years ago
Accept - what's that ;-)
It's what gives baby new shoes.
Ask Your Own California Employment Law Question
Customer reply replied 5 years ago
And shoes are important.
Yes -- very. Don't get me started.
Ask Your Own California Employment Law Question
Customer reply replied 5 years ago
I won my appeal! :)
Of course you did. You did everything right...and (ahem) so did I.

Congratulations!
socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,347
Experience: Retired (mostly)
Verified
socrateaser and 87 other California Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Customer reply replied 5 years ago
LOL. Yes YOU did! :) Catch you later.
Customer reply replied 5 years ago
FYI - ""The only evidence of the rejection of job offers was second and third-hand hearsay from secretaries".

"Testimony given at the hearing under oath and subject to cross-examination is generally entitled to greater weight than hearsay statements", "If weaker and less satisfactory evidence is offered when it was within the power of the party to produce stronger and more satisfactory evidence, the evidence offered should be viewed with distrust".
Ask socrateaser Your Own Question
socrateaser
socrateaser
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,347
39,347 Satisfied Customers
Experience: Retired (mostly)

socrateaser is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help.

Mary C.Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

LawTalk

LawTalk

Attorney

1,285 satisfied customers

I have 30 years of experience in the practice of law, including employment law and discrimination law.

Tina

Tina

Attorney

923 satisfied customers

JD, 17 years experience & recognized by ABA for excellence in employment law.

Brandon, Esq.

Brandon, Esq.

Lawyer

348 satisfied customers

Has received a certificate of recognition from the California State Senate for his outstanding legal service.

melissamesq

melissamesq

Attorney

47 satisfied customers

Represent clients to maximum recovery in employment cases.

legalg

legalg

Other

31 satisfied customers

General Practitioner. Research Attorney

Attorney2020

Attorney2020

Lawyer.

69 satisfied customers

I have significant experience in employment law.

Legal Counsel

Legal Counsel

Lawyer

32 satisfied customers

California Licensed Attorney- 29 years- Wages, Hours, Overtime, Discrimination, Wrongful Termination.

< Previous | Next >

Related California Employment Law Questions
I was verbally suspended from work yesterday, for a term of
I was verbally suspended from work yesterday, for a term of one week. I was also told that I would be on probation when I come back, and that I need to take sensitivity and anger management course. I … read more
LegalPro54
LegalPro54
Doctoral Degree
1,258 satisfied customers
I have a employee that it on salary, they was out for a week
i have a employee that it on salary, they was out for a week due to being sick. Do i still have to pay them a full week salary or just the three day. … read more
LegalPro54
LegalPro54
Doctoral Degree
1,258 satisfied customers
Just looking for advice on best exit out of a company their
Hi there, just looking for advice on best exit out of a company their retention bonus is too far out … read more
Olivia Kent
Olivia Kent
Managing Partner
Law (J.D.) and Medicine (M.D.)
1,421 satisfied customers
An investigative consumer reporting agency (ICRA) performing
An investigative consumer reporting agency (ICRA) performing a background check for a California (Los Angeles) employer located a misdemeanor record from March 2017 that resulted in a deferred prosecu… read more
LegalPro54
LegalPro54
Doctoral Degree
1,258 satisfied customers
My employer changed my work schedule less than 2 days prior.
My employer changed my work schedule less than 2 days prior. Now im facing and no call-no show. Is that legal for the employer to that? … read more
LawGuy
LawGuy
Juris Doctor
123 satisfied customers
I WAS TERMINATED 10/5/2017. CHECK STUBS WERE SENT TO MY
I WAS TERMINATED 10/5/2017. CHECK STUBS WERE SENT TO MY EMAIL ON THAT DAY. ON APPROX 10/10/2017 MONIES WERE SENT TO MY BANK. I HAD TO EMAIL THE EMPLOYER BEFORE ACTION WAS TAKEN. AMOUNT $5000 ISH, 4 WE… read more
INFOLAWYER
INFOLAWYER
Partner
Doctoral Degree
55,411 satisfied customers
I was sent home on paid leave almost 8 weeks ago, for no
I was sent home on paid leave almost 8 weeks ago, for no reason (is what I was told). They needed to do some investigating on the issue- what issue? … read more
LegalPro54
LegalPro54
Doctoral Degree
1,258 satisfied customers
I was arrested with domestic violence and I asked my
I was arrested with domestic violence and I asked my criminal lawyer that the police arrested me by mistake. Now I worried about my arrest record will affect my job application … read more
Zoey, JD
Zoey, JD
Doctoral Degree
175 satisfied customers
I recently terminated an employee whom admitted to stealing
I recently terminated an employee whom admitted to stealing money from a customer that left his wallet in the car. The employee worked for us for roughly 10 years and as you can imagine was not happy … read more
Roy Hadavi
Roy Hadavi
Attorney
Juris Doctorate
886 satisfied customers
Thank you for your counsel on our employee problem., my son,
Thank you for your counsel on our employee problem. Josh, my son, has been asking the questions so far. Having read the conversation threads, I would assume that you must have a rather negative view o… read more
socrateaser
socrateaser
Lawyer
39,347 satisfied customers
I am a part-time employee at a local organization that has
Hi. I am a part-time employee at a local organization that has its own office. The organization also has other part time workers at the office who come in Mondays and Fridays. The boss is out Mondays … read more
LegalPro54
LegalPro54
Doctoral Degree
1,258 satisfied customers
I am wondering i am still on my dads medical and dental
i am wondering i am still on my dads medical and dental insurance i have both a physical and non physical disability i am wondering if there is a way where i can have his insurance for life and if so … read more
legalg
legalg
Other
Juris Doctorate
31 satisfied customers
Thank you for your recent advise on how best to handle our
Thank you for your recent advise on how best to handle our disgruntled ex-employee. There are a few points that I would like clarified: To recap the basis of our original question: Our employee was th… read more
socrateaser
socrateaser
Lawyer
39,347 satisfied customers
I have a California EDD situation I was in where I
Hello,I have a California EDD situation I was in where I mistakenly claimed extra benefits for 4 months. Mistakenly in the sense that I didn't understand I wasn't allowed to claim when I had a full-ti… read more
LegalPro54
LegalPro54
Doctoral Degree
1,258 satisfied customers
We have a co-worker in the office that is always causing
We have a co-worker in the office that is always causing arguments, pushing buttons etc. I work with her just 2 days a week and the day before we're working together and that day i always have a bad h… read more
socrateaser
socrateaser
Lawyer
39,347 satisfied customers
I was off from a tech startup with vested shares. I signed a
I was laid off from a tech startup with vested shares. I signed a purchase agreement for the shares which was cosigned by the CEO but not witnessed. The agreement was stapled to a copy of the money or… read more
socrateaser
socrateaser
Lawyer
39,347 satisfied customers
Going through a edd audit. Audit questionnaire recieved. Its
Going through a edd audit. Audit questionnaire recieved. … read more
Phillips Esq.
Phillips Esq.
Attorney
Juris Doctor
17,961 satisfied customers
I was curious about constructive dismissals. There are
There are several eyewitness accounts of one major incident and documents evidencing an ongoing problem...I do not have access to those documents though. … read more
Roy Hadavi
Roy Hadavi
Attorney
Juris Doctorate
886 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x