How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask socrateaser Your Own Question
socrateaser, Lawyer
Category: California Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 38894
Experience:  Retired (mostly)
Type Your California Employment Law Question Here...
socrateaser is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

This question pertains to unemployment eligibility in the state

This answer was rated:

This question pertains to unemployment eligibility in the state of California. I’d been collecting unemployment after being laid off from my government job of 9 years @ 43.00/hr. on 12/15/2009. I took a job a much lower paying seasonal job @8.00/hr. at a local box mover. I worked there for a very short period of time (11/22/2010 until 12/2/2010) about 9 day’s total. I left that job after interviewing at another employer 3 times, thinking I had another job offer coming in my classification and pay scale. That job never paned out, I didn’t return to the employer knowing I could not do the job I was hired for, I realized right away I could not work the hours and stand for that period of time without suffering pain. I should have never taken that job.

Yesterday I interviewed with the California Employment Development Department it sounds like they are going deny extending my unemployment claim due to the short employment. If so, is there any acceptation I can ask a appeal’s board to consider that would allow me to continue receiving unemployment claim against my pervious long term employer?

It is a matter of staying solvent in my home or not.
Thank you,
A claimant is unemployed during "[A]ny week of less than full-time work, if the wages payable to him or her with respect to the week, when reduced by twenty-five dollars ($25) or 25 percent of the wages payable, whichever is greater, do not equal or exceed his or her weekly benefit amount." UI Code 1252.

Based upon your stated facts, you probably did not violate the above-stated rule. However, you may have accepted "full-time work" (40 hours per week), and that may have disqualified you from receiving UI benefits.

If my assumptions are accurate, then you may be able to claim that you had a definite offer, which was later withdrawn. In order to do this you must show:

  • Definiteness: A definite assurance of employment, and
  • Betterment: A substantially better job, and
  • Permanence: A job as permanent as the job the claimant left, or
  • Reasonableness: Whether a reasonable person genuinely desirous of retaining employment would have left to accept the offered employment.
The most important factor is reasonableness. That is if you can show that you left your current work under circumstance where any reasonable person would have done the same, then you would not be disqualified from receiving UI benefits.

Hope this helps.

NOTICE: My goal here is to educate others about the law. I am always available to answer your follow-up questions after you click Accept – however, if you do not click Accept, the website gets paid, and I receive nothing. This is true, even if you are on a subscription plan. So please click Accept, so that I will be able to continue to provide this service for others in the future.

And, if you need to contact me again, please put my user id on the title line of your question (“To Socrateaser”), and the system will send me an alert. Thanks!

socrateaser and other California Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you