Australia Law

Have Australian Law Questions? Ask a Lawyer Now.

Ask a Lawyer,
Get an Answer ASAP!

Australia Law
This answer was rated:

Property/Owners Corporation Question (Victoria). My OC has

Property/Owner's Corporation Question (Victoria)....
Property/Owner's Corporation Question (Victoria). My OC has no maintenance plan and tends to leave maintenance of areas under its responsibility until absolutely necessary or from sustained pressure from individual unit owners. My (second level) windows have rotted badly to the extent that six sash windows need replacement (beyond repair) at a cost of $8000. The OC says we must share the cost of replacement as the OC are responsible only for the outside of the window and I am responsible for the inside - as the lot boundary runs through the centre of the wall - so that's 50/50. My view however, is that it was the failure of the OC to discharge its duty to maintain the outside of the window which entirely led to the need to replace the windows, nothing I have done internally has contributed to the rotting of the windows. Accordingly, rather than basing responsibility on lot boundaries, it should be based on who failed to meet their responsibility to avoid the situation arising. Do I have a case?
Show More
Show Less
Ask Your Own Australia Law Question
Answered in 1 hour by:
1/13/2013
Leon
Leon, Solicitor
Category: Australia Law
Satisfied Customers: 45,456
Experience: BEc Dip Ed, Dip Law (SAB) MTax (UNSW)
Verified
Good Afternoon.

Thank you for your question. To Introduce myself I am a sydney based Solicitor and will do my best to provide you with relevant information to assist you.

What is your Unit entitlement based on the total strata?

The windows are common property and the cost is born by the Owners Corporation and each unit owner contributed as per their entitlements if there is no money in the sinking fund.

Unless you can show personal loss and damage to your personal property you cannot claim against them.

The building is the responsibility of the OC and they have to pay. You each contribute to the maintenance in your levies.

They cannot ask you to pay 50% unless you have 50% of the total unit entitlements.

I hope this is of assistance. If I have missed anything, or you have any further questions please let me know before leaving any feedback.

If I have assisted please do not forget to leave me with positive feedback.

 

Ask Your Own Australia Law Question
Customer reply replied 5 years ago

There are 42 lots, (9 with entitlements and liabilities of only 2) 33 with entitlements and matching liabilities ranging from 167 to 333 totalling 10,000. My apartment has entitlements and liabilities of 257. The OC's explanation for the 50/50 requirement was by way of sending a copy of the plan of subdivision which shows the lot boundary runs through the median of the width of the external walls, thereby dividing the responsibilities between unit owner (internal) and OC (external). The OC say that as the windows are half external and half internal, any replacement is 50/50. Does the title boundary between my unit and common property (median of external walls) change your advice?

Good Evening

They are wrong

Your contribution would be 257/10,000

Unless there is a by-law that says unit owners are liable for the windows.

You are not liable.

Can you send me the plan they are referring to?
Ask Your Own Australia Law Question
Customer reply replied 5 years ago

 

 

Here it is, the words "median of walls floors and ceilings"

Do you have the actual strata plan?

This means nothing without seeing the plan.


Ask Your Own Australia Law Question
Customer reply replied 5 years ago

Here it is, I'm unit 31:


 


Attachment: 2013-01-13_091416_yarra_17-25.pdf

Good Morning

They are wrong.

It is a typical strata plan. You own from the paint inward. The building is common property and they are responsible for the lot.

If they do not agree then you will have to take action against them by suing in VCAT.

You are only liable for your share based on the unit entitlement.

I hope this is of assistance. If I have missed anything, or you have any further questions please let me know before leaving any feedback.

If I have assisted please do not forget to leave me with positive feedback.


Ask Your Own Australia Law Question
Customer reply replied 5 years ago

Thanks, but could you please clarify the relevance of the lot boundary defined as "median of walls floors and ceilings"? This is what the OC relies upon because they say the lot boundary defines that I am responsible for - that is, the building from the lot boundary inwards.


 


Also, are you able to identify yourself and be engaged by me if this matter escalates with the OC?

Good Morning,

I am unable to answer that and what ir actually means.

The Windows though do not form part of the Wall. They are external and form part of the building and the liability and responsibility of the body corporate.

The actual Strata plan does not split the walls between common property and non-common property and therefore I cannot see how they can make the claim they are.

I am unable to take on work privately, as the terms and conditions I have entered into with just answer will only permit me to respond online.

As this matter is a Victorian matter, I would suggest you contact the Law Institute of Victoria and get a referral to a solicitor the practices in property law and get more detailed advice.

The website is as follows:

http://liv.asn.au

I hope this is of assistance. If I have missed anything, or you have any further questions please let me know before leaving any feedback.

If I have assisted please do not forget to leave me with positive feedback.



Leon
Leon, Solicitor
Category: Australia Law
Satisfied Customers: 45,456
Experience: BEc Dip Ed, Dip Law (SAB) MTax (UNSW)
Verified
Leon and 87 other Australia Law Specialists are ready to help you
Ask your own question now
Customer reply replied 4 years ago


Hi, I believe some of the advice above may not be accurate. In NSW it is clear that a windows is part of a wall, and is therefore OC responsibility. In Victoria, it is not as clear cut because a "median" title boundary as described above can be drawn through the walls AND WINDOWS of an external wall to create a sharing of responsibility (and there is no requirement for a sinking fund).

 

Please clarify the following question: If the ownership of the window is shared by virtue of the title running through the median of the window, could it be said that as the owner made no contribution to the damage to the window frames internally (ie the damage was caused by rain penetration from the outside caused by failure to adequately maintain the exterior of the window which is OC responsibility), notwithstanding the shared ownership, the OC should repair the window at general OC cost as the damage was caused from their side?

Good Afternoon,

The answer to your question is a yes the owners Corporation is responsible.

If the entry of the water is due to the owners Corporation failing to maintain the exterior of the Windows resulting in a deterioration of the seals then it is the owners corporations cost to repair the windows and the sales to stop any further damage.

It is also very responsibility for the repair of any damage to the unit owners personal items as a result of the water entering the unit.

I hope this is of assistance. If I have missed anything, or you have any further questions please let me know before leaving any feedback.

If I have assisted please do not forget to leave me with positive feedback.

Ask Your Own Australia Law Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago

Thanks. XXXXX has replaced six window saches for which they want me to pay half of the cost ($8000). They say that because I own half the windows, then the cost is 50/50. My view is that regardless of the unit boundary and ownerships, as they allowed the external surface of the window to deterior to the point of needing to replace the windows, and I caused no damage to the internal surface of the windows, I should not contribute. Please confirm that such an argument would be defendible at VCAT.

Good Afternoon,

The damage that has been caused is because they failed to maintain the external windows which made the seals fail.

If they are going to demand 50% payment then I would suggest that the parties that are requested to pay the other half take the matter further and have a night before VCAT.

The position of the unit holders has to be that the damage was as a direct result of the failure by the owners Corporation to maintain the Windows.

This is the argument I would suggest you run in VCAT.

I hope this is of assistance. If I have missed anything, or you have any further questions please let me know before leaving any feedback.

If I have assisted please do not forget to leave me with positive feedback.

Ask Your Own Australia Law Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago


The windows are double hung sash windows (two window panes that slide up and down one inside the other). I have a second concern that if I dispute the bill to VCAT and the Tribunal agree that the cost should be apportioned based on the "median of walls", they may even go further based on the property boundary and conclude:

 

1. The upper sash window, which did not require replacement, sits flush with the outside wall and therefore is the responsibility of the OC.

2. The lower sash window sits flush with the inside wall of the apartment and therefore replacement of this sash is 100% my responsibility as owner.

 

Is this a danger?

Good Morning,

What actually caused the water to come in was at the frame of the window from the outside not been properly sealed and maintained?
The people that replace the windows, are they able to confirm what the cause of the problem was and give a report which point to the fact that the owners Corporation's failure to maintain caused the problem?
This is the type of evidence the court looks set your argument versus the argument of the owners Corporation will not hold much weight and if that is the only evidence before the court, it will have to guess what it thinks is right.
But a report from the people that replace the windows confirming the actual cause of the problem and that it was because of failure of maintenance by the owners Corporation will not cause you any problem with costs.
Ask Your Own Australia Law Question
Customer reply replied 4 years ago
Relist: Answer quality.
All of the above! The answers are coming back so quickly they can't possibly have been given enough thought. I first got an incorrect answer (based on NSW legislation whilst I am in Victoria) and am now not getting a specific answer to my specific question. I will ask it again with more detail and you will see 2 questions at the end which I would like answered please:
I have a 1980s strata title apartment in VICTORIA in a three storey block of 44 apartments. It has timber double hung sash windows. The bottom sash window timber frames and sills weathered and rotted beyond repair due to rot caused by weather/rain and have had to be completely replaced. The OC had neglected maintenance work to keep them waterproof or to prevent the rot occurring.
The complex is under the thresholds for a mandatory requirement for a maintenance plan and does not have one.
The Owner's Corporation Rules are based on the model rules in the Owners Corporation Act 2006 and make no mention of maintenance or windows.
There are one or two other sills in the apartment complex with evidence of rot in sills but essentially my apartment is worst affected due to facing west and being on the first floor (the ground floor windows are protected by carports and the upper level is protected by the eaves. The works undertaken to replace the six window sashes is confined to my apartment alone.
The OC says that the cost of the replacement of the timber windows/sills is to be shared 50/50 (half each) based on the boundary between owner's responsibility and OC Responsibility being the "median of walls" (specified in words in the Plan of Subdivision) and therefore the windows are half external and half internal (hence 50/50).
My view is:
1. Apportioning of costs 50/50 is too simplistic when taking into consideration that the rot was caused by lack of maintenance to the outside surfaces, that is, the failure by the OC to maintain the outside surface of the timber windows/sills allowed rot to occur beyond repair from the outside (the weather side), and therefore the OC has a greater responsibility to fund the repairs apportioned based on unit entitlements. Nothing I did contributed to the poor state of the windows/sills.
2. However, I have a second concern that if I dispute the bill to VCAT and the Tribunal agreed that the cost should be apportioned based on the "median of walls", they may even go further than the OC based on the property boundary and conclude:
• the upper window sash, which did not require replacement, sits flush with the outside wall of the unit and is therefore OC responsibility,
• the lower sash (which slides inside the outer pane) sits flush with the inside wall of the apartment and therefore cost of replacement of this sash is 100% my responsibility as unit owner.
A contrary view in support of the 50/50 split is that the benefit of the repairs is entirely to my lot and therefore the OC Act 2006 allows for the OC to seek reimbursement of their costs. S28 reads:
28(2)
A lot owner is not liable to pay or contribute to the funds
of the owners corporation a proportion of any amount
required to discharge a liability of the owners corporation
exceeding the lot owner's lot liability.
28(3)
Sub-section (2) does not apply to an amount payable to
an owners corporation for repairs, maintenance or other
works that are undertaken by the owners corporation on
common property or a lot and which are wholly or
substantially for the benefit of some or one, but not all, of
the lots affected by the owners corporation.

DO I HAVE A CASE FOR DISPUTING THE 50/50 APPORTIONMENT OR IS KILLED BY SEC28(3) OF THE OC ACT 2006?

HOW MUCH RISK IS THERE THAT BY CONTESTING THE MATTER I MIGHT HAVE TO PAY 100% BASED IN 2. ABOVE?

Ask Leon Your Own Question
Leon
Leon
Leon, Solicitor
Category: Australia Law
Satisfied Customers: 45,456
45,456 Satisfied Customers
Experience: BEc Dip Ed, Dip Law (SAB) MTax (UNSW)

Leon is online now

A new question is answered every 9 seconds

How JustAnswer works:

  • Ask an ExpertExperts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional AnswerVia email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction GuaranteeRate the answer you receive.

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

Gary B.Edmond, OK

My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

EricRedwood City, CA

I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

MichaelWichita, KS

PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent.

Three H.Houston, TX

Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!!

ElaineAtlanta, GA

It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem.

TonyApopka, FL

Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help.

Mary C.Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

< Previous | Next >

Meet the Experts:

Deborah Awyzio

Deborah Awyzio

Solicitor

863 satisfied customers

Bachelor of Laws (QUT), BIT (QUT), Family Law Accredited Specialist, over 12 years experience

Sean

Sean

Experienced lawyer

855 satisfied customers

Law degree with 1st class honours from Australian National University.

James G.

James G.

Lawyer

17 satisfied customers

Australian Legal Practitioner

Darren Kruse

Darren Kruse

Solicitor

16 satisfied customers

Practising in in Personal Injury, Workcover, Civil Disputes, Family, Wills and Estates and Criminal law.

Leon

Leon

Solicitor

45,456 satisfied customers

BEc Dip Ed, Dip Law (SAB) MTax (UNSW)

Daniel

Daniel

Solicitor

5,833 satisfied customers

Bachelor of Laws (dist) Graduate Diploma in Legal Practise. Admitted NSW Supreme Court / High Court

James D. Ford

James D. Ford

Solicitor

1,600 satisfied customers

Consulting Principal at Nexus Law Group

< Previous | Next >

Related Australia Law Questions
Victoria. My ex husband and I are "legally" separated for
My ex husband and I are "legally" separated for the past 3 years. I have registered this with Centrelink. We were married 21 years (24 years now legally). We have 3 children, 1 of whom is still a minor and lives with me. he is 14 years old. My ex husband is not making any arrangements as yet to get divorced as he says he's "not sure" ... but I am. I'm not sure how to go about divorce. We were married in South Africa in 1994 and have a marriage contract. Would our marraige contract still be valid in Australia if we got divorced? … read more
Leon
Leon
Solicitor
45,456 satisfied customers
My husband and I had a few insurance policies with AMP
My husband and I had a few insurance policies with AMP before. Presently I only have my life insurance which was converted from a previous policy into what is called Flexible Lifetime - Protection Pla… read more
John Melis
John Melis
Diploma In Law
1,365 satisfied customers
My wife and I purchased a house and settlement was to be at
Hello my wife and I purchased a house and settlement was to be at 12:30 Friday 19/01/18 we organised a REMOVALIST they arrived loaded a house lot then drove to house we purchased got there around 1:45… read more
John Melis
John Melis
Diploma In Law
1,365 satisfied customers
Just wanna ask question. Victoria. Its all about my friend
just wanna ask question JA: What state are you in? It matters because laws vary by location. Customer: victoria JA: Has anything been filed or reported? Customer: nah JA: Anything else you want the la… read more
John Melis
John Melis
Diploma In Law
1,365 satisfied customers
We have had a car stored in our shed for 13-14yrs the owner
We have had a car stored in our shed for 13-14yrs the owner never came to pick it up she would ring about once a year promise to pick up in a few weeks but didn't we had no contact number or a full na… read more
John Melis
John Melis
Diploma In Law
1,365 satisfied customers
My wife and I have planned a holiday to the East Coast and
Hi, My wife and I have planned a holiday to the East Coast and have booked and paid for a number of hotels and airlines. Since booking I have suffered a major heart trauma and am unable to travel. I h… read more
Leon
Leon
Solicitor
45,456 satisfied customers
I am looking for some advice but not sure if you can help in
I am looking for some advice but not sure if you can help in my case... My ex partner and I separated almost two years ago and we have a daughter that is almost three years old. She is planning to go back to our country of origin with my daughter and I just wanna know if the Australian law can help me to keep my daughter with me if i am not Citizen or Permanent Resident... … read more
John Melis
John Melis
Diploma In Law
1,365 satisfied customers
My mother has passed away and I am now a beneficiary to her
My mother has passed away and I am now a beneficiary to her will. I am however under bankruptcy and want to know if I can disclaim my inheritance. Can this be done? … read more
Leon
Leon
Solicitor
45,456 satisfied customers
As a Sole Trader, if a Customer is refusing to pay for Parts
As a Sole Trader, if a Customer is refusing to pay for Parts installed into a Pump on their property (I have the Proof of Purchase for the parts installed), I have 7 months of left messages, actual co… read more
John Melis
John Melis
Diploma In Law
1,365 satisfied customers
I was convicted of centerlink fraud with a suspended
hi. i was convicted of centerlink fraud with a suspended sentence which finished 6 years ago, am i elligible for the esta waiver to travel to the usa? … read more
Daniel
Daniel
Solicitor
Bachelor's Degree / Graduate Diploma
5,833 satisfied customers
My sister in law has purchased a unit in Bicton she was
Hi my sister in law has purchased a unit in Bicton she was informed by agent thst strata fees were $450 per quarter she budgeted for this and cannot afford any more as she is on a pension when she miv… read more
John Melis
John Melis
Diploma In Law
1,365 satisfied customers
My son lives in qld and is in debt up to his eyebrows .I am
Hi my son lives in qld and is in debt up to his eyebrows .I am 81 and cannot help can you tell me if he can cet his bank to freeze his house mortgage for a period to help … read more
John Melis
John Melis
Diploma In Law
1,365 satisfied customers
I just don't know how to ask this question in realation to a
Hello I just don't know how to ask this question in realation to a retail employee that's going into the 7 year on casual rates … read more
John Melis
John Melis
Diploma In Law
1,365 satisfied customers
My husband and I have recently separeted, living still on
My husband and I have recently separeted, living still on the same property, I have invested all my life savings of $130'000 from overseas (Switzerland) into the property and relationship. Unfortunate… read more
Leon
Leon
Solicitor
45,456 satisfied customers
I have been billed by both AGL and Red Energy for the same
I have been billed by both AGL and Red Energy for the same period. I signed up to Red Energy after a door to door salesman came by. AGL then contacted me a day later and offered me a good deal to stay… read more
John Melis
John Melis
Diploma In Law
1,365 satisfied customers
I have an enquiry in regards to a towing dispute. I am
Good afternoon, I have an enquiry in regards ***** ***** towing dispute. … read more
Daniel
Daniel
Solicitor
Bachelor's Degree / Graduate Diploma
5,833 satisfied customers
I my dad had a car accident in my car im insured with bingle
hi i my dad had a car accident in my car im insured with bingle bingle organized to take it to one of ther accessor to see the damage first off i had to go all the way to doncaster to one of there rep… read more
John Melis
John Melis
Diploma In Law
1,365 satisfied customers
Is it illegal to put spy wear on a partners mobile which
Is it illegal to put spy wear on a partners mobile which allows to monitor all calls and text messages and photos he also illegal got the thumb print and got onto the mobile and downloaded all message… read more
John Melis
John Melis
Diploma In Law
1,365 satisfied customers

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.

The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).

Show MoreShow Less

Ask Your Question

x