How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask socrateaser Your Own Question
socrateaser, Attorney
Category: Business Law
Satisfied Customers: 38913
Experience:  Retired (mostly)
Type Your Business Law Question Here...
socrateaser is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Can you give me any case law about the wrong corporate name

Resolved Question:

Can you give me any case law about the wrong corporate name as to one party to a contract. Their are two different corporations with similar names, but arranged in a different order. One corporation is located in southern Fl. and the other corporation is located in central Fl. l am thing that this is not a binding contract.
Submitted: 7 years ago.
Category: Business Law
Expert:  socrateaser replied 7 years ago.

In Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co. v. Data Lease Financial Corp., 302 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1974), the Florida Supreme Courtheld that "even though all of the details are not definitely fixed, an agreement may be binding if the parties agree on the essential terms and seriously understand and intend the agreement to be binding on them." Blackhawk, 302 So.2d at 408. Similarly, the Uniform Commercial Code, section 672.2-204, Florida Statutes (1986), governing the formation of contracts for sales provides in pertinent part: (3) Even though one or more terms are left open a contract for sale does not fail for indefiniteness if the parties have intended to make a contract and there is a reasonably certain basis for giving an appropriate remedy. See Zell v. Cobb, 566 So. 2d 806; 15 Fla. Law W. D 1475 (1990).


BotXXXXX XXXXXne, if the parties can be reasonably ascertained and proved to have entered into the agreement, regardless of how they may have identified themselves, the court will enforce the contract, because to do otherwise is to permit a party to escape his or her obligations. Moreover, under the doctrine of "quasi contract," parties to an unenforceable agreement will be at least required to return any unjust benefits received as a result of the unenforceable contract.


Complete escape from liability due to a faulty identity is extremely unlikely.


Hope this helps.


Terms and Conditions: By your continuing in this conversation with me, or by your clicking “Accept”, you are expressly agreeing to all of the following: (1) our communication is for entertainment purposes only; (2) you are not consulting me in my professional capacity as an attorney; (3) you do not seek to establish an attorney-client relationship with me, nor do I with you; (4) you will not rely on anything I say and you will obtain appropriate legal counsel via a traditional/office consultation with an attorney licensed to practice in the jurisdiction where your legal issue arises (and you may not use our communication to avoid taxpayer penalties imposed by the U.S. Dept. of Treasury); (5) by communicating with me in this public forum you are irrevocably waiving any right to privacy, confidentiality and attorney-client privilege concerning the matters discussed. You further separately declare that any payment made by you is not consideration for this contract, nor offered for any services rendered by me on your behalf, but rather is made in genuine admiration and respect for my desire to help others. If you do not agree with these terms and conditions, then you must advise me immediately.

socrateaser and 2 other Business Law Specialists are ready to help you

Related Business Law Questions