Bankruptcy Law

Bankruptcy Law Questions? Ask a Bankruptcy Lawyer.

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

Bankruptcy Law

I have a writ of attachment that I'm trying to show the

Customer Question
judge that a writ of...
I have a writ of attachment that I'm trying to show the judge that a writ of attachment is not the same as a judgement - in other words, it should be considered non-liquid in terms of securing a claim. The writ will push me over the limit for Chapter 13 if the judge deems to be "readily ascertainable" or liquid. Do you know of a legal cite to prove the writ is not liquid?
Submitted: 2 years ago.Category: Bankruptcy Law
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Answered in 17 minutes by:
10/25/2015
Bankruptcy Lawyer: mmdesq, Attorney replied 2 years ago
mmdesq
mmdesq, Attorney
Category: Bankruptcy Law
Satisfied Customers: 518
Experience: Attorney with 13 years experience.
Verified

Good Evening,

I will try to best answer your question.

I assume you're trying to make the debt limit in a chapter 13. The key for your argument will be that the writ of attachment is unliquidated until the asset attached is sold and therefore it should not go to the debt total if you qualify for chapter 13 debt limit.

I do not think the distinction between a writ of judgement and writ of attachment is truly the issue. Neither a writ of judgment or attachment is liquidated until an asset is sold. A writ of attachment is actually one step closer to being liquidated as it attaches to a specific asset than a writ of judgment. But as I said earlier neither is liquidated

I hope this clarification is helpful.

Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Customer reply replied 2 years ago
I appreciate the point, but my assets are currently frozen by the writ - we have not gone to court, instead a state court judge has ruled (thanks to an extremely draconian contractors license law) that all of my assets (lots in this case) are frozen until after our trial-she ruled in the space of 5 minutes that she was reasonably certain I would lose - but the amount was never discussed, she just entered their estimate ($1M) - this was astounding to me - my life and family were shut down by a 5 minute ruling that had no evidence presented, just precedents from their side.I have been in the bankruptcy process for over 6 months now, trying to stay in Chap. 13, but the judge declared in two of the hearings he is very uncertain about whether the writ is "readily ascertainable" - but clearly leans toward believing it is. I need a solid referenced case or law cite that says it is not. My hearing is coming up this Friday HELP!!!!!!
Customer reply replied 2 years ago
by the way the claimant is my brother, and it turns out that a writ can be "blown off" by a relative if bankruptcy is filed within a year of the writ. Something about 2nd degree consanguinity - so that's why I filed for Chap 13 - I just want to get back to where I was before the writ. This dude, who promised to pay for worker's comp and then reneged, has filed a writ against me after I built two homes for him, one in which we sold at a large profit and the other he lives in - he didn't pay me one red cent - and now he's put a writ on me for suing him for lack of payment - for not carrying worker's comp!! This rivals a biblical story!
Bankruptcy Lawyer: mmdesq, Attorney replied 2 years ago

What you are referring to with your brother is an insider preference.

Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Customer reply replied 2 years ago
but its good enough to release the writ-soI must convince the judge the writ is not liquid through legal means.
Customer reply replied 2 years ago
Cant talk now at arestsurant-do you think you can find a citation?
Bankruptcy Lawyer: mmdesq, Attorney replied 2 years ago

It is not a citation. It is a legal concept. Because of the attachment the debt is worth the value of the asset attached which will not be know until it is sold which makes it unliquidated.

Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Customer reply replied 2 years ago
I get your point, but the issue on the table is whether the writ of attachment is considered a valid lien - of course any asset's value is unknown until it's sold - but the lien amount (against me) is still the same. Your point is that it can't be considered valid until it's sold - I'm not sure this judge would agree with that - he would still argue that the basis for the writ is still liquid. Of course this is a "writ of attachment" and "not a writ of execution" - which is based on a judgement. Regardless, a concept is not good enough - I need the legal underpinning for the concept - but I prefer to dismiss the writ as non liquid because a jury trial is still pending - and of course the fact that the writ is removed in bankruptcy, which renders it invalid in any case. Also, the value the writ is based on was NOT subject to the same scrutiny a bankruptcy court would demand and is therefore illiquid as to merit. However, a writ is still a powerful thing and must be dealt with in legal terms - this judge is a stickler for legality....
Bankruptcy Lawyer: mmdesq, Attorney replied 2 years ago

As possed in your original question, writ of attachment must be considered unliquidated until acid attached is sold. In addition, I believe a valid argument would be that the writ of attachment is void as a preference. This would then leave the debt as liquidated but unsecured.

Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Customer reply replied 2 years ago
to understand your point, a writ of attachment is not considered liquid until assets are sold. In other words, even though there is a "pre-judgement" amount that the assets were attached to/for/because of, that amount should be ignored and instead the value of the assets should be considered as the "face value" of the writ in terms of bankruptcy? Is there a bankruptcy reference I could cite for this? This would be very helpful because the face value of the assets do not bump me over the secured amount limit in Chap. 13 Also, even though your last point helps me with the secured amount, I am already at my limit for unsecured debt, so if the writ pushes me over that limit I won't be confirmed...however, any reference that the writ can only be considered the amount of the assets would be very helpful...
Bankruptcy Lawyer: mmdesq, Attorney replied 2 years ago

A writ of judgment wold be unsecured. A writ of attachment is the value of whatever it is attached to. I would love to quote you a Bankruptcy Code section but there is not one to deal specifically with the writ of attachment. It deals with the concept of secured vs. Unsecured and liquidated vs unliquidated and provides definitions for those terms. By its very definition a writ of attachment is attached to a particular asset and therefore has to be the value of that asset. There is a downside that in the event the asset is insufficient to satisfy the underlying claim that claim could still exist after the liquidation of the attached asset. This is the problem that you referenced regarding unsecured debt they could exist based upon the claim after the asset is sold. Right now with that being unsold you can argue you don't know if that would be a security claim or an unsecured claim until that occurs as the exact amount of unsecured vs secured debt is unliquidated (cannot be determined)

Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Customer reply replied 2 years ago
I had a bad day in court, with the judge denying my motion to abstain from the lien, even saying that he is considering dismissing my bankruptcy case, so I can "duke it out" in state court - something that I just can't do - I am now insolvent!!! This is why I needed a powerful cite - I still have another chance to convince him, because my confirmation is on Nov. 10 - but I have to really make a good case - I want to stay in Chap. 13 - I filed just to avoid the attachment writ, not to have all my assets sold!!! That's a killer!!! The judge seems to think I don't qualify for Chap. 13, but I make all the limits and I have a steady income - it's this "lien" that he is stuck on. He called it a lien, but it's not!!!The following is what I found as a relevant cite. It is an appellate decision after the BAP ruled that a trustee can use an attachment lien as a claim - the appellate court understood their reasoning but reversed their ruling. I picked out some choice references, but it's good reading about liens. They clearly side with me here; however I would like to find the code that state the California law says that a writ of attachment is not enforceable by a creditor until a judgement has been obtained - I haven't been able to get that yet. Maybe you could help?IN RE:  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PLASTICS, INC., Debtor. Lawrence A. Diamant, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellant, v. Vartan Kasparian, Appellee.
No. 97-55874. Decided: January 20, 1999
Unlike the holder of a security interest, however, the attachment creditor has no right to proceed against the property until after the creditor obtains a judgment.   See Arcturus Mfg. Corp. v. Superior Court, 223 Cal.App.2d 187, 35 Cal. Rptr. 502, 505 (1964).  “The attaching creditor obtains only a potential right or a contingent lien,” Puissegur v. Yarbrough, 29 Cal.2d 409, 175 P.2d 830, 831 (1946), which is perfected or converted to a judgment lien upon judgment for the creditor, Arcturus, 35 Cal.Rptr. at 505;  cf.  Cal. Prob.Code § 9304 (describing the procedure for converting an attachment lien into a judgment lien in the context of a probate action).   The priority of the judgment lien relates back to the date of the attachment lien.   Thus, an attachment lien acts as a placemarker, ensuring the creditor's spot in the priority line until the creditor can obtain judgment.The procedure for allowance of a claim, however, is similar but not identical to that for obtaining a judgment.   In the allowance process, the validity and legality of claims are determined by applicable nonbankruptcy law.   See e.g., Christison v. Norm Ross Co. (In re Eastview Estates II ), 713 F.2d 443, 447 (9th Cir.1983).   A claim cannot be allowed if it is unenforceable under nonbankruptcy law.   See 11 U.S.C. § 502(b)(1).But it is axiomatic that, even in the bankruptcy context, state law governs the validity and extent of liens.   Moreover, the Bankruptcy Code intends to preserve, to the extent possible, the state law rights possessed by parties outside of the bankruptcy context.   See HAL, Inc. v. United States (In re Hal, Inc.), 122 F.3d 851, 852 (9th Cir.1997).   Permitting an allowance of claim to substitute for a judgment perfecting an attachment lien undermines the rights and protections created by the California Legislature.   We therefore reverse the BAP.
Bankruptcy Lawyer: Law Educator, Esq., Attorney replied 2 years ago
Law Educator, Esq.
Category: Bankruptcy Law
Satisfied Customers: 120,258
Experience: Attorney At Law handling education matters.
Verified

Thank you for your question. I look forward to working with you to provide you the information you are seeking for educational purposes only.

I am a different contributor as your previous expert has opted out.

In California, a writ of attachment lien is not perfected until a judgment has been entered. Bankruptcy Code Section 362 (a)(4) prevents any act to create, perfect, or enforce a lien against property of the estate once a petition has been filed. The CA courts hold, Under California law, certain creditors may obtain a prejudgment writ of attachment against property of the debtor by establishing the probable validity of their claims.   See Cal.Civ.Proc.Code §§ 484.090, 485.220, 486.020.   An attachment lien is created when the creditor files a notice of attachment or otherwise levies on the property.   See Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 488.500(a).   This lien has priority over subsequent liens.   See Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 488.500(b).   Unlike the holder of a security interest, however, the attachment creditor has no right to proceed against the property until after the creditor obtains a judgment.   See Arcturus Mfg. Corp. v. Superior Court, 223 Cal.App.2d 187, 35 Cal. Rptr. 502, 505 (1964).  “The attaching creditor obtains only a potential right or a contingent lien,” Puissegur v. Yarbrough, 29 Cal.2d 409, 175 P.2d 830, 831 (1946), which is perfected or converted to a judgment lien upon judgment for the creditor, Arcturus, 35 Cal.Rptr. at 505;  cf.  Cal. Prob.Code § 9304 (describing the procedure for converting an attachment lien into a judgment lien in the context of a probate action).   The priority of the judgment lien relates back to the date of the attachment lien.   Thus, an attachment lien acts as a place marker, ensuring the creditor's spot in the priority line until the creditor can obtain judgment. See: In Re: Southern California Plastics, Inc., Debtor. Lawrence A. Diamant, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Vartan Kasparian, 165 F.3d 1243 (9th Cir. 1999).

Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Customer reply replied 2 years ago
Hi,
I appreciate your answer as it was what I had hoped to get earlier. One follow up however - I am a sole proprietor who is trying to get confirmation in Chap. 13 in California. The judge, inexplicably, seems dead set against this - and is using the attachment writ "lien" as cover - however, I think there must be more to the story - but I'm at a loss to understand why. I am insolvent because of the writ, my business can't pay creditors because of the writ, the writ will be removed through the bankruptcy action - and yet the judge seems pre-disposed, and is much more comfortable with either Chap. 11 or 7, which are neither in my or my creditors best interests - Chap. 11 is inappropriate and costly and Chap. 7 will be a fire sale. I am trying to establish a credible legal basis which not only discredits the writ as a "secured lien", but also proves that Chap. 13 is best for my creditors because the removal of the writ with my assets (buildable real estate lots) intact is by far the best method to pay them back, since I am a spec builder and was attempting to pay them back when the writ came down. It almost seems that the judge feels I am "manipulating" the system to remove the writ, but so what? The attachment writ was put on through similar manipulation. The question: Is there a case where either a Chap. 13 was allowed confirmation with pending litigation (without an attachment writ) or Chap. 13 was confirmed with an attached writ? That would be extremely helpful and I would be happy to end our current back and forth...
Bankruptcy Lawyer: Law Educator, Esq., Attorney replied 2 years ago

Thank you for your question. I look forward to working with you to provide you the information you are seeking for educational purposes only.

The attachment writ for pre judgment attachment is a lien, but it is not a perfected lien as you can see above. Since it is not a perfected lien, it is not enforceable according to what the court state as you see above as well.

The cases above were allowed to proceed despite the attachment lien and BK was confirmed even prior to perfection of the attachment lien

Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Customer reply replied 2 years ago
Nothing slightly more recent (post 2005)? - 1946 and 1964 just don't seem to carry as much weight (although good years)....
Bankruptcy Lawyer: Law Educator, Esq., Attorney replied 2 years ago

Thank you for your reply.

Those are the seminal cases, it has nothing to do with age, it has to do with all of the newer cases all cite to those cases. I do not know who told you older cases do not carry weight, but we still cite Marbury v. Madison and International Shoe v. Washington and those cases date to the early 1800 and early 1900 and the key is that as long as they are prevailing law.

If you would like to go to your court library where you can get free access to westlaw (which we have to pay for as attorneys in our offices at a rate of $150 or more an hour) you can go pull up 2010 and younger cases all citing to the same cases you were provided if that would make you feel better, but it is not necessary when the cases you are citing are the main cases everyone refers back to.

Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Customer reply replied 2 years ago
ok - I guess the "elephant in the room" in this case is what to do with the "potential" lien - and maybe this is what the judge is struggling with - the point being that the lawsuit might result in a claim - so if he confirms my bankruptcy now - with this outstanding lawsuit with a writ attached to it (meaning there is a good probability the other side will win something) hanging over my head - how does he deal with that claim for the potential creditor? If I could make this easier for him, maybe I can get confirmation. I am currently past my 6 month window for confirmation, so I must get confirmed or my case will be dismissed - I can't wait for the result of the lawsuit. HOWEVER, and this was a big shock to me - the judge wants to try the case, which had been scheduled for a major jury trial with extensive financial exhibits - and then determine the extent of the lien. This won't happen for at least two months though, well after my confirmation hearing. The problem is confirmation - I want to be confirmed in 13 now (Nov. 10 is the hearing date). I have about $900k of secured "cap room" - but the writ is for $1.095k, which would bump me over - so technically it's possible (although VERY unlikely) that the claim would result in over $900k - I think this is what the judge is having heartburn over...
Bankruptcy Lawyer: Law Educator, Esq., Attorney replied 2 years ago

Thank you for your reply.

The potential lien has to sit until they perfect it. The court cannot really deal with it until it is perfected in a CH 13. That is why the judge is acting so frustrated. So if he confirms bankruptcy now, he has to come back and modify it later if they perfect the writ of attachment. So the writ can actually put you into CH 7 is likely what the judge is thinking here. You have to use the case law above to argue that the lien is not a lien yet as it is not perfected and as there is no judgment confirming it, so you ask the court to ignore it because no judgment has been entered, which the cases indicate.

Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Ask Law Educator, Esq. Your Own Question
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq., Attorney
Category: Bankruptcy Law
Satisfied Customers: 120,258
120,258 Satisfied Customers
Experience: Attorney At Law handling education matters.

Law Educator, Esq. is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help.

Mary C.Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Terry L.

Terry L.

Attorney

2,677 satisfied customers

Better Business Bureau. 18yrs bankruptcy experience. Chicago Bar Assoc. American Bankruptcy Institute member.

cortrightlaw

cortrightlaw

Attorney

511 satisfied customers

Attorney practicing Bankruptcy Law including Chapter 7, Chapter 11, Chapter 12, and Chapter 13.

JoeLawyer

JoeLawyer

Attorney

376 satisfied customers

Attorney in the practice of Bankruptcy Law since 1996

A.J.

A.J.

Attorney

262 satisfied customers

Experienced consumer bankruptcy attorney.

Fritz

Fritz

Attorney

209 satisfied customers

Florida attorney with extensive experience in Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 consumer bankruptcy cases

Law Girl

Law Girl

Attorney

153 satisfied customers

I am an attorney.

Paul K, Esq.

Paul K, Esq.

Attorney

141 satisfied customers

10 years Exp., Great customer service, Prompt responses.

< Previous | Next >

Related Bankruptcy Law Questions
FILING FOR CHAPTER 7 BANKRUPTCY AS I HAVE CREDIT CARD DEBT
I AM CONSIDERING FILING FOR CHAPTER 7 BANKRUPTCY AS I HAVE CREDIT CARD DEBT OF $65,000 AND NO ASSETS OUTSIDE OF AN AUTO WHICH IS FINANCED AND I AM PAYING MONTHLY ON. I HAVE NO SAVINGS OR BANK ACCOUNT,… read more
Terry L.
Terry L.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
2,677 satisfied customers
I have a chapter 7 in process in las vegas, nv. I have a
I have a chapter 7 in process in las vegas, nv. I have a court date set for a reaffirmation agreement for my mortgage. I would like to change my court date to a more current date. What motion with the… read more
Phillips Esq.
Phillips Esq.
Attorney
Juris Doctor
18,168 satisfied customers
I filled chapter 7 and discharged a mortgage with Wells
I filled chapter 7 and discharged a mortgage with Wells Fargo in 2009. I did not reaffirm the mortgage but I continued making payments for these eight years. I requested a payoff from Wells Fargo and … read more
DrakeLAW
DrakeLAW
Juris Doctorate
911 satisfied customers
I just filed a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case in Massachusetts. I
I just filed a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case in Massachusetts. I learned the name of the assigned trustee this morning via e-mail. When I searched her name online, I learned that she had been a trustee fo… read more
Terry L.
Terry L.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
2,677 satisfied customers
CAN A CHAPTER 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGED ON 12/09 BE OVER
CAN A CHAPTER 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGED ON 12/09 BE OVER TURNED BY A $15,000.00 BREACH OF CONTRACT THAT ACCURED ON 3/08 THROUGH A CIVIL SUIT?… read more
FiveStarLaw
FiveStarLaw
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
477 satisfied customers
I have a lawyer who filed a chapter 7 for us and now wants
I have a lawyer who filed a chapter 7 for us and now wants us to ask for the 7 to be dismissed or converted to a 13. He's a nice guy but i have a bad feeling that he has made some mistakes. I need hel… read more
socrateaser
socrateaser
1,031 satisfied customers
I filed for bankruptcy and qualified for Chapter 7. In the
I filed for bankruptcy and qualified for Chapter 7. In the process the Trustee found a date left off on my Deed of Trust. He filed for an Adversary Proceeding and I received a letter today stating he … read more
KUMI95
KUMI95
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
17 satisfied customers
I filed chapter 7 bankruptcy in December 2009, and left off
I filed chapter 7 bankruptcy in December 2009, and left off a creditor who is now seeking garnish wages. The creditor was left off. It's a friend that file through the sheriff dept in California. Am I… read more
FiveStarLaw
FiveStarLaw
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
477 satisfied customers
I am considering filing a chapter 7 personal bankruptcy. I
I am considering filing a chapter 7 personal bankruptcy. I know some years ago there were some changes in the bankruptcy laws. What I need to know, first of all, is how much money can be retained in a… read more
LegalGems
LegalGems
Juris Doctorate
10,438 satisfied customers
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy in Utah. Now that I have filed for
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy in Utah. Now that I have filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy what happens to my house? I am upside down in my house and have vacated the property. Does my house still go into foreclosu… read more
Roger
Roger
Litigation Attorney
Doctoral Degree
26,823 satisfied customers
Have to file a chapter 7 bankruptcy, What about parrots as
Have to file a chapter 7 bankruptcy, What about parrots as pets...no breeding...no breeding involuled. Also have 4 vehicles Chev p/u 2009, Chev p/u 89, Ford p/up 85, Dodge 74 sedan. Need three vehicle… read more
FiveStarLaw
FiveStarLaw
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
477 satisfied customers
Interested in information concerning personal chapter 7
interested in information concerning personal chapter 7 bankruptcy as a member of a 50/50 LLC … read more
DrakeLAW
DrakeLAW
Juris Doctorate
911 satisfied customers
This is a bankruptcy question. Filed Chapter 7, made
This is a bankruptcy question. Filed Chapter 7, made payments to trustee, finished payments, scheduled this month for the discharge hearing. Problem: one creditor has a lien on our home. What if anyth… read more
FiveStarLaw
FiveStarLaw
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
477 satisfied customers
Regarding my chapter 7 ProSe on the Reaffirmation $2000
Regarding my chapter 7 ProSe on the Reaffirmation $2000 behind on payments, $6000 equity in car Obviously, we don't want to be Repo'd with all that equity.My husband went to the reaff hearing today an… read more
Terry L.
Terry L.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
2,677 satisfied customers
BANKRUPTCY: A debtor wants to file a personal Chapter 7
BANKRUPTCY: A debtor wants to file a personal Chapter 7 bankruptcy and owns a small business. They are filing mostly consumer debts. Can the Debtor continue to run their small business and generate in… read more
LegalGems
LegalGems
Juris Doctorate
10,438 satisfied customers
This is a Chapter 7 question. The Debtor was unemployed for
This is a Chapter 7 question. The Debtor was unemployed for 4 of the last 6 months, having worked the last 2 months. Her currently monthly income amount is above the local median, but averaged over th… read more
Terry L.
Terry L.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
2,677 satisfied customers
My parents filed chapter 7 bankruptcy. They received a
My parents filed chapter 7 bankruptcy. They received a letter back from the attorney they hired and the letter stated, "they are over the limit on the allowable exemptions for a chapter 7".What does t… read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
30,530 satisfied customers
Files his Chapter 7 petition and fails to include a creditor
John files his Chapter 7 petition and fails to include a creditor whom he borrowed $5K from for an educational loan. He wants to amend his petition to include the creditor before his creditors meeting… read more
Terry L.
Terry L.
Attorney
Doctoral Degree
2,677 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x