How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask BizIPEsq. Your Own Question
BizIPEsq., Attorney
Category: Business Law
Satisfied Customers: 996
Experience:  I am a business attorney. I represent individuals and companies with all business related matters.
Type Your Business Law Question Here...
BizIPEsq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

In trying to vacate a default judgement, the party filing the

This answer was rated:

In trying to vacate a default judgement, the party filing the motion has to provide for a proposed answer. Is this the actual answer that would be filed if the default was vacated, or can they file a different one? reason I ask is because I'm going through this process as the plaintiff with a default filed, and the defendant filed a proposed answer but it's not a very thorough one, and the affirmative defenses section is basically a laundry list of laws without much in terms of facts. Would they have an opportunity to file a different answer if the motion to vacate default is granted?

BizIPEsq. :

Hello, I will be assisting you

BizIPEsq. :

Generally a proposed answer included in a motion to set a default motion aside is the answer that would be used. Although be mindful that once the case goes back on "normal" track the defendant will have the right to amend their answer at least once so the answer could be amended in the future

BizIPEsq. :

thank you for allowing me to assist you

Customer: Thanks. So because the motion to vacate rests on submission of a proposed answer does the judge actually rely on the content of the answer at all to determine on the vacate? We pointed out in our memo that the proposed answer lacks any facts and as such fails to state a claim. Would judges look at it then and factor that in?
BizIPEsq. :

For the most part the motion to set aside is not substantive on the mertis of the case rather it's about giving the judge an excusable reason why the action was not answered in time. So technically the judge is not suppose to rely on the answer but often if the answer is attached they take a look and unofficially add that to their consideration even if unofficially.

BizIPEsq. :

Thank you for your continued patronage. Please rate my service.

BizIPEsq. :

Without your rating I do not get compensated for my work.

BizIPEsq. and other Business Law Specialists are ready to help you