Bankruptcy Law

Bankruptcy Law Questions? Ask a Bankruptcy Lawyer.

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

Bankruptcy Law
This answer was rated:

We have 2 mortgages on our house. Back in 2009, we filed bankruptcy

We have 2 mortgages...
We have 2 mortgages on our house. Back in 2009, we filed bankruptcy on the arrears for the 2nd mortgage in a Ch 13. We stopped making payments on that 2nd mortgage and I guess we are protected until next December when our bankruptcy is over. Our 1st mortgage is current. The 2nd mortgage the holder charged it off. What does that exactly mean? After our Ch 13 is closed, can they come back and foreclose on our house?
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Answered in 13 minutes by:
11/15/2013
socrateaser
socrateaser, Attorney
Category: Bankruptcy Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,498
Experience: Attorney and Real Estate Broker -- Retired
Verified
Hello,

In order to receive a discharge of your planned-for debts in Chapter 13, you must pay all plan payments according to the plan (aka, "full compliance discharge"). The debts that are discharged are those that are actually "provided for" (paid) in the Ch. 13 plan.

Many times, debtors do not list their mortgages in their Ch. 13 plan, because if the mortgages are listed, the debtor's cannot afford the payments, and the court won't confirm the plan.

If you provided for your 2nd mortgage in the bankruptcy plan, and you make all of your planned payments, then the 2nd mortgage will be discharged, and you will have no further "personal" obligation to pay, even if the property is foreclosed after bankruptcy.

If you did not provide for your 2nd mortgage in the bankruptcy plan, then whether or not you make all of your planned payments, the 2nd mortgage is not discharged, and the creditor can attempt to collect from you on any deficiency balance after foreclosure -- or, by court action without foreclosure.

In your circumstance, the creditor has charged off the debt. This means that the creditor has determined that the mortgage is uncollectible, and reported that fact to the IRS, by sending a 1099-C to you and to the IRS. However, this does not prevent the creditor from selling the debt to a debt collector. In almost every case, the creditor will sell your debt to a debt collector, and the debt collector may decide to try to collect from you, via legal action. This assumes that you did not provide for your 2nd mortgage in your Ch. 13 plan. If you did provide for the 2nd mortgage, then the debt collector cannot sue you -- because the debt is discharged. The only recourse would be foreclosure, and if the 2nd mortgage is underwater, due to the property's low fair market value, then no foreclosure will occur.

I realize that the above is fairly complicated. Feel free to ask for clarification if you do not understand anything I've just discussed.

Please let me know if my answer is helpful. And, thanks for using justanswer.com!
Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago

Ok yes I am fairly confused. =) Not sure what you mean by "PROVIDED" for? Here's what happened. When we filed Ch 13 we put the "arrears" of the 2nd mortgage in our Ch 13 but were supposed to continue to pay the monthly payments to them, just the arrears when into the 13. Well we didn't keep up with them and they charged off the account. So, can they foreclose on us or give us an opportunity to pay something? Perhaps negotiate a "settlement" amount. Clearly our house is underwater. The 2nd holder's mortgage is 70,000. Our 1st mortgage is probably just about covered with the value of our home right now, in a year they might have 10,000 in equity if lucky. What would we do?

Not sure what you mean by "PROVIDED" for?

A: Means that the 2nd mortgage is to be paid or expressly denied payment, as stated in the Ch. 13 plan.

Here's what happened. When we filed Ch 13 we put the "arrears" of the 2nd mortgage in our Ch 13 but were supposed to continue to pay the monthly payments to them, just the arrears when into the 13.

A: Then the 2nd was not provided for, which means it won't be discharged when your Ch. 13 plan is completed.

Well we didn't keep up with them and they charged off the account. So, can they foreclose on us or give us an opportunity to pay something?

A: The creditor can foreclose, regardless of whether or not you filed bankruptcy, and whether or not you provided for the loan in the Ch. 13 plan. The creditor's secured interest in the property survives bankruptcy. Only your personal obligation to pay the debt is discharged. However, where there is no equity in the property, there is no point in foreclosing, because there's no money to be recovered. Consequently, your creditor has only one option: charge off the loan and then sell it to a debt collector.

The debt collector can sue you for the unpaid debt, because it was not provided for in your Ch. 13. That won't cause a foreclosure -- it would give the debt collector the authority to garnish your wages to pay the debt over time. Though, many times, debt collectors don't sue, because the debtor doesn't have sufficient income to make it worth the legal fees involved. So, you may escape further legal action.

Perhaps negotiate a "settlement" amount. Clearly our house is underwater. The 2nd holder's mortgage is 70,000. Our 1st mortgage is probably just about covered with the value of our home right now, in a year they might have 10,000 in equity if lucky. What would we do?

A: At the time when you filed for Ch. 13, "lienstripping" of a 2nd mortgage from a principal residence was not permitted by MN bankruptcy courts. However, that law has changed (see, e.g., In re Atkins, 497 B.R. 568 (USBC MN 2013)). Consequently, you could conceivably ask the bankruptcy court to permit you to strip off the 2nd mortgage. This would completely wipe out the 2nd mortgage -- it would cease to exist, when your Ch. 13 ends -- and the creditor could not foreclose. You would only have a 1st mortgage remaining.

You would need a bankruptcy attorney to handle this for you, but it's a possibility that did not exist when you original filed, so I would encourage you to investigate this possibility.

If you cannot strip off the lien, then all you can do is wait. If you're not sued within six years of the date that your Ch. 13 ends and the automatic stay is lifted, then you would escape under the MN statute of limitations for breach of contract.

Those are the possibilities. Hope this helps.

Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago

Ok then one last ? Do we have to file Ch 13 all over again or can we ask our bankruptcy atty to lienstrip it in the one we have filed?

You can try to do this within your current plan, but the plan will have to be modified to accommodate the lienstrip.

Hope this helps.
Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago

This is what I got back from my lawyer???? Is this true??


Hi Mary, I am so sorry but we can not modify an existing chapter 13 plan to strip a 2nd mortgage, this would of had to have been done with the initial case filing back in 2009.

Tracy Madson

There are a lot of legal issues here, some of which may not be determined without reviewing the Ch. 13 plan language, itself.

What I know, for absolute certain is that the Atkins were able to accomplish the lienstrip after their Chapter 13 plan was already completed and closed! Here's a link to the case, so that you can review it for yourself.

Also, if you cannot strip the lien in the current case, then you may want to consider dismissing the case and then filing a new Chapter 13. Obviously this would increase the length of your bankruptcy -- but if that would permit you to strip the lien, then it may be worth the hassle.

I don't want to get into an academic argument with your attorney. You can offer to pay her for a "memorandum of law" on the question of stripping the lien, now that the law has changed. That may be the only way you will get something more useful than the unequivocal answer you have so far received.

Personally, I think that the question is not subject to an instant "yes" or "no" response -- but, I'm not your lawyer, and I don't know all of the case details -- so, there's no way that I can take a conclusive position on whether or not the lienstrip is possible in your unique circumstances.

I'm really not trying to "duck the question" here. The issue is very complicated.

Hope this helps.

socrateaser
socrateaser, Attorney
Category: Bankruptcy Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,498
Experience: Attorney and Real Estate Broker -- Retired
Verified
socrateaser and 87 other Bankruptcy Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Customer reply replied 4 years ago

Our bankruptcy atty won't file a new Ch 13 he told us we would have to go thru a different atty. Is it an option with this for us to hire just a real estate atty to file to the courts to strip that loan? Looks like the Atkins did that?

The typical real estate attorney is not qualified to conduct this sort of case -- moreover, such an attorney may not even be admitted to the U.S. District Court. You need a very competent bankruptcy lawyer. No one else will do.

Note: I looked up your lawyer in the MN State attorney licensing database. From the information I found (and, I admit that I could be wrong, due to the lack of a direct database disclosing the identities of lawyers admitted to practice before the federal district court) -- it appears that she may no longer be practicing law in MN. That would explain why she doesn't want the case.

Hope this helps.
Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago

No Tracy works there, my attorney is Curtis Walker?

Oh. Okay. Here's the link for Mr. Walker. Says that he is "authorized," which means he can continue to represent you.

I don't know what else to tell you. If your lawyer says you can't strip the lien, and won't explain why (and you don't want to pay for a memorandum of law), then you'll either have to shop around for someone else, or file a complaint with the MN LPRB. That probably won't make your lawyer very happy, but you're legally entitled to do so.

If you want to look for someone else, then for a lawyer referral, see this link.

Best wishes.
Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago

That's my question. How do i pay for that memorandum of law? Not clear on what that means. '

As far as our atty, he just basically said that closing a 13 case and filing a new one makes his law firm look bad so another atty would have to do it.

It's not clear to me that closing the existing bankruptcy is necessary. Which is why a memorandum of law (MOL) may be in order. An MOL is a written brief to a client (or more often to a lawyer in the same law firm) explaining the law surrounding a particular issue of law. In your case, you want to know (1) whether or not it's possible to modify your Chapter 13 to permit you to strip the lien off of your property, and what are the risks, if the issue is uncertain; (2) if it's even necessary to modify your Chapter 13, given that it was not necessary in the Atkins case; (3) assuming it's not possible to modify the existing Chapter 13 or to lien strip without modifying, then what are the risks and benefits of dismissing the existing Chapter 13 and refiling another Chapter 13; and (4) would it be better to complete the existing Chapter 13, and then file a new Chapter 13.

Note: I could research and answer these questions, but the reality is that no matter what I tell you, unless the bankruptcy lawyer you hire agrees with my analysis and conclusions, he/she will decline to undertake the work -- which is exactly what's happening at the moment in your case.

P.S. I've answered an awful lot of extra questions for you in this session. Would you please consider providing a positive rating for another answer, so that I can receive appropriate compensation for this extra effort?

Hope this helps.
socrateaser
socrateaser, Attorney
Category: Bankruptcy Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,498
Experience: Attorney and Real Estate Broker -- Retired
Verified
socrateaser and 87 other Bankruptcy Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Customer reply replied 4 years ago

I just did. -) Thank you so much. Your input is helping me however. Are you are saying I should be able to type a written brief to my lawyer and he can look into it....

Are you are saying I should be able to type a written brief to my lawyer and he can look into it.

A: Typically, your attorney is the one who should be writing the brief to you. But, attorneys know that overwhelmingly, clients do not want to pay for written opinions. Clients want "action" in court, before they feel that they have been provided value for their money. Also, to be frank, the vast majority of lawyers are simply not very good at researching the law. Instead of doing so, they write a pleading for the court, allow their opponent to object, and then let the court do the research.

Bankruptcy attorneys are generally better at research than most. But, for whatever reason, your attorney seems disinterested in trying to determine whether or not you can proceed to strip the lien.

I can think of several possible reasons for this -- some of them reasonable, and some that could be quite troublesome for your lawyer. I just don't feel comfortable discussing these possibilities in an open forum. Not that I'm member of a "club" where lawyers never speak badly of other lawyers. Just that in this particular case, it is a fact that when you filed your Chapter 13, lienstripping was not permitted, and now -- it is. Consequently, there are things that your attorney could not have known for certain at the time you filed.

But, then, I must ask myself: Why is it that the attorney for Atkins seems to have been able to protect his/her clients by adding details to the Chapter 13 plan, that seem to have predicted that it would be possible to later strip the lien, and the details appear to have made this possible?

Random chance -- dumb luck -- astounding prescience -- I don't know the answer. What I know is that the Atkins confirmed plan apparently successfully provided for the possibility of a lienstrip that was legally impossible at the time that the Atkins' plan was confirmed. And, so, I must ask myself, did your lawyer do similarly -- and if not, then why not?

The entire issue seems a little bizarre -- almost like the Atkins' attorney had a crystal ball -- which I do not buy into one bit. But, that is what happened, and so the Atkins were able to strip the lien.

Is your attorney concerned about the possibility of a malpractice action by you, or sanction by the bankruptcy court, for failing to include the Atkins plan language? Seems unlikely, because again, Atkins' plan appears to have accomplished a nearly magical thing, by predicting that lienstripping would become permissible, before the bankruptcy courts ruled it so.

The question now is whether or not, even if your confirmed plan does not have the required language, why can't you strip the lien using some other legal theory, and if none works, then why not dismiss the Chapter 13, thereby voiding the plan, and file a new Chapter 13, and the file an adversary proceeding to strip the lien?

Tough questions, with equally tough answers.

Hope this helps.

That's my muse for the day.
socrateaser
socrateaser, Attorney
Category: Bankruptcy Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,498
Experience: Attorney and Real Estate Broker -- Retired
Verified
socrateaser and 87 other Bankruptcy Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Customer reply replied 2 years ago

We are now out of our Ch 13 and that 2nd mortgage is lingering and we are worried they are going to come after us for it. They are aware we are not protected by 13 anymore. The balance on the loan is 70,000 and now, our first mtg is NOT underwater with the economy the way it is but we certainly don't have 70,000 in equity. We might have 40,000? What do we do or should we just sit and wait? Is there a statue of limitations when they can't come after us and have to release the lien?

Hello again,

Please open a new Q&A session for your new question. Put my userid in the first sentence of your new question, so that it is directed to me (e.g., "ToCustomeronly").

The system has been modified since last we spoke; customers can no longer rate more than once in any Q&A session -- consequently, I would have to answer you here for free.

Thanks for your understanding and cooperation.
Ask Your Own Bankruptcy Law Question
Ask socrateaser Your Own Question
socrateaser
socrateaser
socrateaser, Attorney
Category: Bankruptcy Law
Satisfied Customers: 39,498
39,498 Satisfied Customers
Experience: Attorney and Real Estate Broker -- Retired

socrateaser is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help.

Mary C.Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Terry L.

Terry L.

Attorney

2,679 satisfied customers

Better Business Bureau. 18yrs bankruptcy experience. Chicago Bar Assoc. American Bankruptcy Institute member.

cortrightlaw

cortrightlaw

Attorney

511 satisfied customers

Attorney practicing Bankruptcy Law including Chapter 7, Chapter 11, Chapter 12, and Chapter 13.

JoeLawyer

JoeLawyer

Attorney

376 satisfied customers

Attorney in the practice of Bankruptcy Law since 1996

A.J.

A.J.

Attorney

262 satisfied customers

Experienced consumer bankruptcy attorney.

Fritz

Fritz

Attorney

209 satisfied customers

Florida attorney with extensive experience in Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 consumer bankruptcy cases

Law Girl

Law Girl

Attorney

153 satisfied customers

I am an attorney.

Paul K, Esq.

Paul K, Esq.

Attorney

141 satisfied customers

10 years Exp., Great customer service, Prompt responses.

< Previous | Next >

Related Bankruptcy Law Questions
I am the buyer on a land contract. The seller wants to get
I am the buyer on a land contract. The seller wants to get out of the contract to go with another offer/contract. They have threatened to file bankruptcy if we do not accept a small fee to walk from o… read more
DrakeLAW
DrakeLAW
Juris Doctorate
984 satisfied customers
I had a hearing in bankruptcy court- does this mean I wasn't
I had a hearing in bankruptcy court- does this mean I wasn't supposed to defend myself against the one who called for the hearing?… read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
Will my contracts with ATT, TV, and Cel phone be terminated
HI! will my contracts with ATT , TV, and Cel phone be terminated through bankruptcy 13 or 7? Thank you. … read more
LawGuy
LawGuy
Juris Doctor
123 satisfied customers
I have a contract with a California corporation and the
I have a contract with a California corporation and the consideration are Pref shares of the company. There are three payments; an initial payment, 2 years later and 4 year later. Paid in thirds. The … read more
TJ, Esq.
TJ, Esq.
Juris Doctor (JD)
11,265 satisfied customers
Why is it legal for a creditor to get awarded a wage
Why is it legal for a creditor to get awarded a wage garnishment against me while I am in a Chapter 13?This creditor was a debt my almost ex wife had and was not notified of the chapter 13 filing I'm … read more
INFOLAWYER
INFOLAWYER
Partner
Doctoral Degree
56,317 satisfied customers
In Utah there is a statute of limitation with respect to
In Utah there is a statute of limitation with respect to collecting on a note. If the creditor has made contact with the debtor during the period does that protect the creditor from having the statute… read more
Ely
Ely
Counselor at Law
Juris Doctor
266 satisfied customers
Assignment of an executory contract in bankruptcy or a
Assignment of an executory contract in bankruptcy or a workout. If a corporation underwent an involuntary wind down. Say an ABC (Assignment for the benefit of Creditors) would the "sale of all or subs… read more
Phillips Esq.
Phillips Esq.
Attorney
Juris Doctor
18,393 satisfied customers
I have an Executory contract. A 10 year license of software.
I have an Executory contract. A 10 year license of software. We are the Licensor. The licensee has paid for the license with shares of its company (private). There are milestone payments. I believe th… read more
DrakeLAW
DrakeLAW
Juris Doctorate
984 satisfied customers
If a debtor is subject to a wage garnishment and the wages
If a debtor is subject to a wage garnishment and the wages are garnished at the employer level, what happens to the non-garnished wages? Can the creditor now just go to the bank and get the 75% of the… read more
Barrister
Barrister
Attorney/Landlord/Realtor
Doctoral Degree
35,389 satisfied customers
I have a question about the statute of limitations under
I have a question about the statute of limitations under UFTA or its successor statute. If I understand it correctly, a person who is deemed to have transferred something of value may be adjudicated o… read more
DrakeLAW
DrakeLAW
Juris Doctorate
984 satisfied customers
I received a letter from the united states bankruptcy court
i received a letter from the united states bankruptcy court southern district of new york … read more
Barrister
Barrister
Attorney/Landlord/Realtor
Doctoral Degree
35,389 satisfied customers
After a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, an Equity loan was reaffirmed,
After a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, an Equity loan was reaffirmed, but only by the husband. The wife never signed. Does this mean that the loan company now has lost consent? In her not reaffirming the loan … read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
I filed a proof of claim for wages awarded by the CA Labor
I filed a proof of claim for wages awarded by the CA Labor Commission but the earned date is outside of the 180 day threshold per 507(a)(4) to qualify for priority status. Can I tardily file a wage cl… read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
I am an unsecured creditor (unpaid wages awarded by the
I am an unsecured creditor (unpaid wages awarded by the Labor Commission) in a Chap 7 bankruptcy case. I just received a summary of the trustee's final report and it appears that the trustee is recomm… read more
DrakeLAW
DrakeLAW
Juris Doctorate
984 satisfied customers
I was pursuing unpaid wages from a previous employer when he
I was pursuing unpaid wages from a previous employer when he filed Chapter 7. The wages are more than 180 prior to the date of the bankruptcy filing. Is there a way to keep my claim from being dischar… read more
Bill Attorney
Bill Attorney
law
1,607 satisfied customers
Bankruptcy court trial hearing Brief needed. I am a
Bankruptcy court trial hearing Brief needed. I am a Creditor, already finished a Rule 2004 exam on Debtor, out of court. I must file brief and exhibits by this Friday.… read more
PaulmoJD
PaulmoJD
Attorney At Law
Doctoral Degree
106 satisfied customers
We sued a person for breach of contract, they filed
We sued a person for breach of contract, they filed bankruptcy right before the last court date so they didn't have to pay, can we re file the suit under a different cause. … read more
Ray
Ray
Lawyer
Doctoral Degree
30,899 satisfied customers
In Utah, is there a difference in the statute of limitations
In Utah, is there a difference in the statute of limitations on a "fraudulent transfer" in a bankruptcy compared to a judgement execution?… read more
Ely
Ely
Counselor at Law
Juris Doctor
266 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x