How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Lucy, Esq. Your Own Question
Lucy, Esq.
Lucy, Esq., Attorney
Category: Business Law
Satisfied Customers: 29985
Experience:  Attorney
Type Your Business Law Question Here...
Lucy, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Is an Attorney recommended as a general rule.

Customer Question

Is an Attorney recommended as a general rule.
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Business Law
Expert:  Lucy, Esq. replied 1 year ago.


I'm Lucy, and I'd be happy to answer your questions today.

It really depends on the type of case. For things like malpractice, an attorney is almost always needed because you have to find and present expert witnesses, and they know how to do that. For cases where only a few thousand dollars is at stake, the lawyer will cost you more than the recovery, so there's often no need (and many lawyers won't take those cases).

When there is a statute that authorizes a winning plaintiff to recover attorney's fees, like with discrimination cases, it is usually best to have an attorney because the chances of winning the case are higher and many will agree that you don't have to pay if you lose (that needs to be in writing).

Related Business Law Questions